complexes in germany over the last years.
Unbelievable !!Well, if JC is to be believed…
including boys. That's a new clue that indicates, CB didn't care about the gender. Do you really think, he could be just keen about taking a look beneath underage female teen skirts?So what does that add to the MM case?Please excuse, but that's totally wrong!
You ignore the fact, that CB seemed to have collected child
Not really except one thing i already mentioned.
CB seemed to have kept childporn including boys. Just to say thank you Suoerdad. You are often the voice of reason on here along with a couple of others, honourable mention to C Greek. Seriously hope this case can move on to conviction this year, but in the meantime, if not, thanks to all on here that post to help us try and fathom out what the f. happened to this 4 year old child.
Why?
It fits the "keen on abusing the weak" theory. It has been disussed more than once about perps, if they could be responsible. Phrases like "unlikely, because he was keen on boys or girls" and so on. Like the discussions about Martin N. in the past.
So this was new to me and supports my impression of CB. It's not about small fair haired girls IMO.
It's about torturing the weak, maybe with a kind of interest in fair haired victims. No matter if 7 weeks, months, years or even decades of age or even the gender.
It's not a sexual issue, it's about torturing, maybe sadism, that doesn't depend on the gender itself.
I read a lot about that issue, according to that huge amount of disgusting dark web based child
In the end, i'm convinced that there was a kind of web-based society, beginning from the 90's and a developing virtual world, working together to exploit the weak, without taking care about any gender.
90% of all child molesters aren't even peadophile to the bone, it's just about living out the power to the weak. I'm convinced that that is the reason, MN has been sentenced to have killed "just" three boys!
Sadism is about hurting beings, not special genders or races IMO.
You got it all wrong! I am not doubting that these small details paint his picture and expose him for what he is! I am just trying to understand why the rush to broadcast this documentary, when one does not get a sense of what clues the BKA could have especially for the MM case. I am not doubting they have!
Possibly because they have knowledge of what is going to be broadcast in the Monday documentary (and maybe the MWT one?) and know this one would be a little underwhelming in comparison if broadcast afterwards. Or maybe they suspect things might start moving quickly in terms of charges in the near future....
Aren't there any leaks from BKA to some reporters? That could give just a little bit more info on where the reporters could search and look at, giving them some kind of direction?
Nothing personal nor professional here in this case
Yes it was pretty last minute decision to broadcast it. From what @SuperdadV8 reported it appears to me they had quite a lot of the info already in the previous doku but included them only now?
Really?? That is v interesting... i have quite a few journalists and reporters in my entourage, and they always have had their anonymous sources who were close to whatever they reported on!
Hi Superdad, I’ve watched through what I could source online. Just wondering if you’ve heard HCW repeat what he said in the mirror ‘it Is now possible we could charge, we Have that evidence now’ on any German interviews? Thank you
