There appears to be a high level of Naivety regarding this investigation.
How can someone be declared as a POI for 2 Years with no action taken against them.
Unless something is discovered to exhonerate the suspect, they could theoretically remain a person of interest indefinitely. My take on it is the BKA had strong grounds to suspect him of the crime when the appeal was made two years ago, and everything else they've found in the intervening period, has only strengthened that belief. They've found nothing to dispute it. On the other hand, they still haven't found the 'smoking-gun' to assure a conviction. But according to HCW, they do have enough to charge, but since they are under no time pressure they will continue and hopefully gather even further evidence to strengthen their case.
I know a lot of people have a gripe with the length of time, but when you analyse HCW's rationale, it does make absolute sense. CB is going nowhere, why rush into a charge when you don't need to yet?
This person named by press and authorities cannot possibly have a fair trial in any country as it would be difficult to find a jury that were not aware of him.
If he is charged, it will almost certainly be made in Germany. In a German murder trial, there is no jury. The case is evaluated by professional Judges who aren't going to be swayed by tabloid stories.
Would police not seek authority by placing evidence in front of the equiv. of CPS to get a decision before leaking the POI to media?
The German equivalent of the CPS are the Public Prosecutors. That is who HCW works for and they are the ones who made the appeal and who have been communicating with the press. In order to make the public appeal, the Prosecutors have to go before a judge and explain their rationale behind it. The Judge then determines based on the credibility of the existing evidence if a public appeal is justified. In this case, they obviously thought it was.
IMO As Portuguese law is now close to being able to try an Arguido, They just want to put anyone in the dock and even of the case fails the authorities and media can say:
"We had a suspect but no proof-Case closed"
I think that is naive. Personally I think the Arguido move is just to keep all options open. And to provide justification for the Portuguese to continue working on the case, alongside the Germans, once the SOL has expired.
One question-Who would be called to provide evidence at such atrial and would the questions perhaps provide more answers?
Well for starters there will be the person who claims CB told him that that he snatched MM. A lot of people seem to want to conveniently gloss over that bit. This person is being written off as an unreliable witness, yet people don't yet even know what he has to say or what the BKA have been able to independently corroborate. The police don't see him as unreliable and he was used as a key witness in the rape trial against CB and was believed by the Judge there too.
I have never seen a case before where all of the tabloids are so united around what they publish or are allowed to publish.
I don't think it has been united. The tabs flip flop between him being bang to rights one minute and totally innocent the next. The only constant is the churning of stories, any story, that gets them 'clicks'. The truth of the matter is the MM saga is a peculiarity in its own right. It's probably the biggest missing person mystery of all time and the coverage of it has been ever-present in the media for the last 15 years. The barrage of stories over the last 2 years shouldn't really come as a surprise to anyone given the circumstances. Like it or not, the incessant media coverage is driven by the public's interest in the case.