I think the dark grey material is masking the bloodstains. Either the color, or perhaps it's less absorbent than the light grey.
Even areas of heavy staining, like the left upper back show no blood in the dark grey sections.
MA - Professor Karen Read, 43, charged with murdering police officer boyfriend John O'Keefe by hitting him with car, Canton, 14 Apr 2023 #6
- Thread starter Bishop Black
- Start date
- Status
Even areas of heavy staining, like the left upper back show no blood in the dark grey sections.
Trademark? As in good for Defense or the prosecutor?
PLAY-BY-PLAY FROM DAY 19 OF TESTIMONY:
2:25 p.m.
Live video, updates: Maureen Hartnett, forensic scientist takes stand in Karen Read murder trial
2:25 p.m.
- AJ asking about pieces of glass found on the bumper during Harnett’s search. The car was towed to Canton PD from Dighton before Harnett examined it. AJ: according to your notes the glass pieces would have traveled 60 miles in a snowstorm before you saw it?
- He asks the same question about the hair. “The hair would have made the same 60-mile roundtrip in a blizzard?”
Live video, updates: Maureen Hartnett, forensic scientist takes stand in Karen Read murder trial
Live video, updates: Maureen Hartnett, forensic scientist takes stand in Karen Read murder trial
When I watched this about that hair, that was lifted with tweezers, no resistance, and it was not in my mind anymore about how KR drove to DIGHTON the next day, never mind how she DROVE back to JO's house after supposedly smashing into him and getting a hair ON her SUV. I can 'afford' to not even think of these drives, BUT SOME PEOPLE could not and they did. Are you all stunned? (unless you remembered the drives and impossible for a hair and glass pieces remain on the car/bumper before lawyer brought it up)
@BienickWCVB
Vaillier examined pieces of plastic submitted by state police investigators and tried to piece them together.
Vaillier examined pieces of plastic submitted by state police investigators and tried to piece them together.
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2023
- Messages
- 2,848
- Reaction score
- 24,803
This is also simply quite amazing.So all the blood collection was for naught. Hartnett only took swabs from a single cup and then they never even tested the swabs.
Perhaps IMO another timeline in this case might be interesting. Starting with the timing of the evening out; events surrounding JOK ‘missing’; when he was located; when evidence collection began at the residence; when evidence collection was completed at the residence (including apparent return to find the taillight lens shards?); when evidence was collected in the apparent police location or impound lot of the Lexus; when the case was assembled; when charges were brought, etc. Each event should include the date, time, and individual(s) associated with each event. And superimposed on all of the above the phone calls and timing of all involved, witnesses (those called and those not called), and the investigators.
And for clarity….. I am not an avowed or customary conspiracy theory advocate. Just perplexed by what is being seen and heard in this case. MOO
The 'magically delicious' sprinkled tail light pieces aren't having much of an effect on the jury I fear. I wonder if they have already bought the tainted and corrupted crime scene by now.
Along with the very conflicted and corrupt lead investigator.
Along with the very conflicted and corrupt lead investigator.
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
- Locked
- Locked
- Locked
Online statistics
- Members online
- 141
- Guests online
- 3,257
- Total visitors
- 3,398