He was one of the best sleuths in the MM case. Too bad he is not here anymoreIt is a good read. Dlk79 has MWT to a tee.![]()
He was one of the best sleuths in the MM case. Too bad he is not here anymoreIt is a good read. Dlk79 has MWT to a tee.![]()
MWT has proven himself to not be trustworthy. JC on the other hand, not so sure what he got wrong. His book is a great read with plenty of details.Only one is likely to be right though.
This is exactly what I am saying, the evidence they have placing him in pdl and surroundings could very well come from the inadmissible evidence at the box factory... so it is there, they know of it, but they cannot use it in court proceedings.Only if his presence in PDL after that date can be proved.
Perhaps he was meaning the town itself, rather than the surrounding area.
If CB says he wasn't in Luz and the BKA say he was but can't prove it then CB wins that hand.This is exactly what I am saying, the evidence they have placing him in pdl and surroundings could very well come from the inadmissible evidence at the box factory... so it is there, they know of it, but they cannot use it in court proceedings.
The only thing JC has done wrong is being a bold advocate for the McCann’s & a huge critic of CB.MWT has proven himself to not be trustworthy. JC on the other hand, not so sure what he got wrong. His book is a great read with plenty of details.
Is that the same JC who claims charges are coming year after year.MWT has proven himself to not be trustworthy. JC on the other hand, not so sure what he got wrong. His book is a great read with plenty of details.
The only thing JC has done wrong is being a bold advocate for the McCann’s & a huge critic of CB.
With JC it reads like a brewing grudge, with MWT it reads like a bloke that can’t walk in straight lines.
CB could have swimsuit fetish.Wonder how he got hold of them?
Did he go around stealing them from washing lines, as some men do with ladies' underware ?
That in itself could be significant.I suppose so. Seems a lot, but spread over a decade and a half it only amounts to a handful a year
It's from 2022?Ch5 link, not available out side the uk.
Well worth a read visit imo.
Synopsis from the mail.
![]()
Madeline McCann investigator sure Christian Brueckner didn't do it
An investigator for the case of Madeline McCann says convicted paedophile Christian Brueckner (pictured) is a monster, but that he isn't responsible for the young girl's disappearance.www.dailymail.co.uk
His number, but not using.Thanks that’s great sleuthing.
An alibi that can’t give him an alibi, his number but he wasn’t using - it’s quite nonsensical. Being pro CB, taking everything in isolation & pretending everything is a coincidence is daily chatter here but it’s hard to fathom why channel 5 tried to make a programme out of it.
So, what's happened since?It's from 2022?
Have huge reservations about info coming from the linked site ..<modsnip - quoted post was removed>
Not saying this to be a dick but I do think a circumstantial case is based on a narrative. It’s a story based on facts that makes any other way the crime could be committed impossible.
In this instance, it’s possible for the sat nav to indicate he was heading in the direction of PDL but then a gap during the critical time period.
If the link below is to be believed, they have him heading from somewhere to this place 12km from PDL, stationary for six hours, then his onward journey.
It seems likely that he was in or around PDL before this stop and if so bingo! It’s another part of the story.
However, the sat nav will also likely show that he was travelling in and around these areas at all hours every other day - he lived there and committed crime there… even in one of his letters he mentioned travelling at night on back roads or similar… that might be incriminating.
No doubt the BKA’s story puts him in the frame across different pieces of evidence - cell phone data, sat nav trips, emails etc. But, I think there are alternative, equally compelling, narratives that can also explain when, where and why he was at these places.
It might be worthwhile us listing all the evidence we think they have on him and then looking at these more closely to see if we can put some more of the pieces together.
![]()
“She was there for 6 hours”: satellite data uncovers an unmarked stop made by Christian Brueckner between 2:41 AM and 8:56 AM — 12 km from where Madeleine McCann vanished - News
The disappearance of Madeleine McCann, the three-year-old British toddler who vanished from a holiday apartment in Praia da Luz, Portugal, on May 3, 2007,newstvseries.com
Agree. It's utter rubbish and most probably AI generated IMO.Have huge reservations about info coming from this site ..
I looked at some other MM related stories further down the page , which included a headline about an MM bracelet being found .. but nothing about that in connected article ..
Another story about a suitcase being found in recent searches ..
An article about a 2am sighting of MM ..
None of these mentioned from any other sources ..
Yes - almost as if he’s a villain. The frustration is generally with the men - HCW, JG, JC, CM.Yes, the mention of JC always seems to touch a nerve and trigger some folk.
But, it's about the message, not him personally and IMO his book is great.
With what means? That he was in pdl at 8pm they have already established it. So is he then caught in a lie? BTW I was talking about his movements after and what and why could have led them to search the farmhouse and the well in atalaia. (And the Arade dam)If CB says he wasn't in Luz and the BKA say he was but can't prove it then CB wins that hand.
One can hope. His book is well researched and it is certain he had good sources. That is undeniable and gives an excellent account of the horrible person Cb isIs that the same JC who claims charges are coming year after year.
Clarrie Mitchell. A man paid to manage what was said about the case in the media. This point alone means we should be skeptical about what he said. Aside from him threatening legal action against anyone who challenged the official narrative, I find him a thoroughly unpleasant man.Who's CM?
Some of the swimsuits have the free swimmer sign on it. Children get it if they are able to swim 1/4 or half hour in the water. I remember my mother sewed it on my swimsuit. So he did not buy them. Stolen or collected.CB could have swimsuit fetish.
On the other hand they could be souvenirs of one kind or another.