- Joined
- Nov 18, 2022
- Messages
- 362
- Reaction score
- 5,442
The Minnesota National Guard (under Governor Walz’s order) have been giving out donuts and coffee to anti-ICE protestors today.
I hope Alex's parents don't see those videos. Totally disrespectful way to deal with a deceased person. This and another case have gutted me. A brother nurse. A compassionate man helping others. I watched a video where Alex read a beautiful piece to eulogize a deceased veteran whom was surrounded by staff. The veteran's body was draped on a stretcher. He was a patient of Alex's that had died. The veteran was treated with dignity and respect. What a contrast in the way that Alex handled the veteran's death and the desecration at Alex's passing. I am both outraged and despondent.I think that one of the most disturbing parts of the videos is that, after he was shot several times, ICE agents start playing with the body - rifling through his pockets, shoving him around, looking like pick pockets.
Please note: analyzing the events that unfolded does not equate with declaring that the shooting was justified.If we want to change the Constitution, there's a process for that. But in the meantime, the articles and videos posted throughout this thread show, without a doubt in my mind, that Pretti was acting within his Constitutional rights. He had a right to be there. He had a right to be observing/filming (there's no stipulation on distance). He had a right to have a gun in its holster. He had a right to help a woman off the ground.
So is the argument that one can now be justifiably killed by the government for exercising their rights as American citizens? I don't get it.
MOO.
looking for the ID they said he did not have on him? did he just walk there not drive?Mmmhm, saw and thought this as well, possibly hoping to disguise it as 'first aid' imo.
Please note: analyzing the events that unfolded does not equate with declaring that the shooting was justified.
But, there's always a but ... the woman in the white coat and black toque, who was eventually shoved by ICE, was talking to ICE agents when everything went wrong. Why was she, an "observer", talking to ICE agents?
Could that be interpreted as crossing the line of non-interference with federal ICE agents conducting an arrest? That interaction triggered everything that followed.
green: white Coat woman following ICE agents, talking to him
red: Ice Agent looking back at white coat woman
Pretti: escorting a woman away from possible confrontation?
View attachment 639568
green: white coat woman is still interacting with ICE agent
red: ICE agent giving her his full attention
Pretti: looking back and paying attention to white coat woman
View attachment 639569
green: white coat woman still talking to ICE agent ... saying what?
red: ICE agent shoves woman in white coat
Pretti: giving full attention to woman talking to ICE agent
View attachment 639570
green: woman in white coat slipped and fell on snow
red: ICE agent grabbing Pretti's hand
Pretti: stepped in between ICE agent and woman who was talking to ICE agent
View attachment 639574
When the nurse (Pretti) tried to help the woman in the white coat stand up, ICE agents may have assumed that they were together. That is when more agents approached and tackled Pretti.
If the woman in the white coat had observed, and not interacted with ICE agents, would Pretti have been shot?
Guardian News:
Yes. Because this is the second time, and because an additional civil liberty is being threatened.They seem to be having more pressers than in Renee's case.
Maybe they are getting a lot more push-back for this killing.
imo
Per the media interview with the ICE department (linked upthread), he said that civilians should not interfere with the duties of federal officers. Observing is fine, taking video is fine. In both of these screen shots, it does not look like a friendly conversation. In my opinion, it looks like a confrontation.Why wouldn't she? There is no rule that she isn't allowed to talk to ICE agents. And do we know that they didn't engage her first?
I don't know what purpose it would serve to try to decipher what ICE agents interpreted as (a) none of us know, (b) none of us will ever truly know, (c) none of it justifies killing someone in the back numerous times, IMO. But let's just say we wanted to go there, there is no law that they're not allowed to communicate with ICE and there's no evidence whatsoever (that I'm aware of) that shows her interfering with operations.
I mean, we can probably play that game a few different ways. If ICE had been better trained, would Pretti have been shot? If national leaders had toned down the rhetoric, would Pretti have been shot? If the Good investigation hadn't been halted before it even started, would Pretti have been shot? The bottom line is blaming a bystander or even wondering about her contribution in a situation where a federal agent discharged his weapon (10 times? Not sure how many) into a person who was no longer a threat is a waste of time, IMO.
MOO.
"You may not speak to law enforcement officers operating on a public street or else you may get another bystander mistakenly shot ten times in the back" is not the America my ancestors fought and died to protect. The rules of force on civilians for law enforcement are meant to reflect a standard of utmost responsibility and restraint, not give armed agents every possible benefit of the doubt and the right to make countless mistakes resulting in the deaths of bystanders with no repercussions.But, there's always a but ... the woman in the white coat and black toque, who was eventually shoved by ICE, was talking to ICE agents when everything went wrong. Why was she, an "observer", talking to ICE agents? Could that be interpreted as crossing the line of non-interference with federal ICE agents conducting an arrest? That interaction triggered everything that followed.
I think that the donut shop owner just locked the door?
Bovino said that the operation in Minneapolis had originally been targeting Jose Huerta-Chuma, who he described as a dangerous undocumented immigrant who needed to be taken off the streets.
He said Huerta-Chuma was in the process of being taken into custody when “agitators, rioters and anarchists” prevented the arrest.
According to DOC records and Minnesota court data, the individual has never been in Minnesota DOC custody and has no felony commitments.
![]()
Minneapolis shooting: Obama and Clinton urge Americans to ‘stand up’ as more Republicans call for an investigation – live
Some elected officials condemn Trump’s federal surge in Minnesota and say DHS agents should leave Minnesotawww.theguardian.com
Per the media interview with the ICE department (linked upthread), he said that civilians should not interfere with the duties of federal officers. Observing is fine, taking video is fine. In both of these screen shots, it does not look like a friendly conversation. In my opinion, it looks like a confrontation.
View attachment 639617
see video
![]()
Beelden van doodgeschoten burger Minneapolis spreken kamp-Trump tegen
Uit de video's en ooggetuigenverslagen blijkt dat Pretti geen wapen in zijn handen hield, maar juist een telefoon. Deze feiten staan haaks op uitspraken van de federale overheid.nos.nl
View attachment 639618
Guardian News video
There's no question that excessive force was used, but it doesn't appear to start with excessive force. It appears to start with confrontations between protesters and ICE agents.
Please note: analyzing the events that led up to the shooting does not equate with believing that the shooting was justified."You may not speak to law enforcement officers operating on a public street or else you may get another bystander mistakenly shot ten times in the back" is not the America my ancestors fought and died to protect. The rules of force on civilians for law enforcement are meant to reflect a standard of utmost responsibility and restraint, not give armed agents every possible benefit of the doubt and the right to make countless mistakes resulting in the deaths of bystanders with no repercussions.
JMO
End of.The ICE approached Alex and pushed him. Then moments later they were all on top of him and killed him.
A witness/physician who gave a sworn statement that he was temporarily prevented from rendering aid but was allowed to help ultimately. He said that the federal agents had Alex on his side rather than on his back to do chest compressions, and he stated that it appeared to him that the agents were counting bullet wounds.Mmmhm, saw and thought this as well, possibly hoping to disguise it as 'first aid' imo.
do the ICE officers ask people to step back and then push them if they do not move? The shoving of the woman in the white coat seems aggressive but I have not personally seen any of these actions. She does wind up on the ground.Please note: analyzing the events that unfolded does not equate with declaring that the shooting was justified.
But, there's always a but ... the woman in the white coat and black toque, who was eventually shoved by ICE, was talking to ICE agents when everything went wrong. Why was she, an "observer", talking to ICE agents? Could that be interpreted as crossing the line of non-interference with federal ICE agents conducting an arrest? That interaction triggered everything that followed.
green: white Coat woman following ICE agents, talking to him
red: Ice Agent looking back at white coat woman
Pretti: escorting a woman away from possible confrontation?
View attachment 639568
green: white coat woman is still interacting with ICE agent
red: ICE agent giving her his full attention
Pretti: looking back and paying attention to white coat woman
View attachment 639569
green: white coat woman still talking to ICE agent ... saying what?
red: ICE agent shoves woman in white coat
Pretti: giving full attention to woman talking to ICE agent
View attachment 639570
green: woman in white coat slipped and fell on snow
red: ICE agent grabbing Pretti's hand
Pretti: stepped in between ICE agent and woman who was talking to ICE agent
View attachment 639574
When the nurse (Pretti) tried to help the woman in the white coat stand up, ICE agents may have assumed that they were together. That is when more agents approached and tackled Pretti.
If the woman in the white coat had observed, and not interacted with ICE agents, would Pretti have been shot?
Guardian News:
Please note: analyzing the events that led up to the shooting does not equate with believing that the shooting was justified.
It appears that Pretti had a conversation with the ICE officers earlier, and then he was in the middle of an ICE officer shoving the woman in the white coat.