Madeleine McCann: German prisoner identified as suspect #29

[onemoremiletogo]

Nothing really new. Only old media regurgitation.
It seems that, after the desperate appeal in June 2020(!), what they want (tip/final proof) doesn't even arrive or had already been / was meanwhile eliminated. If something incriminating remained till 2013, police forces were "so kind" in approaching CB in a very open way and write to him to tell him what it was about...

 

[SuperdadV8]

Interesting, to see the the opinions split into two camps in here.

It resembles the state of the investigations IMO. Strong verdict vs. a possible lack of hard evidence.

Some have to be more patient, some have to cry out loud. Like in so many cases, that do not have this kind of media coverage.

So blame it on the tabloids, not the prosecutors.

PS: The tabloids brought up CB's name and picture first, not the prosecutors office.

 

[Anxala]

From the Mirror link above:

"My inquiries have unearthed evidence which is pretty explosive, but I’m not saying whether I believe what he told me. That’s for viewers to judge."

Well, either it's explosive or it's not. If it's explosive (in the context MWT is using the term), the implication is that the evidence he's unearthed turns this guilty charge completely on its head. It clearly does not since he adds the 'rider' that it, paraphrasing, might also be a load of old unsubstantiated cobblers that will barely cause a small breeze, let along the seismic shift in opinion his 'explosive' promised.

 

[mrjitty]

The patsy conspiracy is absurd

 

[SuperdadV8]

The patsy conspiracy is absurd

This is what CB is trying to indicate right now, whilst enjoying the alleged "most wanted" status and trying to mock his former victims by describing child abuse with "there has been something with kids".

Just narcassism at it's best! C'mon, didn't we all make mistakes in our youth....?

 

[tedtink]

This is what CB is trying to indicate right now, whilst enjoying the alleged "most wanted" status and trying to mock his former victims by describing child abuse with "there has been something with kids".

Just narcassism at it's best! C'mon, didn't we all make mistakes in our youth....?

Aah CB's probably a glib, charmer - his pen-pal is possibly some kind of gormless, easily manipulated eejit.
Mind you, must be pocketing a little wonga selling his letters to the media too - Classy

MOO

 

[SuperdadV8]

This is what CB is trying to indicate right now, whilst enjoying the alleged "most wanted" status and trying to mock his former victims by describing child abuse with "there has been something with kids".

Just narcassism at it's best! C'mon, didn't we all make mistakes in our youth....?

Additionally, i do not think that this kind of behavior is that unusal if someone is coming from where CB came.

I'm not happy with some already known circumstances of his youth. Obviously we are talking about a rejected soul. His own mother left him to authorities, foster parents who have beaten the s@*t out of him, no love at all!

Dangerous assets IMO. Of course, no apology for all the crimes, he commited in the past, but a already known base for a kind of "special" behavior in his life.

Some of us who didn't experience this kind of youth react different under the influence of alcohol or drugs. Just imagine what happens to a guy like CB.

I'm convinced, that his strategy of keeping up conversations with the media whilst keeping quiet to the prosecutors won't work forever. Some day he will start to make mistakes.

But i understand it in some way. Seems like he had to care about his issues by himself for his whole life. So maybe he doesn't even trust his solicitor. Hard to think, that FF is happy, seeing his client talk to everyone in the media.

But....nothing of my business! Good strategy, to wait for some time IMO.

 

[mrjitty]

He seems to have written letters to rando true crime grifters

 

[mrjitty]

Additionally, i do not think that this kind of behavior is that unusal if someone is coming from where CB came.

Agreed. He's a small time loser and crook from a predictable background.

 

[SuperdadV8]

Agreed. He's a small time loser and crook from a predictable background.

Yes jitty, crook fits it on a "first" impression. No doubt!

Otherwise nope jitty, i do not agree with the "small time" argument. We are discussing a highly dangerous profile IMO. No joke!

Two faced lad, that's for sure!

 

[tedtink]

What happens next to Maddie suspect Christian Brueckner?

Shame Amaral's 'scapegoat' claim was mentioned in the article, but hey, merde happens.

 

[Hygge]

Are any of these latter claims ( highlighted) anything than tabloid sensationalism ?
Has he been charged or convicted for such crimes ? I'm sure you can provide evidence for this, particularly the etc bits

What evidence do you need? Here are the official court files of the rape of DM with links
Der Bundesgerichtshof - Presse : Pressemitteilungen aus dem Jahr 2020 - Urteil des Landgerichts Braunschweig wegen schwerer Vergewaltigung einer 72-Jährigen in Portugal rechtskräftig

 

[tedtink]

Even CB's dogs' heads weren't buried in the sand ................allegedly.

 

[Lilly b]

He seems to have written letters to rando true crime grifters

Was he not writing to that rabbe person too ,?

 

[SuperdadV8]

Even CB's dogs' heads weren't buried in the sand ................allegedly.

Sadist, necrophile or both? What do you think, about the one who is public citizen #1 since his 18th year of age?

 

[tedtink]

Are any of these latter claims ( highlighted) anything than tabloid sensationalism ?
Has he been charged or convicted for such crimes ? I'm sure you can provide evidence for this, particularly the etc bits

Well, apart from the numerous listed convictions above, here's a little sentence straight from the man of the moment himself.......
Notice how he minimises the child sex abuse - sound familiar? JMO

'Drug dealer, breaking into houses, living in cars and there was something with kids when I was 17.

Maddie suspect Christian Brueckner describes himself as the 'most known bad person in the world' | Daily Mail Online

 

[frank-cole]

From the Mirror link above:


Well, either it's explosive or it's not. If it's explosive (in the context MWT is using the term), the implication is that the evidence he's unearthed turns this guilty charge completely on its head. It clearly does not since he adds the 'rider' that it, paraphrasing, might also be a load of old unsubstantiated cobblers that will barely cause a small breeze, let along the seismic shift in opinion his 'explosive' promised.

I messaged MWT on Twitter & asked him if he’d shared what he ‘uncovered’. He replied saying he always shares what he finds with detectives & then he waffled a bit about the prosecution having a different agenda.

Knowing that he’s shared this so called ‘alibi’ with the authorities & their investigations have not changed, is IMO a clear sign that they aren’t credible. All they seem to be are buzzwords that promote the documentary

 

[peanutJelly]

Even CB's dogs' heads weren't buried in the sand ................allegedly.

Even his cars weren’t safe…

 

[C.greek]

I messaged MWT on Twitter & asked him if he’d shared what he ‘uncovered’. He replied saying he always shares what he finds with detectives & then he waffled a bit about the prosecution having a different agenda.

Knowing that he’s shared this so called ‘alibi’ with the authorities & their investigations have not changed, is IMO a clear sign that they aren’t credible. All they seem to be are buzzwords that promote the documentary

Of course - how else would he promote his docu? Explosive but not so explosive that the prosecution takes it on board - means they have a different agenda... what agenda does MWT really have then I wonder? An audience for his docu ready to maintain the guilt of others rather than CB... what is the reason for re-editing as it appears the 3rd part? It was the alibi in that one...

 

[mrjitty]

Interesting, to see the the opinions split into two camps in here.

Just to be clear here - I think there is a 3rd camp which is my camp

HCW's public appeal was made with judicial oversight from a German Court. So it is clear he has some strong evidence, but we can say it was evidence less than charging level.

Nearly 2 years later, I find it difficult to believe that any prosecutor would move ahead on lesser investigations/charges, in preference to his murder case, if he had a case strong enough to go to trial.

I also don't really understand how waiting maybe another year or more to bring charges will be making the case stronger, unless somehow there is a massive amount of technical evidence to process. Which seems highly unlikely for an abduction case back in 07 when HCW says there is no new forensics.

So my camp is this case remains too weak to go to trial. My guess (only) is that they really want the body. The usual reason to wait in a no body case is to find the body. Seems obvious, and without need to conjure up complicated reasons.