That might depend on who was involved.
Going by my own children at that age probably well over a hundred if both parents have a camera or camera on their phone. Just the one video has ever been published and that was at the airport. With the T7 I would expect numerous other images of MM. It’s utterly bizarre the few photos that have ever been released of that ‘holiday’
Maybe I'm of an earlier, pre-digital era, but I have relatively few photos of my children. In the days of film one was restricted to 36 shots per film and one tended to be selective about what was photographed. Even post-digital I still tend to be selective about what I photograph and don't take many family photos.
Achieved nothing?
I think posts like this are veering off topic. While I agree that there are many oddities and peculiarities with much of the McCann, T7, Murat behaviour and actions pre and post MM’s abduction, they’re not the topic of this forum. Plenty of places online to discuss that stuff.
Which is what exactly could happen to the German suspect.
I don’t think that the 2013 TV appeal was the starting point for the investigation into CB. I am almost certain it was information found at the box factory. Yes CB was on record because of the TV appeal but IMO, it didn’t drive the investigation.
Long before the name of Brueckner was even mentioned in association with Madeleine's abduction, Scotland Yard said one of the possibilities they were investigating was a 'burglary gone wrong'.
Obviously you can believe what you want and if that’s that OG was a success then that’s your choice.
Show's what rubbish that was, how is stealing a child a burglary gone wrong, blooming jackpot for CB (not that it was him imo), not forgetting OG went after the three locals for such , phone data was the none existent key to them, along with CB.
Christian Brueckner entered apartment 5a with intent to burgle, and a long pedigree of such crime, and decided, instead, that he would take Madeleine. All wholly consistent with his established modus operandi.
Who says CB entered 5a, where's the evidence for such a claim ? What Mo, show where he's been convicted of entering apartments with out leaving a trace ?
There are plausible options which we have discussed before. As an example, let’s say MM interrupted the burglar at the same time MO was carrying out his check. The burglar restrains MM, covering her mouth and nose. He inadvertently suffocates her.
The Germans can't place him in Luz, let alone in 5A.
Yes I agree, but there is no evidence of an intruder in 5a, a half decent defence would ask for evidence of such if a prosecution were to go down that path , go back to the PJ files there is no crime scene photos of any break in, that path cannot be used surely . The only way Wolters can circumvent that is to say CB used the patio doors .
I agree, as recently as May on the CH5 piece with MWT, Wolters tells those that will listen he cannot place CB in Luz on the night of 3/05/2007 .
I wouldn't have bothered with the word opportunistic and just settled for abuse gone wrong.
