Madeleine McCann: German prisoner identified as suspect #28

[SuperdadV8]

Just for these? No other defamation?
Might just be one way of forcing HCW's hand on the mention of the 1/2 fingerprint on the knife?

JMO

That won't work and FF knows that!

CB thinks, that he is so much smarter than his solicitor, and told him to react.

And CB is so wrong....!!!

Would pay money for being able to know, how annoyed FF is right now!

 

[Dlk79]

The "other strong arm of the law" reacting, because somebody might have said the most infamous suspect in one of the most famous missing person cases could be responsible for a deceased dog!

Please don't get me wrong! I love animals from the deepest dephts of my heart. Often much more than humans.

But this is getting so ridiculous....

ETA: Laurel & Hardy 2.0....

Great!

It is certainty interesting. In all of the lettters he wrote to Jutta, he apparently makes no direct denial of being involved in MM. Nor does he appear to show any outrage that he is being accused of doing something so heinous. Instead he claims it would have been "absurd" for him to do it only because it would have jeopardised his drug dealing business. Yet the accusation of him neglecting his dogs seems a step too far...

Also interested about the bit regarding the fingerprint and DNA. Not quite sure how to read it but FF saying it is "innacurate" is a very different thing to saying it is "untrue". Is what FF getting at here is that Jutta claimed in the doc that there were fingerprint/DNA in BOTH the HB and beach assault case? When in fact all they have is the partial fingerprint in the HB case perhaps? I don't recall what Jutta said exactly about it on the doc.

 

[tedtink]

From all accounts CB did love those dogs and we have seen many articles related to his 'beloved dog Charlie'.
Maybe this accusation has 'triggered' him. A vulnerability in CB perhaps?
I seem to remember commenting the 1st or 2nd thread that one way to get a psychological hook during possible interrogation of CB, may be through exploiting his closeness to 'Charlie'.
I could be totally wrong though!
JMO

 

[SuperdadV8]

It is certainty interesting. In all of the lettters he wrote to Jutta, he apparently makes no direct denial of being involved in MM. Nor does he appear to show any outrage that he is being accused of doing something so heinous. Instead he claims it would have been "absurd" for him to do it only because it would have jeopardised his drug dealing business. Yet the accusation of him neglecting his dogs seems a step too far...

Also interested about the bit regarding the fingerprint and DNA. Not quite sure how to read it but FF saying it is "innacurate" is a very different thing to saying it is "untrue". Is what FF getting at here is that Jutta claimed in the doc that there were fingerprint/DNA in BOTH the HB and beach assault case? When in fact all they have is the partial fingerprint in the HB case perhaps? I don't recall what Jutta said exactly about it on the doc.

She said fingerprints or (!) DNA in the HB case. Not more, not less.

But it's not about that. It's about a CB acting like "Pippi Longstocking", if you know what i mean!

My world, my rules, my reality! So funny!

 

[SuperdadV8]

From all accounts CB did love those dogs and we have seen many articles related to his 'beloved dog Charlie'.
Maybe this accusation has 'triggered' him. A vulnerability in CB perhaps?
I seem to remember commenting the 1st or 2nd thread that one way to get a psychological hook into CB may be through 'Charlie'.
JMO

His dogs never rejected his orders. So he loved them. Law abiding subdits.

That's all!

ETA: Like he had to be in his youth maybe...

 

[tedtink]

His dogs never rejected his orders. So he loved them. Law abiding subdits.

That's all!

ETA: Like he had to be in his youth maybe...

Some people have an affinity with dogs for different reasons, some as they don't or can't have 'normal' relationships with people. Dogs offer unconditional love, no matter how they are treated, that's the difference. It's about the love received from the dog.

 

[SuperdadV8]

Some people have an affinity with dogs for different reason, some as they don't or can't have 'normal' relationships with people. Dogs offer unconditional love, no matter how they are treated, that's the difference. It's about the love received from the dog.

Of course! Maybe the only kind of real love he ever recieved, no matter how he treated them dogs....

 

[tedtink]

Would pay money for being able to know, how annoyed FF is right now!

Why would FF be annoyed?
He might be able to do some paid work for CB at last!

 

[tedtink]

It is certainty interesting. In all of the lettters he wrote to Jutta, he apparently makes no direct denial of being involved in MM. Nor does he appear to show any outrage that he is being accused of doing something so heinous. Instead he claims it would have been "absurd" for him to do it only because it would have jeopardised his drug dealing business. Yet the accusation of him neglecting his dogs seems a step too far...

Also interested about the bit regarding the fingerprint and DNA. Not quite sure how to read it but FF saying it is "innacurate" is a very different thing to saying it is "untrue". Is what FF getting at here is that Jutta claimed in the doc that there were fingerprint/DNA in BOTH the HB and beach assault case? When in fact all they have is the partial fingerprint in the HB case perhaps? I don't recall what Jutta said exactly about it on the doc.

How would FF even know if it's untrue or inaccurate?
Has BKA shared evidence with FF on HB rape or beach assault?
I think it was JC who first reported that Police had found a partial fingerprint - But who gave that info to JR?

EXPLAINED: The new clues that link German sex offender to missing Madeleine McCann - Olive Press News Spain

 

[Dlk79]

How would FF even know if it's untrue or inaccurate?
Has BKA shared evidence with FF on HB rape or beach assault?

Don't know, seems unlikely they would tell him what evidence they have but in the article it says the following -

According to an e-mail from the public prosecutor's office, from which Fülscher quotes, these details are "inaccurate"

So presumably FF enquired about something regarding the case with the BKA (or has been told something by them previously) that he feels contadicts whatever was claimed in the doc...?

It's all getting very bizarre.

 

[C.greek]

She said fingerprints or (!) DNA in the HB case. Not more, not less.

But it's not about that. It's about a CB acting like "Pippi Longstocking", if you know what i mean!

My world, my rules, my reality! So funny!

So you think FF is acting under CB'S request?

Interestingly, JR appears to include a caveat into whether this actually happened (starving his dogs). It's not like she is presenting is as fact. I really do wonder what this is all about...
Didn't CB supposedly give his okay for the doc? This was my understanding from the documentary. Or at least for his letters to be read in public? Is there mention of that in the doc or am I making it up?!

And indeed it appears that Dna and/or fingerprints were not found in both cases! So indeed it is inaccurate! What is FF driving at?

 

[C.greek]

How would FF even know if it's untrue or inaccurate?
Has BKA shared evidence with FF on HB rape or beach assault?
I think it was JC who first reported that Police had found a partial fingerprint - But who gave that info to JR?

EXPLAINED: The new clues that link German sex offender to missing Madeleine McCann - Olive Press News Spain

Presumably JC gave that information to JR. JC played a big part in the documentary

 

[SuperdadV8]

So you think FF is acting under CB'S request?

Interestingly, JR appears to include a caveat into whether this actually happened (starving his dogs). It's not like she is presenting is as fact. I really do wonder what this is all about...
Didn't CB supposedly give his okay for the doc? This was my understanding from the documentary. Or at least for his letters to be read in public? Is there mention of that in the doc or am I making it up?!

And indeed it appears that Dna and/or fingerprints were not found in both cases! So indeed it is inaccurate! What is FF driving at?

FF isn't driving to nowhere anymore, because he seem to have taken over the case with a different expectation.

As long as HIS client is serving the audience, his job has been limited on simple reactions.

JMO....

 

[mrjitty]

Don't know, seems unlikely they would tell him what evidence they have but in the article it says the following -

According to an e-mail from the public prosecutor's office, from which Fülscher quotes, these details are "inaccurate"

So presumably FF enquired about something regarding the case with the BKA (or has been told something by them previously) that he feels contadicts whatever was claimed in the doc...?

It's all getting very bizarre.

In general terms, where JR is saying there exists forensic evidence that CB raped HB, but is unable to substantiate it, that could be problematic for her.

I don't think HCW or BKA have ever officially said this? (I presume someone has said it off the record)

 

[SuperdadV8]

Why would FF be annoyed?
He might be able to do some paid work for CB at last!

No, no....,no.....

Too many lawyers in germany, all paid for their work. It doesn't matter if they win or lose the case. Even if the suspect is poor, the state will pay the lawyer.

But taking over the possibility to get attention and the possibility of a wiki-article is priceless, don't you think? After that you do not need mandates anymore, because you decide what job to take. And you will get paid by the hours you breathe about the case.

It's like it is in every country in this world!

 

[C.greek]

The reply from SAT.1 to DWDL.de "Weder Sat.1 noch Jutta Rabe liegt eine Strafanzeige vor."

Neither JR nor SAT.1 have (received?) a criminal complaint.
Please @SuperdadV8 @Hygge is this translation accurate?

Fall Maddie McCann: Verdächtiger zeigt Journalistin an - DWDL.de

 

[SuperdadV8]

The reply from SAT.1 to DWDL.de "Weder Sat.1 noch Jutta Rabe liegt eine Strafanzeige vor."

Neither JR nor SAT.1 have (received?) a criminal complaint.
Please @SuperdadV8 @Hygge is this translation accurate?

Fall Maddie McCann: Verdächtiger zeigt Journalistin an - DWDL.de

You made a comprehensable translation, but it is very possible, that authorities in germany aren't working that fast, to react about this nonsense that quick.

You wouldn't believe, but in the regular hours of the day, german police is busy with protecting normal people from strange people!

 

[C.greek]

You made a comprehensable translation, but it is very possible, that authorities in germany aren't working that fast, to react about this nonsense that quick.

You wouldn't believe, but in the regular hours of the day, german police is busy with protecting normal people from strange people!

So such a complaint wouldn't be sent to the accused party the same day? In Greece it is notified on the same day that it is filed and it's not always through the police but also a legal representative (depending on what type of complaint it is)

ETA why do you think it is nonsense? Is it just a face saving attempt (a bit too late though!)? Why hasn't FF filed a complaint against the prosecutor?

 

[tedtink]

The OP article that mentioned the 'partial finger print' was published on 20 Jan.
Perhaps FF emailed BKA after he'd read the article and asked them to clarify the partial fingerprint claim?
BKA may have said the information was 'inaccurate'.
FF waited for the docu to be aired before apparently making the complaint against JR.
Who knows where the DNA claim came from though.

Semantics at play here whatever is going on I think.

JMO

 

[SuperdadV8]

So such a complaint wouldn't be sent to the accused party the same day? In Greece it is notified on the same day that it is filed and it's not always through the police but also a legal representative (depending on what type of complaint it is)

ETA why do you think it is nonsense? Is it just a face saving attempt (a bit too late though!)? Why hasn't FF filed a complaint against the prosecutor?