Please try to follow the argument and not confuse it. If you follow this exchange of posts, you originally stated tat there were “victims of five seperate crimes awaiting justice”.
As two of these victims are unidentified and we have no understanding of whether they even believe a crime has been committed, how can you say they are awaiting justice?
Beyond this, the only evidence there is that any offence occurred in these two cases comes from witness statements of two convicted criminals.
Currently, there are no outstanding charges against CB - they have been thrown out. If the charges go to court then we will see if CB is convicted for these two rape cases. In any event, we can be certain that your original statement that victims in five seperate cases are awaiting justice is incorrect, two of the victims haven’t even asked for justice.
BIB
Actually one, because for instance, only one described the rape of the elderly american, and only one described the 'italian woman'. We know that the elderly american testimony was correct because it is corroborated, but with the 'italian woman' did the guy get mixed up? did he actually see something else? or did he fill in details about what was the same rape because he didn't really remember?
Apparently both describe the teenager - though different sequences
This is why it could get difficult IMO
Last edited: