VERDICT WATCH MA - Professor Karen Read, 43, charged with murdering police officer boyfriend John O'Keefe by hitting him with car, Canton, 14 Apr 2023 #35 Retrial

[kuromiiiilove]

Yes, the data matches perfectly to a drop off. The data does not show a collision.

 

[themonk]

Wow, what bs. So now we got BH in the garage w/dog. Such bs. So many falsehoods by Jackson.
He's confusing the jurors. So I guess by lying it doesnt matter, anything to free the client. jmo

I really don't know where you are coming from.

 

[missy1974]

News flash Hank - being drunk isn’t a crime.

To be fair... if you are driving it is, isn't it?

They ALL did it though it seems... JMO

 

[mzmarymac]

Side note: It has always bothered me when I hear prosecutors and/or low enforcement drive home the fact that "this crime is so heinous" or "the victim was such a great person" or "the defendant is such a horrible person."

None of that matters. We can all agree on those facts. But it proves nothing. None of that matters if you have the wrong person.

 

[LvsAMystry]

Is it me or does Brennan evoke the teacher in a Peanuts cartoon

 

[mzmarymac]

To be fair... if you are driving it is, isn't it?

They ALL did it though it seems... JMO

And passively, JOK, a police officer with 2 young kids to raise, chose to have her be her ride while seeing her drinking and signing that bill.

 

[missy1974]

And passively, JOK, a police officer with 2 young kids to raise, chose to have her be her ride while seeing her drinking and signing that bill.

Agree.. he got in the car too.

 

[missy1974]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1933547413295542767

 

[Wishbone]

The physical evidence doesn't support what he is saying.

 

[jepop]

So let me get this straight, when the Commonwealth strings together guesses, speculation, and “maybe this happened” for two years, it’s gospel. But when the defense lays out an alternate timeline based on their own evidence, witness testimony, and reasonable doubt, it’s suddenly “lies” and “confusing the jury”?

That’s literally what defense attorneys are supposed to do in a criminal trial. Challenge the narrative, expose contradictions, and show the jury that the prosecution hasn’t proven their case beyond a reasonable doubt. If you’re mad the jury is confused, maybe ask why the state didn’t give them a clean, consistent story with actual evidence.

MOO

Yes. And the jury isn't confused anyway IMO . They know for a certainty BARD that there was no collision. Nothing could be clearer. Jackson is right, if they fulfill their sworn duty they have to acquit. Nothing confusing about that. Jmo

 

[katykat]

Jackson is using the exact same 2nd degree murder boulder analogy Jackson used back in the famous Spector murder trial! Wonder if he did a bit of research on that one.

 

[Forest_Wood]

So Brennan gives an example from a completely different scenario rather than focus on the case at hand. He's really trying to play on the juror's emotions.
MOO

 

[themonk]

I find myself becoming sleepy

 

[LvsAMystry]

This is all fine well and good Hank, but there was NO collision

 

[Soulmagent]

News flash Hank - being drunk isn’t a crime.

Well how come I have been arrested for it!
lmao

 

[Younger Sister]

The physical evidence doesn't support what he is saying.

IMO...he is a habitual liar. He continues to fabricate a scenario that just does not exist and ignores the facts. I keep reminding myself he is a legend in his own mind which is his downfall.

 

[LvsAMystry]

I find myself becoming sleepy

I’ll allow it

 

[lohrtabitha]

Chriiiiist AJ, this closing cannot be matched. What a talent. Passionate because truth is on his side. The jury have to be ingesting and believing him. Ng.

He is the best attorney I have ever witnessed in my lifetime and Alessi right behind him.

 

[themonk]

IMO...he is a habitual liar. He continues to fabricate a scenario that just does not exist and ignores the facts. I keep reminding myself he is a legend in his own mind which is his downfall.

Turd polisher

 

[Derph]

brennan has the passion of a cinder block. About as riveting and compelling as one too.