Ok, let's see :
Well, your post seems a little bit like having some problems with the suspect itself.
Could you please give it some more substance?
I would like to understand your opinion.
I don't have any PARTICULAR problem with this suspect by itself (over any other suspect on the MM case) AS LONG AS he didn't went to Wilhelmshof on 02/05/2015 (as i'm already almost 100% sure he didn't but i'm still lacking some confirmation). Even if he turns out to be a child-killer (or an "adult" killer for that matter) at the end of the day for me he (CB) will still be "just like another" HORRIBLE child-killer but yet we will still be just like the many, many ones that we read on newspapers and we see on TV every now and then. Nothing will justify his acts and nothing will change about the fact that he will still be a "monster" but it will not affect me in any particular way, or in other words, it will not affect me neither more neither less than the "others" that do kill other (random) children.
(...)The problem with most of your argument is you seem to have already decided what sequence of events must have taken place that night by interpreting your likeliest secnario of what "CB would have done to MM". Then you appear to try and discredit that singular theory and claim it as some sort of proof of that CB is therefore not responsible. You fail to account for any other scenarios where CB could be guilty of this girl's muder. Scenarios which might not be quite as horrific or structured as the one you seem to have in your mind.
You are 100 % correct on there. I was not thinking properly. As I stated several days ago I didn't follow the MM case properly. My logic was not rational. I was thinking that IF CB were the one who killed MM then CB could have killed many other children but the other way is also valid, JUST BECAUSE CB might not have killed MM it doesn't mean CB didn't killed other children instead, so i did take a "proper" look over all the other cases that he might be related and I did change my mind a little bit over CB. I now think that HE MIGHT be the one that killed MM but I STILL THINK that BKA will not have enough evidence to charge him and this is now worse because most likely they will know who did the crime and they will be unable to make him pay for it.
I will make another post stating why CB might be the one who killed/took MM after finishing this post.
Again i was driven by my feelings and wishes. I would wish for him to be "clean" from any child murderer but rationaly and thinking properly I can't clear him out on the MM case. As a matter of fact I use a "meter" for each suspect on cases that i'm working on. I can classify a suspect as "impossible" as "possible but very unlikely" as "possible but unlikely" or as "possible and likely" / "possible and very likely". I would place CB in the category of "possible and likely" for MM case NOW. YET I still think that what the BKA have is only STATMENTS of old CB "friends".
What if BKA had BKA dogs inspect every item found at all the CB locations they have searched?
No ... What they would need to do is to check for DNA traces on those objects and NOT inspect with dogs. Using DOGS wouldn't mean anything as if there were some sort of "traces" that would make the dogs bark those traces would be organic and would have left DNA traces that could be linked (or not) to MM.
Agreed. That is a good summary '79. An example: at Praia de Vales it was burglary, no assault at all. And ex-friends describe him as a frequent burglar. It is possible there was no sexual assault in the MM case,
I now think there was. IF CB was the one killing MM he might have entered the house to rob, find out about MM and then return the other day to get MM.
And so going down the route of no sexual assault, could it be then to sell on, whether for a childless couple etc, as he seemed to of gained lots of money, as mentioned by Mt when he turned up to see him in May? As previously mentioned he is guilty of lots of crimes, but not murder, that we are aware of anyway.
Off subject slightly, regarding say a crime is committed, and someone hears someone saying oh I know who did it, and says the name, and you hear them, so you then go the police about it, does the police have to then go and speak to them, or not?? I thought they had to follow up leads, ASAP, and then you get a statement of them, obviously you don't just then charge them, unless they confess
If he did sell MM to other pedoiphiles it would be way worse than killing her on the day he took her. At any rate It's a possibility as aparently he did "run away" from PDL and sell his Jaguar car as soon as MM went missing.
Much wishful thinking here.
Doesn't change the fact that if CB didn't do whatever to MM, then someone else did. The outcome would still remain the same.
To wish and desire that CB is innocent doesn't change much.
MM disappeared from her bed. A beautiful little girl. Someone took her.
If that someone is CB, a thorough investigation is in order and certain things must be ruled out and/or substantiated.
If that someone is not CB, a thorough investigation is still in order and certain things must still be ruled out and/or substantiated.
100 % CORRECT and I do agree with you in all of this. IF it was not CB who killed MM someone else did and if CB did sell MM to someone else most likely she was then abuse by many pedos so it would be way worse.
Goes without saying that EVEN IF CB is innocent on MM case he might not be on other cases and even if he is innocent on other cases he might not be on MM case. MY PERSONAL "WISHING" for CB to be "innocent" is stupid and not valid. Each case have to be judge by itself. Again WISHING for CB to be "innocent" on MM case just for him to be "innocent" as well on other cases is childish, stupid and not realistic. Facing the reality and properly investigating what did happen is the way to go. So yes, BY ALL MEANS,
"If that someone is CB, a thorough investigation is in order and certain things must be ruled out and/or substantiated.
If that someone is not CB, a thorough investigation is still in order and certain things must still be ruled out and/or substantiated."
Is there any possibility CB might ever have made sound recordings?
I don't think so and I don't think it would be relevant as well.
At any rate I DID SPENT THE LAST 2 DAYS investigating and reading not only other crimes but also considering other things. I'M WAY MORE "COMFORTABLE" about CB now but the more I read and the more I study the more I think as well that he might indeed be involved on MM case.
Next post is what I think about CB link to MM case.