MA - Professor Karen Read, 43, charged with murdering police officer boyfriend John O'Keefe by hitting him with car, Canton, 14 Apr 2023 #22 Retrial

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #241
Combine this with the fact that she was the one helping Kerry come up with the ‘timeline’… just plain sketchy.
I agree. If Kerry wasn't even there the night before and her and Jen just met why were those 2 creating a timeline. That makes no sense to me.
 
  • #242
BBM Nice imagery!



Like in this lovely exchange?

Brennan: Did you delete texts?
Wolfe: Yes, it was over a year ago. After a trial is over that is something i routinely do.

Brennan: So did you delete texts?
Wolfe: Yes, I already told you I did.
Brennan: No you didn’t but you did just now.

Brennan gets the same answer but still basically calls him a liar. Brennan is extremely emotional when he questions Wolfe, like it’s personal. I don’t get it.

ARCCA/Wolfe’s report was done before he ever talked to Jackson or anyone on the defense. What does Brennan’s haranguing of our dimpled doctor even accomplish?
Now he’s saying he ‘destroyed’ text messages … eye roll
 
  • #243
OK, so she called 911 after knowing it was JOK. Very odd to refer to him as "a guy" in the call.
 
  • #244
Now he’s saying he ‘destroyed’ text messages … eye roll
Brennan is... a character. I didn't know I could think an attorney to be worse than Lally.
 
  • #245
  • #246
Now he’s saying he ‘destroyed’ text messages … eye roll
Feck’s sake, he needs to get a grip. Does he really want to go there? Multiple destroyed or tossed phones, multiple deleted (sorry “destroyed”) texts, deleted footage and outright falsifying footage shown to the jury…
 
Last edited:
  • #247
ARRCA is IN!!!!!


bomb.webp
 
  • #248
Dang !!!
Judge Bev was just Busted by the Defense !
" The defendant is entitled to a fair trial"

ARCCA comes in......
 
  • #249
Alessi says that the rule is between client and attorney for saving comms. Cannone just said ‘you’re going to win this, so just let me make my ruling’. AWESOME!!!
 
  • #250
Dang !!!
Judge Bev was just Busted by the Defense !
" The defendant is entitled to a fair trial"

ARCCA comes in......
Amazing. They are allowed to testify on everything they’ve said up until yesterday!
 
  • #251
If I were CW I would not be having a good evening tonight. This is the crux of this case: there is NO evidence that JOK was certainly hit by ANY vehicle, let alone KR’s!!!
 
Last edited:
  • #252
But did I hear correctly that she wouldn’t have her written ruling unil May 7?
 
  • #253
I heard Judge Cannone say that she expects a " robust" cross exam from Brennan during the ARCCA witness' testimony. In other words.....a repeat of yesterday. All the attacking and verbal venom from Brennan will be on full display to the jury. Bring it !!!!
 
  • #254
Her JenMc say BH was there for a while. He did not leave right away.....and Jen said she called her sister BEFORE Karen picked her up to go to sister's house.
 
  • #255
But did I hear correctly that she wouldn’t have her written ruling unit May 7?
Don't know about that, but ARCCA has to provide something by that date. Maybe to do with their additional testing? JMOO
 
  • #256
When Judge C told Jackson to keep his answer short I wanted to tear my house apart. Thank goodness she then said he was going to win this so it didn’t matter what he said.
 
  • #257
But did I hear correctly that she wouldn’t have her written ruling unil May 7?
I just re-listened to be sure. She said she will issue the report may 7 - pretty sure that’s what Brennan was talking about when he said his expert was occupied with another case and didn’t have time to get through the data.
 
  • #258
When Judge C told Jackson to keep his answer short I wanted to tear my house apart. Thank goodness she then said he was going to win this so it didn’t matter what he said.
IMO when she cut him off she knew he was going to make her look bad. She said ‘How am I supposed to reconcile this?’ And his answer sounded like it was heading for ‘You don’t have to reconcile it, it’s irrelevant from a legal standpoint’
 
  • #259
IMO when she cut him off she knew he was going to make her look bad. She said ‘How am I supposed to reconcile this?’ And his answer sounded like it was heading for ‘You don’t have to reconcile it, it’s irrelevant from a legal standpoint’

Judge Bev knows that Robert Alessi knows "the law" better than anyone.
Which is why he is on the defense team by the way.
The man is a beast full of knowledge. IMO
 
  • #260
I heard Judge Cannone say that she expects a " robust" cross exam from Brennan during the ARCCA witness' testimony. In other words.....a repeat of yesterday. All the attacking and verbal venom from Brennan will be on full display to the jury. Bring it !!!!
A REAL "robust" discussion of ARCCA would include a discussion of their being hired by the FBI. Bev's idea of "robust" is letting the corrupt Norfolk County DA's office ask whatever they want but then prevent the Defense from telling the truth about ARCCA.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
134
Guests online
2,636
Total visitors
2,770

Forum statistics

Threads
632,883
Messages
18,633,049
Members
243,327
Latest member
janemot
Back
Top