MA - Professor Karen Read, 43, charged with murdering police officer boyfriend John O'Keefe by hitting him with car, Canton, 14 Apr 2023 #22 Retrial

Status
Not open for further replies.
BBM Nice imagery!



Like in this lovely exchange?

Brennan: Did you delete texts?
Wolfe: Yes, it was over a year ago. After a trial is over that is something i routinely do.

Brennan: So did you delete texts?
Wolfe: Yes, I already told you I did.
Brennan: No you didn’t but you did just now.

Brennan gets the same answer but still basically calls him a liar. Brennan is extremely emotional when he questions Wolfe, like it’s personal. I don’t get it.

ARCCA/Wolfe’s report was done before he ever talked to Jackson or anyone on the defense. What does Brennan’s haranguing of our dimpled doctor even accomplish?
Now he’s saying he ‘destroyed’ text messages … eye roll
 
Now he’s saying he ‘destroyed’ text messages … eye roll
Feck’s sake, he needs to get a grip. Does he really want to go there? Multiple destroyed or tossed phones, multiple deleted (sorry “destroyed”) texts, deleted footage and outright falsifying footage shown to the jury…
 
Last edited:
But did I hear correctly that she wouldn’t have her written ruling unil May 7?
I just re-listened to be sure. She said she will issue the report may 7 - pretty sure that’s what Brennan was talking about when he said his expert was occupied with another case and didn’t have time to get through the data.
 
When Judge C told Jackson to keep his answer short I wanted to tear my house apart. Thank goodness she then said he was going to win this so it didn’t matter what he said.
IMO when she cut him off she knew he was going to make her look bad. She said ‘How am I supposed to reconcile this?’ And his answer sounded like it was heading for ‘You don’t have to reconcile it, it’s irrelevant from a legal standpoint’
 
IMO when she cut him off she knew he was going to make her look bad. She said ‘How am I supposed to reconcile this?’ And his answer sounded like it was heading for ‘You don’t have to reconcile it, it’s irrelevant from a legal standpoint’

Judge Bev knows that Robert Alessi knows "the law" better than anyone.
Which is why he is on the defense team by the way.
The man is a beast full of knowledge. IMO
 
I heard Judge Cannone say that she expects a " robust" cross exam from Brennan during the ARCCA witness' testimony. In other words.....a repeat of yesterday. All the attacking and verbal venom from Brennan will be on full display to the jury. Bring it !!!!
A REAL "robust" discussion of ARCCA would include a discussion of their being hired by the FBI. Bev's idea of "robust" is letting the corrupt Norfolk County DA's office ask whatever they want but then prevent the Defense from telling the truth about ARCCA.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
92
Guests online
470
Total visitors
562

Forum statistics

Threads
625,627
Messages
18,507,233
Members
240,826
Latest member
barbudde
Back
Top