VERDICT WATCH MA - Professor Karen Read, 43, charged with murdering police officer boyfriend John O'Keefe by hitting him with car, Canton, 14 Apr 2023 #35 Retrial


I'm no fan of TB but I do find it sad that this Court banned a journalist from being present on any date certain individuals were present because they were allegedly intimidated by him.

Seems a Judge (3-day bench trial) determined two of these individuals conspired with TB's former GF in Jan 2024 to keep TB from attending the trial and then tried to send him back to jail within days of his release (for violating a PCO). He never went to jail, and today was found not guilty of violating the restraining order.

IMO, this seems to follow the CW's best effort to indict KR on witness intimidation charges --desperate to mirror her to TB's case but the grand jury wasn't having it. Seems Hank B was especially interested in the trial's outcome -- and was reportedly attending via Zoom.
Thanks for posting. I am not a TB follower so I did not know that… who else but Jennifer Mcabe was in the thick of this too.
So much for the ridiculous “ I’m Just a Mom”.
More like “I’m just a Psycho”. IMO

BBM
The case stems from Kearney attending a Karen Read hearing in January of 2024 where Bradl contends Lindsey Gaetani conspired with Paul O'Keefe and Jennifer McCabe to "flush Kearney" from the courtroom and send him back to jail, just days after he had been released.
 

I'm no fan of TB but I do find it sad that this Court banned a journalist from being present on any date certain individuals were present because they were allegedly intimidated by him.

Seems a Judge (3-day bench trial) determined two of these individuals conspired with TB's former GF in Jan 2024 to keep TB from attending the trial and then tried to send him back to jail within days of his release (for violating a PCO). He never went to jail, and today was found not guilty of violating the restraining order.

IMO, this seems to follow the CW's best effort to indict KR on witness intimidation charges --desperate to mirror her to TB's case but the grand jury wasn't having it. Seems Hank B was especially interested in the trial's outcome -- and was reportedly attending via Zoom.
I’m also not a fan of TB and haven’t really followed the story about his court case until yesterday. Very interesting to see that a couple of the players from Karen’s case had involvement in his.
 
No frostbite and no Wischnewsky ulcers. After nearly 6 hours in freezing temperatures, snow lashing down, no coat, no medical intervention whatsoever.
How long does it take for you to get frostbite?

When it’s freezing outside, you can get frostbite within 30 minutes, especially if the wind chill is at −15 F or lower. If the temperature outside is 5 F with strong winds, you can get frostbite after being outside for less than an hour.

What temperatures can cause frostbite?

Frostbite can occur when the temperature drops to 5 F or below.



Testimony from Robert Gilman about the temperatures that night -


AL: Can you describe to the jury or lay out for the jury the temperature readings throughout that period of time that you analysed.

RG: Yes. I’ll start with the 26th and just go without going through more than just the day high and low, a high of 28, a low of 12, on the 27th the high was 27 and the low was just 9 degrees Fahrenheit, on the 28th Friday the high temperature reached 36 and the low was 22, and then on Saturday the 29th the high temperature was 29 the low was down to 15.

AL: Now sir if I could ask you specifically within that time period, specific time period, of approximately 1.30am on the 29th through 5am on the 29th, what does the data demonstrate with respect to the air temperature during that period?

RG: From 1.30 to 5.30?

AL: Yes please.

RG: On the 29th I’ll consult this data from Norwood airport if that’s the way we should look at this, I would suggest to do that. At 1.30 the temperature was 31, by 5.53 in the morning it was down to 24 degrees.

 
I mentioned in an earlier post that this was the first trial I’ve watched/followed from beginning to end, so I need to ask if it’s normal for a DA to make a statement like this about 5 weeks before a murder trial? It seems to me as though he’s trying to poison his potential jury. IMO, he lied about the ME reporting the injuries on JOK’s arm
DA Morrissey said that the ME concluded those injuries were caused by blunt force trauma, but this is her actual testimony: Scordi-Bello described the arm injuries as scrapes or scratches, but said there was no exposed fat or muscle. She said because there was no depth to the injuries, she did not make any notes about their depth. Scordi-Bello said she does not have an opinion on how those injuries may have occurred.
Source: Karen Read trial jury shown graphic photos of John O'Keefe's injuries
Link to DA Morrissey’s statement ~5 weeks prior to trial 1:
BBM
Moo
 
I mentioned in an earlier post that this was the first trial I’ve watched/followed from beginning to end, so I need to ask if it’s normal for a DA to make a statement like this about 5 weeks before a murder trial? It seems to me as though he’s trying to poison his potential jury. IMO, he lied about the ME reporting the injuries on JOK’s arm
DA Morrissey said that the ME concluded those injuries were caused by blunt force trauma, but this is her actual testimony: Scordi-Bello described the arm injuries as scrapes or scratches, but said there was no exposed fat or muscle. She said because there was no depth to the injuries, she did not make any notes about their depth. Scordi-Bello said she does not have an opinion on how those injuries may have occurred.
Source: Karen Read trial jury shown graphic photos of John O'Keefe's injuries
Link to DA Morrissey’s statement ~5 weeks prior to trial 1:
BBM
Moo
YO!
I did not know I could even feel this ill. This is gross. IMO.
and no. never have I seen anything like this!

Then we have 14:10 in this court TV YT link that shows pretty plainly this dude commentating is very afraid. He probably has abused his position, did things he can get "in trouble for" you can see him sweating in the video . why? If he didnt know nothing he would not be making such bold claims ,so he is covering.IMO.
 
Last edited:
Interesting fact: April 1st, jury selection began, and jury deliberations most likely to begin on Friday the 13th.
“It's Only A Movie” inscription on John’s headstone

The timeline:
The defendant and John arrived in front of 34F all the way to the west side in a dark corner near a flag pole.

John got out of the Lexus, he stood by the side of the road after an argument with the defendant.
That argument, that anger fueled by heavy intoxication.

We learned from the science and the data...

The defendant in her Lexus drove away, at less 35 feet away.
She stopped and she put the Lexus in neutral… and she waited ...
She then put the Lexus in reverse…. (approx. 24 mph) and accelerated to 74% throttle (striking/sideswipe/clipping action)

The tires spun (theres a dusting of snow) and she went backwards possibly 70 ft
Vehicle strike him, he fell backwards, hit his head hard on the ground, he broke his skull, left to lay by the flag pole to die in the snow. Lying on top of his cellphone alone. John stopped moving for the last time.


Digital data showed John never entered 34F. The temperature of the phone went down from the time that the defendant KR left him at 34F which is evidence that the phone never went inside 34F. The phone stayed outside, because the phone stayed cold.

Aperture paired the Lexus data with John’s phone.

Back up maneuver 12:32:04 to 12:32:12 (does not represent backing maneuver has ended, just that the recorded data has ended)
John’s phone locked 12:32:09


Additionally, there are:
Microscopic pieces of taillight embedded in John’s clothing
Karen Clips (she’s happy to express to media about what happened, but is not interested in telling the jurors)

-- Clips (only a few, there are many more)
"He didnt look mortally wounded as far as I could see.”
“And I was looking to see him on the side of the road. I was expecting I'd find him.” "Maybe I did something.”
"I hit him, I hit him, I hit him”

5 AM phone call: Kerry, John is dead



Defense didnt even challenge the digital data.
"The data is what the data is” — Karen Read

Defense:
There was no collision
Poor police investigation failed to investigate other potential suspects

All gone by the wayside, defense has pushed, some for years:

2:27 AM google search
Third party culprit
Lost evidence
Flights of stairs
Basement theory
Missing witness instruction

And about ARCCA…
ARCCA showed that it’s absolutely possible for a Lexus taillight to break.
ARCCA: There is no evidence of a pedestrian strike.
Did the jury notice ARCCA's word choices when they spoke during testimony.
A bit of funny: Pig DNA solved: AR planted the pig DNA (ham sandwich)

As ADA Lally said yesterday defense witnesses exhibited “bias and advocacy.”

MOO


Edit: CW opening stmt
 
Last edited:
Thanks for posting. I am not a TB follower so I did not know that… who else but Jennifer Mcabe was in the thick of this too.
So much for the ridiculous “ I’m Just a Mom”.
More like “I’m just a Psycho”. IMO

BBM
The case stems from Kearney attending a Karen Read hearing in January of 2024 where Bradl contends Lindsey Gaetani conspired with Paul O'Keefe and Jennifer McCabe to "flush Kearney" from the courtroom and send him back to jail, just days after he had been released.

I went down the Turtle hole last night... got half way and turned back.. the drama lol Kudo's to Paul O'Keefe for telling the truth though.

From what little I do know, others should face consequences. IMO
 
Well, that was super-interesting. The defence moved yesterday for a beefed-up jury instruction on the hoodie business. They obviously aren’t satisfied with the modest one they got 1st time round & probably feel (rightly IMO) they dropped the ball when Brennan was pulling off his stunt with Wolf. Interestingly, the judge observed they didn’t object at the time & Alessi responded saying they couldn’t see properly while Brennan held the shirt up to the witness.

This excuse is inadequate IMO. They could have intervened to ask what he was showing but they didn’t. They were caught off guard & failed to react & the issue has clearly been gnawing away since.

I haven’t seen the ruling on the motion. Anyone better informed?
That kind of reasoning is like saying a wife should have known her abusive husband was going to smack her out of the blue. Have to stay alert and prepared 24/7, or else!
It's not the job of the defense to prevent Brennan from pulling dirty unethical stunts. The defense didn't cause Brennan to perform his stunt. Brennan is the one at fault - not the defense team.
MOO
 
I mentioned in an earlier post that this was the first trial I’ve watched/followed from beginning to end, so I need to ask if it’s normal for a DA to make a statement like this about 5 weeks before a murder trial? It seems to me as though he’s trying to poison his potential jury. IMO, he lied about the ME reporting the injuries on JOK’s arm
DA Morrissey said that the ME concluded those injuries were caused by blunt force trauma, but this is her actual testimony: Scordi-Bello described the arm injuries as scrapes or scratches, but said there was no exposed fat or muscle. She said because there was no depth to the injuries, she did not make any notes about their depth. Scordi-Bello said she does not have an opinion on how those injuries may have occurred.
Source: Karen Read trial jury shown graphic photos of John O'Keefe's injuries
Link to DA Morrissey’s statement ~5 weeks prior to trial 1:
BBM
Moo
That is odd IMO
 

I'm no fan of TB but I do find it sad that this Court banned a journalist from being present on any date certain individuals were present because they were allegedly intimidated by him.

Seems a Judge (3-day bench trial) determined two of these individuals conspired with TB's former GF in Jan 2024 to keep TB from attending the trial and then tried to send him back to jail within days of his release (for violating a PCO). He never went to jail, and today was found not guilty of violating the restraining order.

IMO, this seems to follow the CW's best effort to indict KR on witness intimidation charges --desperate to mirror her to TB's case but the grand jury wasn't having it. Seems Hank B was especially interested in the trial's outcome -- and was reportedly attending via Zoom.
Thank God justice prevailed in this case for him. CONSPIRATION here and in Karen's case.
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
89
Guests online
434
Total visitors
523

Forum statistics

Threads
625,538
Messages
18,505,873
Members
240,811
Latest member
seanbrwh
Back
Top