Madeleine McCann: German Prisoner Identified as Suspect, #36

[RichardKimble]

“I can’t tell you on which basis we assume she is dead. But for us, there’s no other possibility. There is no hope she is alive.”

Prosecutor '100% convinced' suspect abducted and murdered Madeleine McCann

Madeleine McCann prosecutors say they have no body and no DNA but other evidence leads to only one conclusion - jailed rapist Christian Brueckner is guilty and could be charged next year

www.mirror.co.uk

Madeleine McCann investigators ‘100% convinced’ suspect killed her

Prosecutors said they will hold off until they have more evidence

www.independent.co.uk

He told the Mirror the team were “100 per cent convinced” that the British girl was killed by Brueckner, who is a convicted paedophile.

 

[Lyall0814]

What specifically do you think they lied about in June 2020?

I didn't say they lied about anything.

 

[onemoremiletogo]

Back in June 2020...going in circles here. It seems BKA is really a kamikaze team. LOL

 

[onemoremiletogo]

We assume the girl is dead. There’s no other possibility.
Maybe my confusion but I thought there was something reporting "she's would not have survived"?! But can't catch this in the press.
Photo or autobiographic text or panikspatz chat (corroborating HB and others? testimonies) and that may capture pre-torture or pre-destruction of the body?!

 

[Megnut]

We assume the girl is dead. There’s no other possibility.
Maybe my confusion but I thought there was something reporting "she's would not have survived"?! But can't catch this in the press.
Photo or autobiographic text or panikspatz chat (corroborating HB and others? testimonies) and that may capture pre-torture or pre-destruction of the body?!

I hate myself for thinking this but.... photographic evidence in the fire would do it. Horrific and unsurvivable.

jmo

 

[Mex]

I don't get that impression but that may be just me. I trust they are doing the best they can to bring justice for MM and her family. Jmo

Not forgetting that there are five cases pending which also have victims awaiting justice.

 

[Consider Dudley]

“I can’t tell you on which basis we assume she is dead. But for us, there’s no other possibility. There is no hope she is alive.”

Prosecutor '100% convinced' suspect abducted and murdered Madeleine McCann

Madeleine McCann prosecutors say they have no body and no DNA but other evidence leads to only one conclusion - jailed rapist Christian Brueckner is guilty and could be charged next year

www.mirror.co.uk

Madeleine McCann investigators ‘100% convinced’ suspect killed her

Prosecutors said they will hold off until they have more evidence

www.independent.co.uk

He told the Mirror the team were “100 per cent convinced” that the British girl was killed by Brueckner, who is a convicted paedophile.

Yes, that’s expressing their opinion, not claiming CB’s guilt is an incontrovertible fact.

 

[Consider Dudley]

I didn't say they lied about anything.

So when you said they were bluffing what did you mean exactly? My understanding of the word bluffing is to be deceiving which is akin to telling an untruth which is similar to lying.

 

[Mex]

If we don't find anything we'll let you know, but if we do we wont, is what?

There won't be any wondering or speculation if the dam search reveals nothing.
If something relevant to the inquiry is found that will be added to the evidence chain. And may be used to lay charges at some time in the future when they have collected and collated everything they can until such time as there is no more evidence to be found..

My opinion makes that sound evidence gathering designed not to compromise the investigation.
What opinion have you reached?

 

[Lyall0814]

Yes, that’s expressing their opinion, not claiming CB’s guilt is an incontrovertible fact.

"We have enough evidence to say our suspect killed Madeleine McCann" - Wolters on Aussie Sixty Minutes. June 2020.

 

[Lyall0814]

So when you said they were bluffing what did you mean exactly? My understanding of the word bluffing is to be deceiving which is akin to telling an untruth which is similar to lying.

Bluffing by saying things like he did on the Sixty Minutes show.

 

[Consider Dudley]

"We have enough evidence to say our suspect killed Madeleine McCann" - Wolters on Aussie Sixty Minutes. June 2020.

And?

 

[Consider Dudley]

Bluffing by saying things like he did on the Sixty Minutes show.

Bluffing by saying things like he did on the Sixty Minutes show.

What things specifically do you think he was bluffing about?

 

[Lyall0814]

Bluffing by saying he knows for certain something he can't possibly know for certain.

Let's leave it, Dudley. Just agree to disagree Just saying what I think. It's cool if you don't agree.

 

[Mex]

Just mean imo in Germany investigators brief/feed/leak to media as much as investigators do from time to time everywhere else. Some posters seem to think they don't. Not even when there's a huge media event like we saw in June 2020, which, to many of us, certainly looked to have been coordinated with press and TV.

There has been some rewriting of history to obfuscate the fact that the German case was not broken to msm by anyone from the German investigation. I haven't seen anything which could be termed a "leak" coming from them either, they have been upfront. My opinion

 

[Mex]

Ask the prosecutor, he's the one who repeatedly made the "he's 100% guilty! [re:MM]" statements. Over the years I've always thought anyone who says they're 100% certain about what happened to Madeleine are either 1) twits, or 2) someone with an agenda. Clearly the prosecutors aren't twits, so imo they have an agenda.

If there is an agenda it surely must be getting on with the job of prosecuting miscreants to achieve justice for the victims of crime?

What's wrong with that?

 

[Mex]

An agenda other than the one stated, I should have said. Of course they want to keep him in prison as long as possible, we all understand that. But it might well turn out they hoped the media blitz in June 2020 would either make him confess in some way to some involvement or make him incriminate others re:MM. Imo they bluffed. Many wouldn't blame them but bluffing's no good if the bloke didn't actually do it.

The German investigation did not cause any media blitz. My opinion is that was carried out in a manner that entailed a wrecking ball being aimed directly at their investigation. Forcing them to perform a rear guard defence of their position as a result.

 

[Lyall0814]

There has been some rewriting of history to obfuscate the fact that the German case was not broken to msm by anyone from the German investigation. I haven't seen anything which could be termed a "leak" coming from them either, they have been upfront. My opinion

How did Der Spiegel TV have so much information to broadcast just six days after the prosecutor's office went public?

 

[Lyall0814]

The German investigation did not cause any media blitz. My opinion is that was carried out in a manner that entailed a wrecking ball being aimed directly at their investigation. Forcing them to perform a rear guard defence of their position as a result.

No media blitz? I presume in Germany they were still calling him Christian B (and maybe they still are) and not using his photo but in Britain his photo was on the front page of eight national papers. Eight!

 

[Mex]

How did Der Spiegel TV have so much information to broadcast just six days after the prosecutor's office went public?

Goodness! Did it really take them as long as six days? My opinion is that we live in a digital age of immediate wall to wall dissemination of information. The minute any sort of information is given - it goes round the world in seconds complete with accompanying journalistic copy.

The initial release of information via MS's podcast was in April 2019 don't forget. And therein is where the mischief making lies - not with investigators building an evidence based case against a suspect. My opinion