Sorry, what do you mean by the clothing being weird?Yes the clothing thing was weird I found it odd too but it's possible that they gave him clothing to wear? If not that means you have to consider SY are up to some strange shenanigans with that announcement.
I can't agree with that as a blanket statement, like many things in this case there is conflicting info. The McCanns say they can't remember who called the police. Phone records show a phone call made something like 45 minutes after 10.
This statement caught my eye, one witness saying the men in the group were searching in the bushes before Kate Mccann raised the alarm from the balcony!
'He served Russell and shortly thereafter, he was alerted to strange movements in the restaurant perimeters. He refers to the movements of two men from said group? David Payne and Matthew, who appeared to be searching the gardens the areas near the bar. The witness went to the esplanade zone and saw that the table that had previously been occupied by nine adults was now occupied only by the older woman, called Dianne Webster. It was also at this time that he saw that Russell's food was only half eaten and that the others had all finished their dinner.
David Payne and Matthew were nervously searching the area.
The witness went to them, he does not remember which one, and asked what was happening. One of them responded to the witness in English stating 'A GIRL IS MISSING?' that a child had gone missing. After a few moments, around 5 or 10 minutes, he heard screaming from the apartment zone and saw a woman on the balcony of 5 A. He did not understand what she was saying. As it was night, and given the distance from the Tapas bar to the apartment, he was not able to determine if there was someone else next to the woman on the balcony. At that moment his colleague, Joe, met up with him and asked the witness to call the police,
Yes the clothing thing was weird I found it odd too but it's possible that they gave him clothing to wear? If not that means you have to consider SY are up to some strange shenanigans with that announcement.
I'm getting v confused re the Tanner and Smith sightings, as to which sighting was by whom? I've googled and it still isn't totally clear who saw what.
I've just read this, re Smith seeing GM walking down the plane steps. The description doesn't match the way the man in the sketch was carrying the girl.
Or is the sketch (The one with the beige trousers and brown jacket) from the Tanner sighting??
"The father, Martin Smith, is shocked. He recognises the way the man turns his head down and the way the child is being held against the shoulder."
" One witness who reported seeing a man carrying a young girl with blonde hair on the night of the disappearance. He later told the police the man could have been Madeleine's father.
Martin Smith, 58, on holiday at the time, was interviewed by detectives in Portugal and his native Ireland but the line of inquiry was later discarded.
Four months after his initial statement Mr Smith contacted the police to say he had seen Madeleine's parents arriving back in Britain on BBC News, and the way Mr McCann carried one of the couple's twins reminded him of the man he had seen in Portugal.
When detectives replayed video footage of the couple's arrival at East Midlands airport, the witness said he was 60-80% sure that the man he passed was Gerry McCann.
But this was later dismissed by prosecutors because at the time of the reported sighting, shortly before 2200, Gerry McCann was sitting in the Ocean Club's tapas bar with other members of his party."
BBC NEWS | UK | Police files give McCanns 'hope'
Your welcome. Tannerman sketchThanks, but I meant was the sketch of the man (beige trousers and brown jacket) carrying a child based on the Smith or Tanner sighting?
I looked at the info about this German racist/pedophile, and his group of lowlife friends,
Too much information! I’m forgetting things!Did the suspect enter via the patio door or window? Presumably they left the same way?
I find it hard to believe he wouldn't have headed out of the window when GM came in, at least when he heard him going into toilet. Possibly lowered the blind a bit under the noise of cistern. People who prey on the vulnerable tend not to face up to someone their own size, in my experience. But I could see him waiting to see what happened next and whether it was safe to go back in. Unless of course, he already had the gun and that gave him confidence. I think there would definitely have been room behind the door, so long as he splayed his feet a bit. But my money would be on him coming in/back in after Gerry had left. Then he could have seen him talking outside and gone out whichever entrance was best.I really wish someone ( man size) would have tested that in the apartment. From the photos I think the space up against the wall and jutting out bit of the built-in wardrobe looks tiny to me, there's a scale from forensics on one of the photos too but hard to see. I'm a small woman and I just tried 'hiding' behind my own door and I hardly fit without a wardrobe being there. ( felts slightly ridiculous too!) I suppose he could have hidden behind another door in the apartment but I'm not convinced. People should look up the police drawings / plan. It's a very compact apartment and apparently, GM went in there, visited the toilet, possibly watched football for a bit and then looked in on the children, as he said poking his head, into their room.
Except that I think the creche had "crash mats" where the children went to sleep, so it would make sense to dress them in pjs so they could be just carried to bed undisturbed. But wrapped in a blanket or at least an adult's jacket. That's the puzzling bit for me and the bit that makes me think the Smith sighting could well have been MM.The way the child was positioned is exactly how my child looks when I remove her from my bed back into her own bed. Just slide both arms in, under her back and bottom, and lift. She ends up in an almost sitting position. But this is the best way, as not to disturb her. The creche man doesn't sit right with me because, for 1, if I cared for children at a creche, I would see to it that she was properly dressed for leaving so late, with a coat on and whatnot. Besides, who sends children to creche wearing pyjamas anyway? As a parent, I would have woken my child to put on her jacket, had she not already been wearing it. The Tannerman held the child in a position like she had been lifted, undisturbed from her bed! X
I seem to remember he wore a similar jacket to the one he had that night. People tend to stick with styles of clothing. (and shops!)Sorry, what do you mean by the clothing being weird?
Yes. Does anyone know which episode it is in? I don't remember it.Why hasn’t the attempted abduction of a child before MM made more news?