Out of all the 'facts' listed above that supposedly tie DM in stronger than MS, only a couple are actual facts as we currently know them. Please explain to me how buying a condo makes someone appear guilty of murder? I would like to know because I was going to buy a condo, but I wouldn't want anyone to think I am a murderer for it. I may be having mechanical issues with one of my vehicles too, I hope no one thinks I stole a truck because of that. Oh no, I just realized that I also have a deceased father, that's three 'facts' that make me appear guilty of murder, according to the list above. My point is that most of the things above that are being described as proof of guilt are not facts at this point, nor are they evidence of a crime, in my opinion. Like I say, people buy condos, have car trouble or lose a parent all the time without it ever being used against them as proof of murder.
If MS were the innocent dupe being set up for a murder he didn't commit, why would DM set it up so that all the evidence points towards himself instead of MS? Isn't that the whole point of framing someone, to put the evidence at their feet instead of at your own? This just actually makes it sound as if the one who had already been to jail because of his past criminal record was smart enough to make it look like it was his friend instead of him. If DM was framing MS, why wouldn't he leave the truck at MS's place, why wouldn't he leave the body on MS's family property? Why wouldn't he be the one wearing his hood up like a disguise when they approached TB if he were the only one who knew what was going to happen?
Oh I see, facts above pertaining to your situation, not DM. :thinking: That's certainly an odd and interesting way a dissecting it but why would you make parallel comparisons to your situations and DM's? That's curious IMO. Nah typically condo buyers aren't considered murderers, just DM at this juncture that I'm aware of. I don't suspect you'll have any troubles with your purchase as long as you are law abiding. HTH.
Sure I don't mind explaining a theory about why DM purchased the condo May 7th. The purchase was to raise doubt as to why he would
steal a truck when he flashed hundreds or thousands of dollars to buy a condo the day after a truck was stolen. It would have been a definite "in your face" fact LE would have uncovered and MSM would report on early in the investigation, just as it happened...raising doubt. Steal a truck one day and the next day drop a load of cash on a condo, see how that works?
"Look I got hoards of money I don't need to steal a truck." Did I explain that well enough or would you like further explanation? HTH and MOO.
Isn't that the huge question people have been stumped with since DM's arrest?
Why would DM steal a truck when he could afford one or many? Absolutely it is. Even his lawyer voiced he wasn't financially hurting. It wasn't about not being able to afford a truck, it was likely about being frugal and doing something for a thrill. Speaking of frugal, DM spent a good chunk of money on the incinerator, maybe DM felt like he needed to get his money's worth out of it. One victim burnt wasn't enough. Scary to think more victims could have met their fate the same way had DM not been arrested when he was.
Interesting how for the 12 days MS was on the lam between DM's and his arrest, no one else was murdered, no Dodge trucks were stolen, no bodies were incinerated and the rest of the evidence wasn't covered up? Oops DM ran out of time and MS wasn't about to get involved in a murder he did not commit. MOO.
To answer your second paragraph, again DM simply ran out of time getting rid of evidence. If he was the real thief and murderer, why take the risk of disposing of a dead body on someone's property who you're trying to frame, leaving DNA, the chance of getting caught by someone or on surveillance etc. DM's plan was to destroy evidence and not leave it behind. As for framing, there are numerous way to do that in a not so obvious but slimy way; MS's cigarette butts, showing MS the gun and allowing him to hold it, leaving his prints and DNA on it, MS going along for the test drive leaving his DNA and prints behind. Those could be a few examples and I'm sure you can conjure up many more in your own mind Juballee. Could it be MS had his hood up because it was a cold night and they
may have walked a fair distance or been outside for some time? Many guys around MS's age walk around with the hoods of their hoodies up. So that's considered a disguise to you? Hope you're not suspicious of all those people out their with their hoods up. MOO.
The second man was shorter, at approximately 59 or 510, police said. He had a small to medium build with dark hair and was wearing a red hooded sweatshirt.
http://globalnews.ca/news/551499/hamilton-police-to-provide-update-on-tim-bosma-case/
The man was able to add to the description of the men Bosmas wife provided to police.
Both men are white and believed to be in their early 20s.
The first man is described as about 6-foot-1 or 6-foot-2, 170 to 180 pounds, with short light to medium brown hair, unshaven, wearing blue jeans, a long-sleeve orange shirt, running shoes and several tattoos on his arms.
Most notably of the tattoos was the word ambition, framed by a box, tattooed on his wrist where a person wears a watch, Kavanagh said.
The second man is 5-foot-9 or 5-foot-10, with a small to medium build, dark hair and wore a red hooded sweatshirt with the hood up over his head.
http://www.torontosun.com/2013/05/10/missing-hamilton-man-tim-bosnas-cell-phone-found-in-brantford
BTW I said, The fact
there are so many things linking DM to Tim's murder certainly makes him appear guilty. Again HTH and MOO.
JMO.
