kuromiiiilove
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2024
- Messages
- 1,019
- Reaction score
- 12,175
That’s assuming way too much precision from data that’s already shown to be questionable. JOK’s phone stopping movement at 12:32 isn’t “rock solid” , considering there are admitted gaps, missing records, and issues with preservation. The defense already raised serious concerns about how and when that phone was handled.I feel the case will now come down to how tightly the CW can tie the Lexus data to the cell data.
IMO it's rock solid JOKs phone never moved after 12.32. If the Lexus high speed reversing event is also at 12.32 that is a hell of a powerful coincidence.
And the Lexus data, IMO, is vague telematics and timestamps without GPS, interpreted by someone who never even verified the clock on the vehicle. That’s circumstantial on top of circumstantial. If the CW wants to lean on digital forensics, they need to be ready to explain all the holes, inconsistencies, and bias in how it was collected and interpreted. Because right now, it looks like they’re stacking shaky data to try and retrofit a timeline.
MOO.