MA - Professor Karen Read, 43, charged with murdering police officer boyfriend John O'Keefe by hitting him with car, Canton, 14 Apr 2023 #27 Retrial

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #881
Man, these experts should have really studied these Defense attorneys before they accepted to do this case for the CW. Alessi is trashing their credibility as witnesses. There is no amount of money worth having your credibility destroyed.
The Prosecution should have really gotten out ahead of this if they wanted to use this guy - this really looks like Brennan et al are the type that really arent prepared - speaks volumes IMO
 
  • #882
This is making me feel bad for Burgess
Yes, I don't know why these people put themselves in the hot seat. Maybe his company made him do it because he was the best they had which isn't saying much?
 
  • #883
  • #884
Is he turning red? This is brutal.
And its just started !!! Brennan left this guy unprotected - this should have all been worked out before he testified, JMO
 
  • #885
  • #886
He believes people don’t look at the info??? Just posts?? ………


eta talking about linked in profiles
 
  • #887
Yes, I don't know why these people put themselves in the hot seat. Maybe his company made him do it because he was the best they had which isn't saying much?
Yes, he works for them and he was sent to this.
 
  • #888
How could CW put him on the stand, wouldn’t they know this???
 
  • #889
So THIS is the big witness that the CW is using to obliterate the Defense ?? They would have been better off with trooper paul!! He doesn't even have a degree?? What an EPIC Failure!!

 
  • #890
Wowzers!!!!
if you have linked in you can go directly to his page - says he has a degree - crazy they did not clean this up - so sloppy JMO
 
  • #891
And its just started !!! Brennan left this guy unprotected - this should have all been worked out before he testified, JMO
Which goes to say that Brennan doesn't give a rats 🤬🤬🤬 about SB or any other of his experts. Shame on you Mr. B. MOO
 
  • #892
He says it’s an error on his LinkedIn… but he drafted and posted the CV on his LinkedIn. Maybe an intentional error MOO
 
  • #893
At this point I have lost count - how many CW witnesses have been taken to the wood shed so far?
 
  • #894
How could CW put him on the stand, wouldn’t they know this???
No interest in any of them, CW. Just a company that was to prove times for the CW. IMO
 
  • #895
I don't even know what to think now lol This is uncomfortable to watch.

"Experts" always get questioned about their qualifications, but this is just bad bad bad. How in the world did he think this would go unnoticed. I wonder how many times he has testified in court?

Crazy.
 
  • #896
Yes, he works for them and he was sent to this.
But also, he clearly misrepresented himself. Not every employer verifies education - seems to be the situation in this case IMO.
 
  • #897
  • #898
His CV on LinkedIn showed he studied 2016-2018 for the nonexistent BS. He says it was an expected graduation date at the time he uploaded the CV (but it says he obtained the degree?)
 
  • #899
  • #900
He's been terribly red for at least 15 min.. awful.
Is he being paid individually by the hour? Or is Aperture profiting? Both? I assume he is well reimbursed as an individual? Perhaps Aperture is paid for the research whilst he received his usual wage and he is paid for his time on the stand?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
99
Guests online
2,292
Total visitors
2,391

Forum statistics

Threads
633,464
Messages
18,642,611
Members
243,551
Latest member
Just_Peeking
Back
Top