and do not forget IMO the combative/unbelievable Kelly Deaver "false memory" testimony".
should of course be FRIDAY.
The judge seemed more than willing to add it to the jury instructions... I was surprised lol
I think it's quite normal for a co-counsel to argue motions like this. Don't completely take my word for it though IANAL.
Pretty sure I heard something about it....maybe just the texts between KR and Higgy?
Oh yes, and BC just said that Kayley brought it up. I was referring to having a witness testify like they did last trial, with the sisters proclaiming what happened.
Did Chloe make much of an appearance this time? I can't remember.
Me too!
I just remember hearing her name is now cora
I recall it coming up in YB's testimony. And a note/letter or something from the vet? but it was very vague IIRC
What exactly does this mean?
It means the CW is no longer asking the judge to tell the jury that certain actions by Karen Read (like fleeing, lying, hiding evidence, etc.) could be interpreted as signs she knew she was guilty. Consciousness of guilt instruction is usually used to frame behavior (like deleting texts, calling a lawyer, acting frantic) as suspicious or incriminating. By pulling back that request, the CW is basically conceding that they can’t confidently argue she acted like someone who knew she committed a crime. They basically just admitted they don’t have a strong case for claiming her behavior after John’s death proves she knew she was guilty.
