There is a legal difference between an abductor & an accomplice.Detective Chief Inspector Andy Redwood @22.54: "We're almost certain now this sighting is not the abductor".
There is a legal difference between an abductor & an accomplice.Detective Chief Inspector Andy Redwood @22.54: "We're almost certain now this sighting is not the abductor".
There is a legal difference between an abductor & an accomplice.
I think it relates more to whether CB had anyone who helped/advised him how to get opportunities to act on those urges. At least that’s what I’m interpreting is meant here by mentor, someone more experienced who could help him get away with bad stuff. If he did, I don’t think it’s BPThis 'mentor' theory.
What is meant by that?
I really don't understand why CB would have had or have needed a mentor.
IMO he would have acted on his own sexual urges and sexual fantasies that would have been specific to him and his own personality.
Nobody can mentor someone how to FEEL, let alone act on those feelings.
Mendel is right!
Let's be honest! What kid (!) by the age of nineteen, decides to got to portugal, and than drifts for at least 20 years?!
I think it relates more to whether CB had anyone who helped/advised him how to get opportunities to act on those urges. At least that’s what I’m interpreting is meant here by mentor, someone more experienced who could help him get away with bad stuff. If he did, I don’t think it’s BP
"he might" is not the same as "we know" though is it? Indeed, he might be. He might also have just been a friend. Or CB might have had something over him which explains his good deeds. Or he might just be a thoroughly nice guy, willing to help people in need. Or CB might just have been using BP and his stable reputation (in comparison to his other acquaintances) for his own ends. They might just be criminal partners. I wouldn't be so bold as to say I "know" which (if any) of these are true since there is currently not enough evidence available to say.Mentor is not a very precise term. If there was one, BP might be the one in my opinion as I explained. If you have a better hypothesis please move forward.
"he might" is not the same as "we know" though is it? Indeed, he might be. He might also have just been a friend. Or CB might have had something over him which explains his good deeds. Or he might just be a thoroughly nice guy, willing to help people in need. Or CB might just have been using BP and his stable reputation (in comparison to his other acquaintances) for his own ends. They might just be criminal partners. I wouldn't be so bold as to say I "know" which (if any) of these are true since there is currently not enough evidence available to say.
Super, when did I say that? Are you ironic or something? If that's a joke you have a LMFAO.
If he has another FB could you or someone send me it please?That man must be nuts, but it would be nice checking his secret FB.
Nothing that i have ever said or wrote has been ironic, dear Mendel!!!
Everything i put in here was a result of a father of two children, who could imagine that losing one of them might be the worst experience, to imagine. And also i was as a former prosecuter.
I will take my assumptions out for some time by now! I think that fits, because the case is special.
According to HCW, let us keep assuming after 2021!
I'm concerned, that this case will lead to an end, just to bring peace to the parents.
Sure @tedtink! Well, I'll try....obviously I'm not a native English speaker nor fluent. My English is not that good, but I'll do my best!Great!
Thanks for posting.
Can you help with translation on Friday evening please?
As a respectful father perhaps you should clean my name from something not authored by me.
It's understandable that you may be upset because I asked you for a link you didn't offer, but again please act like a respectful father.
It makes sense if MM was targeted and the routine of the Tapas group was noted. It seems she was targeted and taken almost as soon as GM left the apartment. The group went back and forth, back and forth all week, never diverting that same route (out into the streets) Just in, out and back to their table. It makes sense to me for a professional burglar/abductor to enter via the window and leave via the front door, out onto the street (albeit, into a vehicle) moving away from the Tapas Bar. MM also conveniently vanished at a time when other adults were on the same street after collecting children from OC Crèche. Nobody would have really 'stood out' But blended right in IMO XLikely yes!
But what, maybe professional abductor, would carry the victim around town at "primetime"? Does it make sense?
But at present CB is safely behind bars. He can't harm anyone and he can't escape. So there is no immediate imperative to charge and huge incentive to keep building a case before it has to go to the defence lawyer.
I think FF is preparing his defence of CB, and to do that he is looking for enough evidence that someone else could be guilty to provide reasonable doubt.
"It is not comprehensible how a public prosecutor's office can repeatedly approach the media and make statements like: 'We are firmly convinced that Christian B is the right person and the perpetrator and killed this girl', but then at the same time we are told that they don't have the crucial evidence.
“This is for me a contradiction in itself."
What could mean, he seems to turn away from former claims, that there will never be a charge against his client. Hard to think he visited portugal just to check the location and doing "bit of own investigation".
His client spoke about something to him. I'm pretty sure of that.
I never heard UK police dismiss Tannerman as a POI and the image still appears on the Find Madeleine website to this day.
DCI Redwood on Crimewatch 2013
"We’re almost certain, now, that this sighting is not the abductor. But very importantly, what it says is that from 9.15, we are able to allow the clock
to move forward and in doing so, things that have not been quite as significant or received quite the same degree of attention are now the centre of our focus."
Abductor = CB
Accomplice = Tannerman.
MOO for a very long time.
There is a legal difference between an abductor & an accomplice.