msphilosopher
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2017
- Messages
- 1,429
- Reaction score
- 1,872
Oh, oops! Then disregard my theory.![]()
I mean, I can't source that until MSM publishes info on the husband.
Another could be her mom's maiden name? idk...
Oh, oops! Then disregard my theory.![]()
I mean, I can't source that until MSM publishes info on the husband.
Another could be her mom's maiden name? idk...
Nope, not her mom's maiden name as that is on Jeanette's 1983 marriage record:
https://www.ancestry.com/interactiv...src=BES2&_phstart=successSource&usePUBJs=true
(Smith).
Maybe she married twice ? From the marriage licence you found, What the chance two woman with same name and their father also has same name live in the same county?
Looks like most of charges were Misdemeanors, only one was felony for forgery
It was more the number of them she had and all in such a short time span.
She had a 'CDS-unlawful Mfgr etc' felony charge. I have no clue what that is. And 2 other misdemeanors, unlawful possession and obstructing. These were all dismissed.
It makes me wonder who she was hanging around with and what they might have been mixed up in. What she might have known.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I think that stands for forgery
It was a forgery case, and John's bail was only 5000 dollars, does not seem like a very serious case, and from his records, except for one case of domestic violence against Jeannie, his offense mainly were forging check, unlawful procession, shoplifting etc. nothing violent, I do not think Fed would offer any kind of witness protection program in this kind of caseI think the CDS charge against both of them is interesting. Jeannie’s was dismissed. John’s stops at bail and appears to never be processed further.
Wouldnt CDS-UNLAWFUL MFGR (CJIS code 2-3550) constitute a serious felony in Maryland? According to this table, it is a felony category IV:It was a forgery case, and John's bail was only 5000 dollars, does not seem like a very serious case, and from his records, except for one case of domestic violence against Jeannie, his offense mainly were forging check, unlawful procession, shoplifting etc. nothing violent, I do not think Fed would offer any kind of witness protection program in this kind of case
It was obvious this John Allen was a bad influence, Jennie did not have any criminal records before 1985, I would guess she met John some time in 1984, she divorced her first husband Yang and married John (her last name was Allen in that battery case in September 1984), after that she was mixed with wrong crowd
Strange they have a last seen date of February 1986 while in news reports and Sheriffs blog it says April 1986.Jeanette has been added to Charley Project: http://charleyproject.org/case/jeanette-florence-allen-ratino
Strange they have a „last seen“ date of February 1986 while in news reports and Sheriff‘s blog it says April 1986.
Jeannie Allen Ratino went to Northern High School in Calvert County, MD, and yes, that is a yearbook photo. I did not know that she was married to a Mr. Yang. I know she was married to a young man with the last name of Allen who also went to Northern High School. I think his name was John, but I am not certain.