- Joined
- Jun 30, 2020
- Messages
- 2,413
- Reaction score
- 11,396
These pictures are in the English translations, listed as 'Blood spatter'. With, it says, every sample being to a lab in Birmingham UK. The page says the PJ were under instruction of how to retrieve the samples.. taking 2 from each spot, 1 dry swab and 1 wet swab. I'm sure that is in lining with the type of testing in Birmingham as opposed to the PJ not knowing what to do. Also,this was all done 3 months after May3. It's an awful long time imo X
Yes, but 5A was not occupated after MM's disappearance, right?
By looking at the known circumstances, i still think that a death could have taken place in 5A, of course without any participation of the parents. Why?
The case is kept as a murder, not an abduction. You can't "abduct" a body in the way, abduction of a child is meant. But you can "get rid" of evidence, by removing the forensic evidence, as the body is one.
Even if not confirmed as evidence, there are clues of something, that makes GA and others assume a death has happened in 5A.
It could be easier to leave the area with a dead child, maybe in a bag, as if the child is alive.
And all that could be possible, if the tapas timeline doesn't fit at all, although all of them keep their story, maybe because of self protection. That doesn't make them to criminals of the possible murder. But should they say, that at the evening of may the 3rd, the kids had been unattended for about 2 or even 3 hours?
Maybe no burglary gone wrong, or abduction gone wrong, but planned abuse "gone wrong" and the perp had enough time to tidy up the scenery and remove the evidence?