And Sta Stendal do know very well exactly where CB was on 02/05/2015 at 19:00-20:00 and he was NOT at wilhelmshof.
How do you know this? Can you post a link?
All the rest that you will read from JC or even HCW regarding this would just be an attempt to put more blames on CB for stuff that they know for sure he haven't done
How do you know what "they know" for sure he hasn't done?
If the words on the book are indeed what HCW stated to JC then there is no doubt (for me) that they are simply trying all that they can to make CB look like a serial-killer
but all this "mess" of linking to stuff where they clearly know "it wasn't him" will not help BKA/HCW at the long run because they will be "seen" as liers
I'm probably going to regret asking this, but are you able to explain, without rambling, EXACTLY what it is you claim HCW/BKA to be lying about? No paragraphs, just straight to the point. "HCW" said.... and then post the quote that you're claiming is a "lie".
If this whole hissy fit and campaign to discredit JC is all because of the mention of IG in his book, you shoud confine your greivance about that to the IG thread. German authorities HAVE looked into CB over IG though, that's a fact. So it's not exactly irrelevant for JC to talk about it even if YOU consider the potential link to be overstated. Back in February there was a story in the Sun with quotes from the German prosecutors office saying they consider that IG/CB investigation "currently" closed as they'd found no evidence so far to indicate his involvement. But equally, there were no quotes stating he has been fully ruled out either, despite what the headline might have said. The fact they used the word "currently" suggests to me that they haven't fully ruled him out, and we wouldn't necessarily know if the investigators in Stendal are still considering the link. So how do you "know for a fact" that CB had nothing to do with it, please post a link?
Anyway, from what I can see, all HCW said about it to JC was that there was some involvement (by his office in the IG case) but that the case was in the hands of the Stendal police i.e. it's not for him to comment on. The CT case is nothing to do with HCW either, it's the Belgian authorities who were investigating a possible link to CB. We don't know what their thoughts are currently on his possible involvement. Again, HCW told JC pretty much the same thing.
Yes, HCW's office are investigating CB directly for those 4 cases you mentioned. But the other 2 cases mentioned are being investigated by other teams, and none of us really KNOW whether CB is (officially or unofficially) still under consideration for either them. Whether you think it's "right" for JC to bring those cases up is a matter of opinion, but the facts are that CB has been looked into a suspect by LE for both of them at some point. Therefore I don't personally think it's unreasonable to discuss those cases in his book given it's been widely covered in the media already, especially when there is still nothing concrete to say CB definitely "couldn't" have been involved in them. If you "know" different, again, post a link!
I hadn't intended to read JC's book, mainly because I'd been told most of it is stuff we've already covered here. But after all the promotion you've given it, I have actually now bought it, so JC can thank you directly for those 8 bucks. I got it mainly to read the chapter where he interviews HCW to see what HCW ACTUALLY said to him. From what I've read so far, none if it is anywhere near as controversial as what you've made it out to be.
If there is something else you think HCW or JC has said that is a "lie", something that actually relates to MM, the missing child who this thread is supposed to be about, then please spit it out.
