The caller was not known in 2020. We don’t know if that’s still the case or not.The mast was in proximity of the Ocean Club. Where was the caller is not known.
The caller was not known in 2020. We don’t know if that’s still the case or not.The mast was in proximity of the Ocean Club. Where was the caller is not known.
Completely agree. Your concern & compassion is shared.I imagine CB in his prison cell, undecided on how to play it. Take credit for MM's disappearance so he can take sick satisfaction in what he did or continue in silence, taking sick satisfaction in what people don't know.
I do think he's responsible. And I think he's sadistic, both in the crime and in the aftermath. It's fear he's after, and I think he likes that people are afraid of him.
If I were a surviving victim of his, I'd be afraid, very afraid once he gets out.
He's not done.
JMO
Yes. If you look up the reasons why, it has a lot to do with Germany's privacy laws. Also historical context, etc.
I'm not sure that many countries have it. We (UK) have a sex offenders register but I'm not sure that just anyone can access it or check someone's name on it.wow. That’s terrifying
Yes - we don’t know whether they’ve found the caller or not.The caller was not known in 2020. We don’t know if that’s still the case or not.
This! His letter, his mind, his checklist to not leave a trace, his plan, but IMO naive.Yes - we don’t know whether they’ve found the caller or not.
From comments they’ve made it seems like they have other evidence putting him the area. IMO the background of tourist videos or photos. That’s why I think he was cautious with describing his whereabouts in his letter.
Letter from prison is a freebie for the prosecution.![]()
Yes - he talked in the DM proceedings. Apparently the reason he hasn’t spoken during these trials, including for the minor offence is because any talking in court for open matters would make not talking in court for MM’s murder an incriminating factor.This! His letter, his mind, his checklist to not leave a trace, his plan, but IMO naive.
I guess he ended up never writing he didn't commit the crime. He preferred to mention what (several elements) BKA does not have to incriminate him.
Oh deary me. Maybe the, erm, 'researcher', international woman of mystery, Ms Luvva Luvva, might be named in court if there's a trial?What would be absolutely devastating for our money transferrer & ‘researcher’ is that his reply to *** may be that same incriminating factor. There’s more to this than I can relay in a few paragraphs. The donor is small fry but the mistake is not. Whoops!
Yes - Donation was expected. MSM choosing not to name/allow it a platform. Unlikely ***’ll be a name uttered at trial but CB’s written response may be an incriminating factor should he choose to remain silent.Oh deary me. Maybe the, erm, 'researcher', international woman of mystery, Ms Luvva Luvva, might be named in court if there's a trial?
JMO
That's why I wondered if potential charges for possession of indecent images were being kept in reserve. They could charge him with those offences just before he's due for release & argue that bail should be refused because he's a flight risk. That would keep him in custody pending trial on the image offences, giving them more time to improve the MM case (eg with analysis of whatever was fund in the latest search).So what. Would you prefer they bring an incomplete case to court than a good one with a chance of succeeding in getting justice for MM? I don't think this should be a race against time. Jmo
I think the wording here could be significant. It's entirely possible that they have no 'forensic evidence that Madeleine is dead' but they DO have strong evidence of some other aspect of the case, e.g. tourist photos of CB with MM (alive) or material of the sort suggested by @Megnut (fibres etc.). Such evidence wouldn't prove she was dead, but could prove that she was in his company.Just a reminder of that which HCW stated.
<snip>
He told the Channel 5 programme: “We have no forensic evidence that Madeleine is dead, we have no other results.
“I don’t know where the body is right now. If we knew, we would have found it.”
![]()
Investigators ‘have no forensic evidence that Madeleine McCann is dead
GERMAN investigators examining the disappearance of Madeleine McCann "have no forensic evidence" to suggest she is dead, despite believing that she has been killed.www.express.co.uk
It depends how much faith we put in the media reports that these were animal bones & adult clothing...I have always felt this baby wasn't alive. I feel these bones and clothes they found is most likely hers.
![]()
Madeleine McCann police find 'clothing and bones' in latest search update
German police have sent tiny fragments of clothing and bone recovered from the search to Germany for testing in the hope of providing a forensic breakthrough in the Madeleine McCann casewww.edinburghlive.co.uk
No type of evidence is more important than any other type. The case below is similar to that of MM because it was a cold case, the body has never been found, and it had huge media scrutiny - the podcast “The Teacher’s Pet” is very good IMO.I think the wording here could be significant. It's entirely possible that they have no 'forensic evidence that Madeleine is dead' but they DO have strong evidence of some other aspect of the case, e.g. tourist photos of CB with MM (alive) or material of the sort suggested by @Megnut (fibres etc.). Such evidence wouldn't prove she was dead, but could prove that she was in his company.
Every thing we read comes to us via media reports of one sort or another.It depends how much faith we put in the media reports that these were animal bones & adult clothing...
In that case they could be taking a gamble, in that the the court may reject their case out of hand.That's why I wondered if potential charges for possession of indecent images were being kept in reserve. They could charge him with those offences just before he's due for release & argue that bail should be refused because he's a flight risk. That would keep him in custody pending trial on the image offences, giving them more time to improve the MM case (eg with analysis of whatever was fund in the latest search).
IMO there could be another minor offence that we don’t know about. Obviously if they’ve uncovered another crime & it’s unrelated & easily proven - like ‘possession’, firearm offences or theft, then CB would rightly be dealt with by the courts.That's why I wondered if potential charges for possession of indecent images were being kept in reserve. They could charge him with those offences just before he's due for release & argue that bail should be refused because he's a flight risk. That would keep him in custody pending trial on the image offences, giving them more time to improve the MM case (eg with analysis of whatever was fund in the latest search).
It’s the latter. The donations are self-serving. If CB wasn’t the prime suspect in the MM case this type of behaviour would not happen. It’s about a man in a suit having the audacity to shun a movement (actually HCW is trying to solve a murder).Ha, We are not talking here about MM, these are fines for completely unrelated crimes he committed! Like beating a teenager and drink driving. Legal processes prescribe that he either pays or stays in jail for a couple of months. To have someone with no relation to CB (recalling that he had 0 defence witnesses) pay for these fines is despicable and can only be driven by 2 things : either another paedophile who lost his source or conspiracy theorists who think of CB as a patsy. And the real problem is that if it is the second category, they veil their craziness by talking about legality and preferring to pay for such a psychopath like CB to be freed Jmo.
This was one of the most public yet most secretive searches!It depends how much faith we put in the media reports that these were animal bones & adult clothing...