Madeleine McCann: German Prisoner Identified as Suspect, #41

In which case it would all be pretty much a waste of time and effort.

I think its pretty clear from the report that they have some data that they consider incriminating, even if it isn't clear cut
The search this year and last year's clearly show imo there's nothing clear cut, some of HCWs interviews he says we think.
 
In which case it would all be pretty much a waste of time and effort.

I think its pretty clear from the report that they have some data that they consider incriminating, even if it isn't clear cut
I cannot find a brand for the sat nav found at the box factory but I think we have to assume it’s the same one.

When he asks the question “Was my car seen…” it could be that he knows it wasn’t anywhere near 5A because he left on foot, or because he knows he wasn’t there - he could be protesting his innocence because he knows he’s innocent.
 
I cannot find a brand for the sat nav found at the box factory but I think we have to assume it’s the same one.

When he asks the question “Was my car seen…” it could be that he knows it wasn’t anywhere near 5A because he left on foot, or because he knows he wasn’t there - he could be protesting his innocence because he knows he’s innocent.
I replied to a different post before, re was my car seen, and I said, he could of been using someone else's, so he is trying be clever maybe. I would think someone not guilty would be more proclaiming innocent, as opposed to what he said, funny how he has made comments to the ex girlfriend ( the one from the kiosk). Saying to her he knows what happened as was there at the time,
 
I replied to a different post before, re was my car seen, and I said, he could of been using someone else's, so he is trying be clever maybe. I would think someone not guilty would be more proclaiming innocent, as opposed to what he said, funny how he has made comments to the ex girlfriend ( the one from the kiosk). Saying to her he knows what happened as was there at the time,
If you are looking for meaning, sometimes you’ll find it when it’s not there. I really don’t think we can tell from what he wrote.
 
Whist looking for the link , I also found this, and I new I read somewhere about him going back to Portugal, this is 2014, so after he received the letter. Also she was deported, it's good when you find info that you want

 
I replied to a different post before, re was my car seen, and I said, he could of been using someone else's, so he is trying be clever maybe. I would think someone not guilty would be more proclaiming innocent, as opposed to what he said, funny how he has made comments to the ex girlfriend ( the one from the kiosk). Saying to her he knows what happened as was there at the time,
CB doesn't need to scream from the roof tops of his innocence, all that he's heard is through news media, I doubt his defence is constantly in touch, the time for talking is when or if he ever reached court, he never said anything in his recent trial , look how that turned out.

The right to silence.

nemo tenetur se ipsum accusare

 
I cannot find a brand for the sat nav found at the box factory but I think we have to assume it’s the same one.

When he asks the question “Was my car seen…” it could be that he knows it wasn’t anywhere near 5A because he left on foot, or because he knows he wasn’t there - he could be protesting his innocence because he knows he’s innocent.

“Was I or my vehicle clearly seen near the crime scene on the night of the crime?"

Has he ever just outright denied anything to do with MM? Three words would suffice. "I am innocent"

Really, that's all he needs to say, instead of writing long rambling letters hoping to get a psychological hook into people. Look at MWT, he had him chasing all over Europe regarding the so called alibi and look what happened there, a big fat nothingburger. CB is probably enjoying the notoriety.

JMO

 
Last edited:
CB doesn't need to scream from the roof tops of his innocence, all that he's heard is through news media, I doubt his defence is constantly in touch, the time for talking is when or if he ever reached court, he never said anything in his recent trial , look how that turned out.

The right to silence.

nemo tenetur se ipsum accusare

He's also not the sort of person who would want to make things easy for the police - they are the enemy.
By saying nothing, he makes them work for every scrap of evidence, knowing that some of it will be worthless.
 
“Was I or my vehicle clearly seen near the crime scene on the night of the crime?"

Has he ever just outright denied anything to do with MM? Three words would suffice. "I am innocent"

Really, that's all he needs to say, instead of writing long rambling letters hoping to get a psychological hook into people. Look at MWT, he had him chasing all over Europe regarding the so called alibi and look what happened there, a big fat nothingburger. CB is probably enjoying the notoriety.

JMO
The thing is that he doesn't have to say anything.
He's been locked away in prison for years, so whatever he says isn't going to get him time off for good behaviour, so why bother ?
 
“Was I or my vehicle clearly seen near the crime scene on the night of the crime?"

Has he ever just outright denied anything to do with MM? Three words would suffice. "I am innocent"

Really, that's all he needs to say, instead of writing long rambling letters hoping to get a psychological hook into people. Look at MWT, he had him chasing all over Europe regarding the so called alibi and look what happened there, a big fat nothingburger. CB is probably enjoying the notoriety.

JMO

All these things are open to interpretation. A lot of work has been done convincing the world he murdered MM - perhaps he felt the need to say more.
 
Couple of other things from the docu, It must have been brought up at the time, not one of THe associated have definitely said phone no 680 is CBs.The 're the the of the jag was arranged previously, the man was even named and talked with MWT.
 
All these things are open to interpretation. A lot of work has been done convincing the world he murdered MM - perhaps he felt the need to say more.

Yes, the rambling letters have to be interpreted as written by an individual on the psychopathic spectrum.
A sadistic psychopath.


IMO Conning others through lying, manipulation, grandiosity and a glib form of charm -


 
Last edited:
<modsnip - quoted post was removed>

Not saying this to be a dick but I do think a circumstantial case is based on a narrative. It’s a story based on facts that makes any other way the crime could be committed impossible.

In this instance, it’s possible for the sat nav to indicate he was heading in the direction of PDL but then a gap during the critical time period.

If the link below is to be believed, they have him heading from somewhere to this place 12km from PDL, stationary for six hours, then his onward journey.

It seems likely that he was in or around PDL before this stop and if so bingo! It’s another part of the story.

However, the sat nav will also likely show that he was travelling in and around these areas at all hours every other day - he lived there and committed crime there… even in one of his letters he mentioned travelling at night on back roads or similar… that might be incriminating.

No doubt the BKA’s story puts him in the frame across different pieces of evidence - cell phone data, sat nav trips, emails etc. But, I think there are alternative, equally compelling, narratives that can also explain when, where and why he was at these places.

It might be worthwhile us listing all the evidence we think they have on him and then looking at these more closely to see if we can put some more of the pieces together.

Can anyone identify who is supposed to have been quoted saying ‘she was there for 6 hours’ please?
 
Yes, the rambling letters have to be interpreted as written by an individual on the psychopathic spectrum.
A sadistic psychopath.


IMO Conning others through lying, manipulation, grandiosity and a glib form of charm.


I suppose the same should apply to his emails - ramblings of a psycopath.
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
190
Guests online
848
Total visitors
1,038

Forum statistics

Threads
626,755
Messages
18,532,988
Members
241,119
Latest member
SteveH
Back
Top