MA - Professor Karen Read, 43, charged with murdering police officer boyfriend John O'Keefe by hitting him with car, Canton, 14 Apr 2023 #9

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #361
I would be very surprised if the other search was done on a new tab. “How long does it take to digest food” was 6:23:49 “How long ti die in ckld” was at 6:23:51 and “hos long to die in cold” was at 6:24:18. Those are in pretty quick succession and would be strange for her to Google the first 2 in a new tab and then switch over to the older tab for the 3rd search.

I’ve barely heard about the search about digesting food. Was she questioned about that?

Not really sure why she would search that ???
 
  • #362
  • #363
Wait, I thought today's juror was engaged to be married and it was only for personal reasons she had to leave.
But maybe I missed something?
LOL I saw that earlier too. I think the person meant that the juror was engaged in the testimony throughout the case. Not engaged to be married. At least I think.
 
  • #364
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
  • #365
I’ve barely heard about the search about digesting food. Was she questioned about that?

Not really sure why she would search that ???
TBH I'd be really nervous if someone ever grabbed my laptop and cell phone to take a look at some of the stuff I search for, especially when I am following along with some of these court cases. LOL! (I suspect some of you might have some questionable stuff in your search histories as well.)
 
  • #366
I’ve barely heard about the search about digesting food. Was she questioned about that?

Not really sure why she would search that ???
I think it was stated that was one of the suggestions google gives when you start typing in a search, not something she actually searched for.
 
  • #367
I’ve barely heard about the search about digesting food. Was she questioned about that?

Not really sure why she would search that ???
She said that was an Apple suggestion for the search when she typed in "hos long to di"
 
  • #368
I love how educated this witness is.
She has a great attitude.

It's becoming clear there are multiple ways to view data on the phone itself.
But wouldn't it be more accurate to view data directly from google's server?
I love this witness! Her personality is fun and endearing while at the same time professional, well-informed, and non-confrontational with Yanetti.

She is the kind of gal I’d want on my team for Trivia Night at the pub. I bet she’s a hoot outside the courtroom.
 
  • #369
And Yanetti answers my question for me and brings up a good point, she was told not to look at anything else and it would be theoretically possible that could have been made even earlier than 2:27, on 2:27, of after 2:27
 
  • #370
@JHall7news


The court TV fee dis back up. Enjoy. After a break, ADA Lally has ended his questioning of the digital forensic expert Jessica Hyde.

Witness Jessica Hyde is on the stand and on TV. She is being cross examined. "There is no indication of a google search at or before 2:27 am." There is no evidence... #karenread Det Tully gave her a limited scope for her analysis.

1718382185690.png
 
  • #371
I’ve barely heard about the search about digesting food. Was she questioned about that?

Not really sure why she would search that ???
the expert said that it was a Google search suggestion. It seems kind of unclear if she actually clicked on it or not? I would think she had to for it to show up in the search history.

I do believe that testimony since she googled “how long ti die in clkd” 2 seconds later. So clearly she wasn’t interested in the results about digesting food.
 
  • #372
@BienickWCVB

David Yannetti begins cross-examination of Hyde. Asks if it's possible that the google search could have been done at 2:27am. Hyde says no indication of a Google search at that time.


12:21 PM · Jun 14, 2024
 
  • #373
Oh look another bald cop.
 
  • #374
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
  • #375
Well finally we get to the accident reconstruction
 
  • #376
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
  • #377
Oh look another bald cop.
I think all these bald cops/troopers etc. and going to blend into the memory of the jurors. The CW entire case is a bunch if lying bald guys.
 
  • #378
Well finally we get to the accident reconstruction
I HOPE, I hope he is unbiased and CLEAR. The JMc phone thing now p'd me off to see that she didn't google at that time it seems. This trooper better make it clear one way or another, with detailed proof that is non deniable...sigh.
 
  • #379
@JHall7news

Next up is the accident reconstruction segment - Trooper Joseph Paul is on the stand. He's with the CARS unit - collision analysis and reconstruction section

1718382842818.png
 
  • #380
@BienickWCVB

The courtroom camera has been turned back on. Testimony resumes with Trooper Joe Paul, an crash reconstructionist who says he has investigated 196 crashes including about 55 involving pedestrians.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
60
Guests online
1,863
Total visitors
1,923

Forum statistics

Threads
632,803
Messages
18,631,886
Members
243,297
Latest member
InternalExile
Back
Top