I've seen people say that it happened at 3:20 AM -- Does anyone know the source for that? The LAPD confirms the date and the LAPD division, but I haven't seen where people have figured out the time of the incident, especially when nobody has found a report of the incident.
On that point, I'm assuming people are searching crimemapping.com to try and find it, which is linked from the LAPD's website. I also can't find a burglary on March 26th in the right area after dark. But a few observations:
1) The website doesn't use the legal definition of assault (seems to use the common definition, referring to a battery), and I'm also not sure how crimes get reported for this purpose when there were multiple crimes committed. Would an assault that didn't involve a gun and didn't result in battery be reported to crime mapping? Does a single incident that violates multiple penal code sections get listed multiple times, or just under one? My thinking -- could it have been missed because of how it was categorized?
2) I used to get the crime blotters for my old neighborhood emailed to me. I recall noting in the past that shootings and homicides that I knew had happened in my area because they made the news wouldn't end up appearing in the crime map when I later checked (happened at least once, but I feel like I noticed this more than once). Never knew why, but I remember finding it concerning.
3) I searched burglaries on March 26, 2023 for the agency LAPD as well as burglaries on March 26, 2023 within 2 miles of the LAPD division station that took the report (not perfect correlation to the boundaries, but approximate). 3 results appeared for all of LAPD, and 1 appeared for the geographic search of the neighborhood. As noted, none seem to fit the information that has been released. But what I noticed is that the one that appeared in the geographic search is not one of the 3 that appeared in the agency search. I can't see any reason for that (and that one was specifically listed as LAPD - the geographic search does pick up some crimes that fall under the county's jurisdiction, but I checked for that). So unless I'm missing something, it's screwy.
So yeah, it appears to not be reliable -- for that reason, I find it curious, but not suspicious. And the LAPD would be foolish to address it, because crime reports identify the block a crime happened on and with that information combined with the video, anyone could quickly find out the victim's address. (I read that some sleuths had already figured it out, but that would at least not have been a quick process).
(Edited to remove information identifying the specific neighborhood.)