If anyone knows how to generate a transcript, this would be very useful for the discussion. Jmo
Youtube's own transcript isn't perfect but may be helpful:
9:01
May we approach now you yes you move on um
9:09
you've been qualified in other courts to tfy as an expert in the area of AC reconstruction is that right yes sir um
9:16
you were not hired by the defense in this case correct that is correct at the time you did your expert review Dr Wolf
9:23
uh and your consultation uh you and I have never met that's correct you did not who I you did
9:29
not know who I was I did not you had never met miss little no Mr unti no matter of fact you had never heard of
9:34
this case that's correct um you were hired by another agency not connected in any way to the defense is that right
9:41
correct and not connected in any way to the Commonwealth is that right correct to your analysis and your conclusions
9:46
and your opinions are completely independent of the defense and the Commonwealth in this case is that right
9:52
Jackson sustain Mr Jackson you can ask it differently when you did your anal is
9:59
and conclusions well let me ask it this way you finalized your report you and your team correct correct that report is
10:05
contain oops that report is contained in a multi-page document uh
10:10
that was submitted following your analysis and your opinions and conclusions right
10:16
correct we didn't the defense didn't have anything to do with that correct correct you never met us didn't know who
10:22
we were when you did this correct you never met Mr L didn't know who he was when you did this correct so your
10:27
analysis opinions testing and conclusions were were requested by a completely separate agency that is
10:34
correct all right um goes without saying but I'm going to I'm going to ask it anyway you haven't been paid by the
10:39
defense you have not paid us anything no um and you don't work for us that's
10:45
correct as a matter of fact I've never asked you specific questions about your testing before today that is
10:54
correct your work product the report that you provided was provided both to to the defense as well as the
11:00
Commonwealth is that right that's my understanding yes and you were equally available to both sides in terms of them
11:06
reaching out correct yes and I called you ultimately after receiving your report asked if you join us and testify
11:13
correct that is correct all right were you and your team asked to
11:18
undertake a review for purposes of AC accident reconstruction of the case that's now pending before the court yes
11:24
sir was your team asked to do this by the agency that ultimately retained you not us
11:29
that's correct um who at Arco was assigned to the team who would ultimately undertake this job of
11:36
accident reconstruction it was myself Dr Andrew renchler and Scott Klein what was
11:41
Dr wrench's role in this case as it's distinguished from your role in the case certainly so Dr wrencher is a
11:48
biomechanical engineer uh and ultimately he assessed whether or not there was a mechanism for the injuries of Mr John
11:53
O'Keefe and what was your focus if he's talking about the injuries to Mr O'Keefe what was your your focus in your
12:00
reconstruction and your analysis I I would simply say it was looking more at the damage to the
12:05
vehicle okay so in terms of your team and the
12:11
the responsibilities of each of the team members you were more focused on the damage to the SUV Dr richler was more
12:18
focused on the injuries suffered by Mr o'keef correct I think that's that's a fair character characterization although
12:26
with the caveat that we work together as a team so we weren't isolated kind of in those areas you know not speaking to
