I've got two video cameras from that era, no SD card function on them .All old tape of our children growing up . We recorded to tape then transferred to vhs, we've recently found a company that uploaded from vhs into a digital format and now are in the clouds, think CB went to that trouble ?
Speculation is the name of the game, even when its of no real importance.
What about it ?
At the same time he admits this.
From the same article:
How can he be confident and in the same article be pessimistic with we have no DNA or photographic evidence linking CB to Madeleine .
Because we don't know what evidence he has. And he is under no obligation to reveal anything publicly.
He is not on a mission to scramble anyone's brain, just get at the truth of what happened to Madeleine.
Nobody asked him to tell the world MM was dead and he knew who did it. His own actions since then have tended to suggest he was exaggerating,
I'm struggling withe s concept of him knowing she was murdered even though he admits he has no idea how she died, or even she is dead.
In your imagination as one who theorises without foundation as to the explanation of Madeleine's disappearance.
www.theolivepress.es
Quite possibly the delay in pressing charges in respect of crimes against Madeleine is not to do with lack of confidence in the case; 'just' the sheer volume and weight of total charges that are pending to be brought against Brueckner, in respect of a multitude of crimes. There's only so much that can be done at once and the German police are working systematically through a massive backlog.
I don't know what happened to MM and have never pretended I do.
www.thesun.co.uk
A written account by CB (the rumoured notebook, or perhaps recently discovered online chat) would allow confidence even in the absence of DNA or photographic evidence.
