Maxie's House

I actually think the competitive philanthropy is worse than the distraction. I'm curious if it truly is a competitive move or could it possibly be a strategic move from both sides?

I'm probably a bad one to ask this as I just automatically think JS cringes at this kind of stuff.... or maybe finds it amusing. I'm very open to being wrong on that, it's just difficult and messy to think he was really a part of it all.

But, your question made me wonder if JS is caught in an odd spot since AS was named in the lawsuit. I still think it's some possibility that AS was set up to take the fall (or maybe just confuse things ... which might have been successful already).

This is veering off track. But I see the donation thing as a way to get any positive PR and damage control. I think it is more and more difficult for DS to get much PR at all except through Maxie's House. But I wonder how many years you can keep throwing fund raisers without doing anything or making your finances public.

Could be she donated (something) now to instill some confidence in past and future donors before asking for more?
 
I'm probably a bad one to ask this as I just automatically think JS cringes at this kind of stuff.... or maybe finds it amusing. I'm very open to being wrong on that, it's just difficult and messy to think he was really a part of it all.

But, your question made me wonder if JS is caught in an odd spot since AS was named in the lawsuit. I still think it's some possibility that AS was set up to take the fall (or maybe just confuse things ... which might have been successful already).

This is veering off track. But I see the donation thing as a way to get any positive PR and damage control. I think it is more and more difficult for DS to get much PR at all except through Maxie's House. But I wonder how many years you can keep throwing fund raisers without doing anything or making your finances public.

Could be she donated (something) now to instill some confidence in past and future donors before asking for more?

BBM - I do believe JS is caught in an odd spot since AS is named in the WDS. I whole heartedly believe JS is tied up in the suit because of AS and likely only assisting the women because it also helps AS. I agree, JS may not have been involved in Rebecca's murder, but imo he is smack in the middle of the WDS. JS no doubt is a smart man. Smart enough to know how to use and set up a good PR piece.
 
BBM - I do believe JS is caught in an odd spot since AS is named in the WDS. I whole heartedly believe JS is tied up in the suit because of AS and likely only assisting the women because it also helps AS. I agree, JS may not have been involved in Rebecca's murder, but imo he is smack in the middle of the WDS. JS no doubt is a smart man. Smart enough to know how to use and set up a good PR piece.

What do you think he is assisting them with? I can't see DRS had that much publicity out of this (although I don't know why it's worth any publicity) and I think she has her own PR machine of sorts or the YMCA in this case. Not that I think JS wants to see any of this go forward since it seems he just wants to move on.
 
What do you think he is assisting them with? I can't see DRS had that much publicity out of this (although I don't know why it's worth any publicity) and I think she has her own PR machine of sorts or the YMCA in this case. Not that I think JS wants to see any of this go forward since it seems he just wants to move on.

I believe it is more than a coincidence the philanthropy of both DS and JS was publicized on the exact same day and just happened to be the same day Nina's lawyer responded to the WDS (Oct. 10th). I disagree about how much publicity Dina received from the donation. Google Dina's name and you will see just how many different outfits published or are talking about her donation.

Whether or not JS has anything to hide, I agree JS wants to move on. All of this happened in his home, his children, his girlfriend, his brother and his ex wife. Which is why I believe JS is assisting AS with his legal representation and most importantly likely offering the Zahau's a settlement. JS is the only person with enough money to make the WDS go away for all 3. In my opinion, JS only wants to help his brother and himself. Unfortunately for JS, helping his brother includes helping the twins.
 
BBM - I do believe JS is caught in an odd spot since AS is named in the WDS. I whole heartedly believe JS is tied up in the suit because of AS and likely only assisting the women because it also helps AS. I agree, JS may not have been involved in Rebecca's murder, but imo he is smack in the middle of the WDS. JS no doubt is a smart man. Smart enough to know how to use and set up a good PR piece.

I believe AS is named in the WDS for the sole purpose of putting JS in that "odd spot". After all, who has the deep pockets?
 
I believe AS is named in the WDS for the sole purpose of putting JS in that "odd spot". After all, who has the deep pockets?

I think Adam was complicit in murdering RZ and THAT'S why he is on the WDS. I think that Dina, in her resentment and smoldering rage helped. I think that Nina knew something was going down and did not stop it.
 
I think Adam was complicit in murdering RZ and THAT'S why he is on the WDS. I think that Dina, in her resentment and smoldering rage helped. I think that Nina knew something was going down and did not stop it.

I am well aware of what most posters believe. I am just stating my own opinion.
 
I went to Maxie's House Facebook page and the web site and couldn't find anything about a Halloween fundraiser this year. From last year's photos on FB, it looked like it was pretty successful--well attended and lots of fun for families together.

Has anyone seen anything about one for this year?
 
I believe it is more than a coincidence the philanthropy of both DS and JS was publicized on the exact same day and just happened to be the same day Nina's lawyer responded to the WDS (Oct. 10th). I disagree about how much publicity Dina received from the donation. Google Dina's name and you will see just how many different outfits published or are talking about her donation.

Whether or not JS has anything to hide, I agree JS wants to move on. All of this happened in his home, his children, his girlfriend, his brother and his ex wife. Which is why I believe JS is assisting AS with his legal representation and most importantly likely offering the Zahau's a settlement. JS is the only person with enough money to make the WDS go away for all 3. In my opinion, JS only wants to help his brother and himself. Unfortunately for JS, helping his brother includes helping the twins.

I'm not arguing you are wrong, because it could be. But could it be that DS knew about JS's philanthropy. I don't see what it would gain JS anyway, but to me, it kind of makes DS look worse that it was on the same day. That could be because I am jaded.

I don't think Dina got that much coverage. All of the articles are the same article as far as I have found and say "Copyright 2013 CBS 5 (KPHO Broadcasting Corporation). All rights reserved." Written by Phil Benson. Phoenix Arizona.


They are also all WorldNow Affiliates

KPTV (Oregon)
WFIE/14news (Southern IN)
WFSB (Connecticut)
KSWO (Lawton, OK/Wichita Falls/TX)
KFDA/newsChannel10 (Amarillo, TX) (article seems to be gone)

And, as you can see several of those are in small markets and certainly some in areas where people would have no idea who she is although it 'appears' to make an internet splash. These are small potatoes to me.

Thinking about it though, I have no idea why some (online) news in places like Portland, or Amarillo, or Evansville would have any interest in running a story about someone donating some undisclosed amount to the YMCA in Phoenix for a vague purpose of helping to furnish with toys and furniture.
 
The link on KPTV is:
kptv.membercenter.worldnow.com

WorldNow is more of a content management system, but may give access to some content one way or the other. More likely maybe is that these stations are somehow related and share content?

Other sites that picked up just the first few words then links offsite to another article are sites like this.... I think some of these pic up key words such as "YMCA" or "California" and publish articles a search finds with those terms.

newscastic.com
sportballa.com
i4u.com
phoenix.cityandpress.com
features.rr.com
digitis.us ("This entry was posted by fordrm on October 11, 2013 at 5:10 pm")

Sorry, I'm a bit obsessed with tracking this and still believe a huge reason for this recent donation has to do with collecting more money for her nonprofit.
 
The link on KPTV is:
kptv.membercenter.worldnow.com

WorldNow is more of a content management system, but may give access to some content one way or the other. More likely maybe is that these stations are somehow related and share content?

Other sites that picked up just the first few words then links offsite to another article are sites like this.... I think some of these pic up key words such as "YMCA" or "California" and publish articles a search finds with those terms.

newscastic.com
sportballa.com
i4u.com
phoenix.cityandpress.com
features.rr.com
digitis.us ("This entry was posted by fordrm on October 11, 2013 at 5:10 pm")

Sorry, I'm a bit obsessed with tracking this and still believe a huge reason for this recent donation has to do with collecting more money for her nonprofit.

Thank you for the research Time!

I don't know if the donations served a nefarious purpose for either DS or JS. However, I am very curious how both donations ended up being published/released on the same day? How does it work? Did Dina find out what JS was going to do with MaxInMotion and call KPTV or vice versa? Did she specifically ask them to release her info on Oct. 10th? Can you see where I'm going? Also, if you notice when you search Dina's name, the donation is currently the first story returned by a Google search. The donation changed the recent stories that appear when you query Dina Shacknai. Instead of the WDS or WS being the first info returned in a query, the donation now trumps all of them. Could it be possible this was the objective?
 
Thank you for the research Time!

I don't know if the donations served a nefarious purpose for either DS or JS. However, I am very curious how both donations ended up being published/released on the same day? How does it work? Did Dina find out what JS was going to do with MaxInMotion and call KPTV or vice versa? Did she specifically ask them to release her info on Oct. 10th? Can you see where I'm going? Also, if you notice when you search Dina's name, the donation is currently the first story returned by a Google search. The donation changed the recent stories that appear when you query Dina Shacknai. Instead of the WDS or WS being the first info returned in a query, the donation now trumps all of them. Could it be possible this was the objective?[/quote]


Interesting, and I would say YES! I wouldn't doubt she could have had it already to go, the press release written to be given to a 'journalist'. MaxInMotion donated around this time last year although I think it was in November. Curious about the timing, it could be that something appeared about MIM donation coming - like emails sent the day before or early that day?

I still am not sure why any paper would run the story on Dina donating unless she asked them to as it it so vague what kind and amount of help her money is even giving. It just looks too much like a promo piece for Dina and for MH instead of more about the YMCA project.
 
Thank you for the research Time!

I don't know if the donations served a nefarious purpose for either DS or JS. However, I am very curious how both donations ended up being published/released on the same day? How does it work? Did Dina find out what JS was going to do with MaxInMotion and call KPTV or vice versa? Did she specifically ask them to release her info on Oct. 10th? Can you see where I'm going? Also, if you notice when you search Dina's name, the donation is currently the first story returned by a Google search. The donation changed the recent stories that appear when you query Dina Shacknai. Instead of the WDS or WS being the first info returned in a query, the donation now trumps all of them. Could it be possible this was the objective?

Did we ever find out what or how much Dina donated? Was it $100 or a used couch she wanted to get rid of?

These kinds of competing PR stunts are sad. Both parties disgust me, very cold-hearted, self-centered, greedy people. JMO
 
Did we ever find out what or how much Dina donated? Was it $100 or a used couch she wanted to get rid of?

These kinds of competing PR stunts are sad. Both parties disgust me, very cold-hearted, self-centered, greedy people. JMO

What is very interesting to me is that this donation was phrased in the article as apparently from Dina as an individual-- not from Dina as a representative of Maxie's House. The brief article separates the 2 issues in the discussion, and the mention of Maxie's House is almost an after thought. The focus is clearly on Dina as the giver-- not her nonprofit. Either way, I hope it was a generous donation, as Dina can afford to be very generous, IMO. I hope it was at least $5000 or more-- that would go a long way for a program like the YMCA kids care programs.


A Valley mother whose 6-year-old son died at his father's California mansion last year has honored his memory by helping the Lincoln Family Downtown YMCA in Phoenix to complete its Amazing Kids Center.

Shacknai's donation will allow the branch to complete the area with furnishings, toys and other essential items.

BBM.

http://www.kpho.com/story/23661198/shacknai-gift-helps-phoenix-ymca-open-kids-center
 
When I google her on my iPad none of the donation info shows up at all.

You're right - it only shows up if you add other keywords like YMCA. I forgot that!

You're correct, as of now the donation does not appear first in a internet search. If you googled her name on Oct. 10th and the week after, her donation was the first returned search. It also depends on your search settings. You can search by the last 24hrs, 1 week, etc...I did not have to enter YMCA the week Dina made her donation. A Google search on Dina Shacknai returned stories on her donation. That is how I found out about the donation.
 
I went to Maxie's House Facebook page and the web site and couldn't find anything about a Halloween fundraiser this year. From last year's photos on FB, it looked like it was pretty successful--well attended and lots of fun for families together.

Has anyone seen anything about one for this year?

No, there is no publicity about a 2nd Annual Halloween Party for 2013.

It seems that Maxie's House is in a "quiet" phase. Nothing new has been posted on the website, and no fundraisers have been promoted for many months now (9 months, or so). The last relevant activity appears to be the posting of the video promoting the parental disclosure proposal, from Feb 17, 2013, with 500-ish views on YouTube. If Dina plans to pursue the parental disclosure proposal for a bill that she promoted in the August Phoenix Magazine interview, she will have to ramp up a bit in advance of the next AZ Legislative session, IMO. (But I assume there are possibly more pressing matters than Maxie's House to attend to at present, with the wrongful death lawsuit. JMO.)
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
111
Guests online
1,550
Total visitors
1,661

Forum statistics

Threads
623,387
Messages
18,466,992
Members
240,368
Latest member
angyl8389
Back
Top