What a puzzlement and how strange.
What a total shambles. I struggle to believe this officer would not know what the penalities were for.
* When she learned that the penalties were actually to do with a number of infractions, including bodily harm, “it was already too late,” she said.
Weird.
No, she wasn’t happy with the bugging of his cell. It was reported during the trial that she was disgruntled at the BKA.Weird.
What's the theory? Motive?
Whose side is she on?
Hurrying his release to set him up to be a victim of vigilante justice, outside of prison?
Setting him up so she can shadow him and prevent his next crime?
Paying off everybody's fines or just his?
Weird.
JMO
Side? Truth and justice is the side to be on, and it's not in a German jail in relation to MM imo.Weird.
What's the theory? Motive?
Whose side is she on?
Hurrying his release to set him up to be a victim of vigilante justice, outside of prison?
Setting him up so she can shadow him and prevent his next crime?
Paying off everybody's fines or just his?
Weird.
JMO
The release date was always September if a fine was paid ,so its not pulling it forward, if the prosecution do not have enough evidence to charge then they do not ,no matter what date of his release.* When she learned that the penalties were actually to do with a number of infractions, including bodily harm, “it was already too late,” she said.
This is a good example of the problem with disgruntlement people, trolls & fangirls trying to be involved.
A ‘researcher’ has been obtaining funds from a ‘group’ - there is enough to pay his next fines from the upcoming cases. He will be out in September.
This smacks of the defence trying to create a narrative around any cell audio & this disgruntled woman’s donations could play to this. The defence may have engineered this. They want the trial going asap, hence pulling release date forward
One has to agrees with that completely; obviously truth and justice for MM lies within the files amassed over the years by investigating detectives.Side? Truth and justice is the side to be on, and it's not in a German jail in relation to MM imo.
Defence. Not surprising. The ‘researcher’ has also raised funds, so irrespective of this & the few grand he’ll be find fined next - he will be scheduled to be out in September. That’s an underground hysteria-fest & even if not a donator the awareness is thereWeird.
What's the theory? Motive?
Whose side is she on?
Hurrying his release to set him up to be a victim of vigilante justice, outside of prison?
Setting him up so she can shadow him and prevent his next crime?
Paying off everybody's fines or just his?
Weird.
JMO
Yes - truth lies in the German investigative file. My guess is that half a page of those files will be more immeasurably stronger than anything that’s come up before. Tbh a square foot of that box factory does the same thing.One has to agrees with that completely; obviously truth and justice for MM lies within the files amassed over the years by investigating detectives.
No, she wasn’t happy with the bugging of his cell. It was reported during the trial that she was disgruntled at the BKA.
I mentioned it in a prior post that there would be people who didn’t like the process that’s been followed.
Such is the desire to solve the case that corners are perhaps being cut.
I hope this pushes the prosecutors to charge him.
I’m curiously lost with choice of bait, especially when one also knows all about ‘group’ funding.Indeed so but nonetheless of interest.
One wonders if it would have been breaking a legal protocol for CB’s legal team to pay the fine.
That would have been ''end of''. Given that there is no question that whoever is paying CB's legal fees remains anonymous.
Three things there
So like all else concerning MM's disappearance all those years ago in conjunction with CB's latter day association with it, is all a bit of a conundrum.
- one is aware that German law will pay the legal representation of a suspect in atrial
- one wonders if the purse stretches far enough to pay for the services of the FF's of the legal world who spent a lot of time, therefore money, when recently representing him
- could be pro bono, perhaps
- indeed whoever paid CB’s fine ‘tis not an unexpected eventually particularly as it is a sum which was hardly going to break many banks
My opinion
Everything goes back to money and the lack of transparency associated with it. The stringency applied to prevent money laundering is intense which leads one to suggest that if the mystery donor's name has appeared in the press she may have been chosen as the 'patsy' whose identity was always intended to be leakedI’m curiously lost with choice of bait, especially when one also knows all about ‘group’ funding.
We’ve all said for months that his fines will be paid, the recent donator admitted to her naivety, the issue is hysteria messes with the ability to think rationally & behave normally.
I don't believe they've got anything. Sorry, it makes me sad and mad but I just don't.While there's nothing I'd like more than for CB to be charged and for the MM case to go to trial, they can still only charge him if the MM evidence they have is compelling. I'm not saying it isn't there, just that if it's now compelling, why wait to charge him?
All this 'noise' over the fine payment and his potential release date should have no bearing on that.
There's no reason to wait unless the BKA is still not confident that a charge based on what they have will get the go-ahead, that they're, instead, still living in hope that some miraculous 'game-changer' will fall into their laps at the 11th hour.
I really want them to come belt and braces and get this case to court. This is now so beyond the 'we're in no hurry' o'clock.
What do you mean?Side? Truth and justice is the side to be on, and it's not in a German jail in relation to MM imo.
As far as I know - the letter he sent to the ‘researcher’ was a mistake. Because in the period he’s refusing to co-operate & won’t answer to his whereabouts he’s sent out a letter to this fan, giving *** an explanation of what he was doing around that time. It’s also likely he caught himself in a lie. The defence have asked him to put a stop to this.Everything goes back to money and the lack of transparency associated with it. The stringency applied to prevent money laundering is intense which leads one to suggest that if the mystery donor's name has appeared in the press she may have been chosen as the 'patsy' whose identity was always intended to be leaked
Just one more example of disruptions which characterise so much of this case from the start and continues with the introduction of CB as a 'patsy' which in some eyes cleared him from then on in.
CB will stand trial in Germany given the calibre of the evidence against him is met and the judge agrees.
One senses a worried man right now. No wee ditties or cartoons goading the cops being published of late.
My opinion
We’ve been led to believe that there is a high bar for an indictment in Germany and this is supported with a conviction rate of mid-eighty percent in serious crimes like rape and murder.While there's nothing I'd like more than for CB to be charged and for the MM case to go to trial, they can still only charge him if the MM evidence they have is compelling. I'm not saying it isn't there, just that if it's now compelling, why wait to charge him?
All this 'noise' over the fine payment and his potential release date should have no bearing on that.
There's no reason to wait unless the BKA is still not confident that a charge based on what they have will get the go-ahead, that they're, instead, still living in hope that some miraculous 'game-changer' will fall into their laps at the 11th hour.
I really want them to come belt and braces and get this case to court. This is now so beyond the 'we're in no hurry' o'clock.