The latest update yields more questions than answers. With ‘fibre traces’ I’m pretty sure they would be forensic evidence & HCW has denied they have forensic evidence. (Any thoughts?)
SF is absolute, she seems so sure. I do think she & others have been privy to some information, IMO something has definitely changed because the McCann’s, the PJ & the BKA all now appear convinced that this horrific crime occurred.
As for NF. She clearly has a very questionable past. That said, the BKA are incredibly detailed & relentless. So IMO, if she was the caller or had some knowledge of the crime, they’d probably have found clues to suggest that.