Changing the facts in those bullet points STILL doesn't make the theory fact tooParroting prosecution bullet points doesn't turn theory into fact. MOO

IMO
Changing the facts in those bullet points STILL doesn't make the theory fact tooParroting prosecution bullet points doesn't turn theory into fact. MOO
But unfortunately for the CW, JOK was never hit by KRs car.
- KR admitted being angry with John. She’s extremely intoxicated.
- Digital data (GPS and Apple Health Data) are clear that John did not go inside 34F.
- John got out of the Lexus
- The Lexus pulled forward
- Backup maneuver (53 ft) occurred between 12:32:04 AM and 12:32:12 AM
- 74% throttle hitting John
- John's (Apple Health Data) locked at 12:32:09
- Broken taillight (its possible to break taillight - courtesy of defense team via RR)
- John’s injuries are consistent with being struck by Lexus, hitting hard ground.
- She said "I know I said, I hit him.”
- The Karen clips: self explanatory.
- At the February 2, 2022, bond hearing attorney DY advised: my client KR had no criminal intent, it was an accident.
- In addition, KR herself told media: I asked David, what if I clipped him in the knee and he passed out and or went to care for himself and he threw up or passed out and David said, ‘Yeah then you have some element of culpability.’ So that's how I thought about things for about three days.
- And... to avoid culpability she hasn't stopped blaming everybody and anybody. Takes no accountability.
My own opinion as well as court testimony and news articles
I keep forgetting that.And to shatter the taillight into more pieces than actually belong to that specific taillight. JMOO
I'm putting closed captions on as I can't listen to Brennan's whiny, pesky, voice anymore.I am so done listening to Brennan but I think this next cross will be interesting.
Dr R obviously much smarter in all of this than Brennan.
So Brennan will try to get under Dr. R's skin and have Dr R get off his details/lash back at him
Dr R has to be used to slimy lawyers at this point in his career but Hank's is a special kind of nasty.
Hank telling Dr R "over here" look at me like snapping his fingers - YIKES
I am not sure Dr R will abide with that.
JMO
And all the medical examiners who have the highest degree of education are wrong? Nope! IMO
- KR admitted being angry with John. She’s extremely intoxicated.
- Digital data (GPS and Apple Health Data) are clear that John did not go inside 34F.
- John got out of the Lexus
- The Lexus pulled forward
- Backup maneuver (53 ft) occurred between 12:32:04 AM and 12:32:12 AM
- 74% throttle hitting John
- John's (Apple Health Data) locked at 12:32:09
- Broken taillight (its possible to break taillight - courtesy of defense team via RR)
- John’s injuries are consistent with being struck by Lexus, hitting hard ground.
- She said "I know I said, I hit him.”
- The Karen clips: self explanatory.
- At the February 2, 2022, bond hearing attorney DY advised: my client KR had no criminal intent, it was an accident.
- In addition, KR herself told media: I asked David, what if I clipped him in the knee and he passed out and or went to care for himself and he threw up or passed out and David said, ‘Yeah then you have some element of culpability.’ So that's how I thought about things for about three days.
- And... to avoid culpability she hasn't stopped blaming everybody and anybody. Takes no accountability.
My own opinion as well as court testimony and news articles
If he says details matter one more time! Ugh!Okay... so as a juror...
Brennan's demeanor yesterday with Dr. L.. and his demeanor with Dr. R....
what would you think????
I can't believe the items Brennan is asking about. This has nothing to do with the facts of the case. Experts confer with their clients. What is his point?OMG!!! He had a ham sandwich!!! KR must be guilty!!!
Ham sandwich...If he says details matter one more time! Ugh!