MA - Professor Karen Read, 43, charged with murdering police officer boyfriend John O'Keefe by hitting him with car, Canton, 14 Apr 2023 #23 Retrial

Status
Not open for further replies.
Continuing in the group text:
BA: ‘Exactly.’
JM: ‘ONG’ (meant to be OMG)
NA: ‘I assume it’s just to eat. But Brian, if she’s there, ask her what the deal is.’ (Likely referring to Julie Albert, JM says she is unsure of who ‘she’ is.)
JM: ‘To ask if we heard she is in a mental hospital.’
JM 2:55: ‘Kerry is here. Going over timeline.’ (Kerry Roberts was at JM’s house.)
BA: ‘I did hear that.’
JM: ‘And we handed the phone to Kerry.’ (Kerry Roberts, JM’s phone. JM says Proctor was on the line.)
JM 2/1/22 @2:55 PM: ‘She’s telling him EVERYTHING!’
JM @2:55: ‘All the stuff.’
MM @4:35: ‘Yep. If she pleads out, it will end. If she fights it, it will be an episode. (She = Karen).
NA: *likes* MM’s 4:35 PM text.
MM: ‘Brian, sitting separate.’
BA @4:55 PM: ‘Ok’
JM 2/1/22 @5:15PM: ‘You listening?’ Kerry Roberts was being interviewed by Proctor in Jen’s house at this time. JM says she doesn’t know who the ‘you listening’ text was directed to, but Matt was the only person in the group text AND in the house.
JM: ‘Cops here again.’
NA @ 5:23 PM: ‘Call us after.’

AJ is amazing. Such clear evidence of a cover up from the Fairview Crew, IMO. They thought Karen would roll over. No wonder the CW didn’t want these group texts allowed into evidence.
Who is MM? and wow...this sure jumps out at ya don't it???
MM @4:35: ‘Yep. If she pleads out, it will end. If she fights it, it will be an episode. (She = Karen).
 
Now AJ is talking to JM about her phone calls with JOK the night of his death. The calls ranged from 12:14 AM to 12:50 AM.
12:14 - JM calls JOK - answered - call lasts 49 seconds.
12:18:47 - JOK calls JM - answered - call lasts 36 seconds.
12:29:44 - JM calls JOK - answered - call lasted 7 seconds. JM denies THIS call, although she does not deny the other 2.
12:41:10 - JM calls JOK - missed
12:41:59 - JM calls JOK - missed
12:43:19 - JM calls JOK - missed
12:46:16 - JM calls JOK - missed
12:47:52 - JM calls JOK - missed
12:50:47 - JM calls JOK - missed

Why call him SEVEN times? Also, I believe this puts to rest whether or not the call went through, since the record is showing which calls were answered and which were missed. MOO though. So why acknowledge 12:14 and 12:18 but deny the 12:27 call?
At the last trial, Jen claimed the 12:27 call and ALL SEVEN MISSED CALLS a butt dial. Ridiculous.

AJ says an extraction was done on JM’s phone and the ‘butt dials’ were NOT on her phone. They were, however, on JOK’s. She deleted her calls. I wonder if her butt deleted those, too!
 
Unlike AK who took the fifth, JMc did not. She has nothing to hide. She really should have taken the fifth, though. I suspect she wants to support John O'Keefe's memory and his family. moo


In addition, the defendant, refused to take the stand in trial one.
And yet again, I say, so what? And again, this is a fallacy - this time a red herring. Whether or not KR wants to testify doesn’t change that JM is clearly not a credible witness.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
132
Guests online
3,652
Total visitors
3,784

Forum statistics

Threads
622,514
Messages
18,451,152
Members
240,054
Latest member
Zelian73
Back
Top