At what point, if any, can a mountain of circumstantial evidence, become ‘enough evidence’
Does the law of averages of all the circumstantial evidence become enough to test the law?
The guns; I think are part of the abduction process to scare and cause submission in all of CB’s activities, MOO.
However no one who has come forward had yet mentioned guns in any of his L, speculated crimes, that CB was cleared of.
But their presence to me adds to a grim picture.
I’m interested, as I said before in the adult clothing and any details we get- I hadn’t seen any reference to CB clothing until someone posted that maroon jumper from an attacker- (we don’t know this was CB) but unless BKA are looking for the only other clothing we know CB to have/ the white trousers in his arrand lake photos- this could be a link- perhaps to a different crime of CB’s
There are known clothing references in the media that I know of, that are only these two items, but there are probably more from witnesses perhaps that we don’t know and perhaps his own personal possessions- perhaps there some missing material from his favourite shirt from around 2004-2010 for example.
This is information I’m keen to hear more about when they are analysed and if they are made public. Assuming they were found and sent for testing…
I fought with the idea CB may have discarded anything so close to the apartments… but then I remember when this crime was committed no one knew how big the exposure would become. If you’ve been successful before, and perhaps you return to the scene of your fantasies/crimes maybe you would discard to later return to re live or to retrieve.
JMO