Was it proven that Karen did a reverse manoeuvre at 34 Fairview? Some are stating that as a fact but I wasn't convinced it happened like that. It seemed as though she did one 3-pt turn when she took a wrong turn on her way there.
Not sure about the 3 pointer, I believe that happened on Cedar crest ( event 1162-1) after KR first missed the turn into Fairview, so c12.23x secs. BUT moo what is not proven, by any means, is that if there was a reverse event (1162-2), it happened infront of 34 Fairview.
Burgess and Welcher, using the VHR (?) data, cannot prove location for the Lexus, they can only suggest times.
Pre Burgess time drift alterations, where was the Lexus at 12.31xseconds? According to the data as testified to by Burgess, the Lexus could have
been anywhere within a 0.9 mile radius of 1162-1 when the trigger event indicating a reverse occurred. IMO
So what makes more sense,?? First up, we already know from injuries vs tail light, this collision scenario is completely unrealistic, it's really not possible. So it bugs the bayjaysus out of me to even feel obliged to advance an IMO more probable location theory for the lexus, when Brennan offered the sum total of zero evidence that a collision physically took place ( zero medical evidence and a flawed 'accident reconstruction' theory that has those shards doing physically impossible things to JO's right arm). Jmo
I credit another poster (cannot recall name,) for bringing this to my attention. They used the map to show that at 12.31xsecs it makes more sense for a reverse to happen on the way back to Meadows; more precisely a wrong turn off Chapman, a reverse back and then on KR goes to Meadows, connecting with the wifi at 12.36xsecs. so, KR leaves no.34 at or just before 12.30am. This makes her travel time to Meadows from 34 F closer to six minutes, realistic as I understand it for road conditions at the time. Jmo
The CW,'s theory, even before time-drift by Burgess, is dodgy travel time wise, with KR having to speed back to meadows in under five mins to connect to meadows wifi at 12.36xsecs.
And as I understand it, with Burgesses' time drift theory and the cw wanting to make 1162-2 happen at 12.32x secs, well how in heck did KR get back to Meadows in four minutes??? Under Burgess' new data interpretation to fit with Whiffen, it
still makes far more sense that the reverse happened as posited above, ie on the trip back to Meadows to make the 12.36 wifi connection more realistic.Jmo.
* Aside. Imo Matt di Sorgha's testimony sewed doubt into Burgesses data re the number of possible x second time ranges within which the reversing event could have taken place. Even with the time drift Burgess was trying to sell, most of the equally probable x sec time ranges occurred prior to JO's last phone use and steps, ie before 12.31.38
Jmo, Burgess, Welcher and Whiffen combined have not gone anywhere near proving BARD that KR is guilty of any of the charges. All three involve the Lexus being instrumental in JO's death and the ' data' as some sort of stand alone circumstantial evidence from which to draw inference is nowhere close, either before or after considering the scientific, physical and medical evidence to the contrary. Jmo