So what do you suggest for us to do ? Try to stop to discuss what we think ?
The problem is you just keep repeating what you think over and over and over. We all already know what you think so why do you just keep flooding the thread with massive rambling posts that just repeat the same thing? You say your opinion and that you won't comment anymore and then 5 minutes later you're back making the exact same points. Then you wonder why people think you're trolling.
Your argument effectively boils down to:
HCW says he has evidence that CB killed MM, but HCW still hasn't charged CB or told us the evidence, therefore HCW is a liar and CB is actually innocent!
You don't offer any theory as to why BKA would go making these claims if they have no real evidence though. And as for profiling CB, the points you come up with are so one-eyed and frivolous, they just make no sense. Like the thing with the playground. You think CB was just having some kind of a laugh with his mate and that it's therefore some kind of proof that he wouldn't do anything really bad to a kid. And now with the rape tape, you believe it is all made up and that it is too risky and far fetched for CB to have done such a thing.
Even if BKA doesn't actually get enough evidence to prove beyond doubt that CB is guilty, that doesn’t automatically mean that CB didn't do it. With all the time that has gone by, and the inadequate handling of the initial investigation, getting any really strong and totally conclusive evidence to prove CB (or anyone else for that matter) is responsible for MM's disappearance is obviously going to be very difficult. The chance of getting any sort of forensics now is almost nil unless they find the body. No CCTV. No direct eyewitnesses. So lack of evidence does not necessarily mean lack of guilt even though you keep making that inference. What we do know is that there is apparently a confession, so before you get too excited about CB getting off (which it is very obvious that you want to happen), that alone needs some explanation first. What else BKA might have on him we can only guess at but you can't just assert they don't really have anything on the basis they haven't told you about it.
If you want my personal opinion regarding HCW/BKAs "tactics"... I think when they did the appeal, they probably already had enough evidence to conclude that CB was responsible but not enough that they could confidently guarantee a conviction. A good defence lawyer can wriggle out of all sorts and with all the public attention on this particular case, the last thing they'd want is to rush into it and see that happen 'knowing' that he was guilty. And they obviously felt confident enough to name him and put his face out there in the hope that it would trigger further evidence to go to trial with. People who may have seen him in PDL, people he may have made comments to about MM, places he was staying that might hold clues or where MM's body could be. I don't think it's any more complicated or sinister than that.
And in no way is it in BKA's interest to reveal their evidence publicly at this stage so I don't know what it is you find so hard to understand about that. Yes, it's a bit unusual to publicy accuse CB, BKA have even admitted they were taking an unusual approach in this appeal. But in that case you have to ask the question, why have they chosen to do it? And to me, the only logical explanation is they were already secretly confident they were going to charge him, the only real question was how much further evidence they could gather before they pull that trigger. Having exhausted their leads while working privately, their best chance to get more evidence is to do exactly what they have done by throwing it out to the public. If CB wasn't in jail, I think it's possible they might have pulled him in and charged by now but as HCW has said, there is no need to rush the case when he is going nowhere and they could still get more evidence. JMO.
I mean why would his tactic be to get the public to agree that CB is guilty? How/who does that help? The public aren't going to judge his case in court. What is BKA's motivation to even get involved in this case if they weren't absolutely confident he was guilty and they could get a conviction? They stand to get absolutely trashed if this all falls apart so what is their motive when they could just hand the evidence over to SY or PJ?
You're entitled to your opinion and to believe what you like, but at least make an effort to justify your theories with some proper logic and reasoning rather than just accusing everything of being lies.
