MA - Professor Karen Read, 43, charged with murdering police officer boyfriend John O'Keefe by hitting him with car, Canton, 14 Apr 2023 #22 Retrial

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #181
  • #182
Hank is so done! I just love how that battery temp that was supposed to be "trial over" backfired on him.
 
  • #183
I would love to look at the neighbors video camera to see who placed it there.
Now, that would be something, considering there was never any video from the night of JOK's death, IIRC.
I can't remember why, but I'm sure that someone else does.
IMO.
 
  • #184
I enjoyed this little exchange between Dr Wolfe and Atty Brennan about Dr Wolfe mentioning Atty Jackson by his first name:

Mr. Brennan: Did you become friendly with Atty Jackson?
Dr. Wolfe: I wouldn’t say that we were friends.
Mr. Brennan: I didn’t ask if you were friends. Did you become friendly?
Dr Wolfe: I talked to him like I would all the attorneys that I work with.
Mr. Brennan: What would you call me?
Dr. Wolfe: *dimpled grin* Mr. Brennan.

Ha! Lowkey burn. Oor Dr. Wolfe is quick on his feet.
 
  • #185
I find it absolutely fascinating how people can be watching the exactly same testimony and come away with completely different opinions.
Totally agree, it’s fascinating how perception splits. I think a big part of that is because there’s just no hard physical evidence in the car tying her to what they’re alleging. So people end up leaning more on vibes and interpretation than actual proof. MOO.
 
  • #186
I enjoyed this little exchange between Dr Wolfe and Atty Brennan about Dr Wolfe mentioning Atty Jackson by his first name:

Mr. Brennan: Did you become friendly with Atty Jackson?
Dr. Wolfe: I wouldn’t say that we were friends.
Mr. Brennan: I didn’t ask if you were friends. Did you become friendly?
Dr Wolfe: I talked to him like I would all the attorneys that I work with.
Mr. Brennan: What would you call me?
Dr. Wolfe: *dimpled grin* Mr. Brennan.

Ha! Lowkey burn. Oor Dr. Wolfe is quick on his feet.
I'm thinking both :)
Good on the stand, great at his job, doesn't loose his temper or train of thought.
Unlike Whiffin who has sort-of crumbled.
IMO.
 
  • #187
Now, that would be something, considering there was never any video from the night of JOK's death, IIRC.
I can't remember why, but I'm sure that someone else does.
IMO.
The neighbor who was a Canton PD officer (I don’t remember if he was retired or current) told KR’s private investigator that there was nothing picked up on the ring cam. Lots of differing opinions on whether the ring cam would have captured anything. AFAIK, neither the defense nor CW tried to get the video, although I could be wrong.

The library video, on the other hand, is much more sketchy. Two minutes of the video were ‘missing’ when turned over to the defense. The CW insists that they did not alter it in any way, which begs the question of why that data at that particular time is gone…

ETA: I guess I should say ‘any possible video’ regarding the ring cam, since in threads 19/20, there was some disagreement on whether the ring would have been filming at all that night.
 
  • #188
John O'Keefe " COULD HAVE BEEN IN THE HOUSE " per Ian Whiffen.
 
  • #189
Shifty move there by the witness. Hard to draw the truthful answer out of him as well, but Alessi managed to. JMOO
 
  • #190
The neighbor who was a Canton PD officer (I don’t remember if he was retired or current) told KR’s private investigator that there was nothing picked up on the ring cam. Lots of differing opinions on whether the ring cam would have captured anything. AFAIK, neither the defense nor CW tried to get the video, although I could be wrong.

The library video, on the other hand, is much more sketchy. Two minutes of the video were ‘missing’ when turned over to the defense. The CW insists that they did not alter it in any way, which begs the question of why that data at that particular time is gone…
Thank you, I knew that someone would remember!
 
  • #191
Exactly what my comment is referencing. And they MUST have colluded about something as a result of being on first name basis! What’s good for the goose …
I'm beyond baffled by the contradictions here—how the CW are essentially getting away with certain actions, while the defense is being crucified for doing the same. I can't think of another case that compares to these antics. Jmo.
 
  • #192
  • #193
In his professional opinion. The use of the word ‘confirmed’ is a bit overstated here.
Aaand now he just acknowledged it is possible John was in the house.
 
  • #194
  • #195
JEN
 
  • #196
Here we go this is going to be wild moo
 
  • #197
  • #198
Wow, real time - demonstration.
Impressive.
 
  • #199
  • #200
Status
Not open for further replies.

Guardians Monthly Goal

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
70
Guests online
973
Total visitors
1,043

Forum statistics

Threads
635,697
Messages
18,682,550
Members
243,362
Latest member
Bodhi Tree
Back
Top