if his actions weren't suicidal, (mod edit no name calling) IMO. so which do you want to believe? saving this country requires both the red and the blue to wake up and see that the fighting is artificial, manufactured by the rich elite to keep the status quo, maintaining their wealth at any costs- even if civil war MOO. Apparently I am open minded enough to allow the investigation to suggest suicide or homicide, without being personally offended. I love this site, and everyone's honest opinions.
I'm hopeful that there are some others that might be saved by having an understanding of this very sentence....though I'd edit it back to my original thought, in my opinion, he'd be alive today if he had not inserted himself into the situation. The entire situation is much more than the individual incident. It's political. It's social. It's personal. It's already escalated to prior violence and death. It wasn't just the incident with the woman. It's my opinion he obviously either sought out or went directly to that location with a purpose. There is evidence already in existence this was not his first encounter, said evidence posted on this thread. Was his presence legal? Yes. Was his carry of a firearm legal? Yes. Did he exercise poor judgement considering the totality of the circumstances? In my opinion, yes.
I'm not saying it, what I'm saying is in my opinion the law may determine it so.You are really saying that it is possible that after we learn all the facts, that the agents who shot him did the right thing?
I get that they have a professional duty to tread a line between both sides. But.......the situation would have been avoided if they had simply walked away when they lost their quarry in the donut shop, rather than choosing to assault people doing nothing more than exercising their constitutional rights.But they were unanimous in saying that the situation probably could have been avoided by employing basic policing tactics that prioritize public safety and communication." https://www.washingtonpost.com/immi...lex-pretti-minneapolis-border-patrol-tactics/
IMO experts in the field are speaking out because this reflects poorly on the profession as a whole. That it's not the norm, not what they are taught.I get that they have a professional duty to tread a line between both sides. But.......the situation would have been avoided if they had simply walked away when they lost their quarry in the donut shop, rather than choosing to assault people doing nothing more than exercising their constitutional rights.
There's someone that knows: S.Miller has his own poster. IMObbm
For the second week in a row, thousands of people in downtown Minneapolis marched to protest the presence of immigration enforcement agents in their city. Demonstrations were also organized in other U.S. cities, including Los Angeles, Boston, New York, and Portland, Maine.View attachment 640763
![]()
Photos: Thousands once again protest ICE in Minneapolis and across the U.S.
Demonstrators in Minneapolis and other U.S. cities participated in protests as part of a "national shutdown" to end immigration enforcement operations.www.whro.org
You must have watched the extended play version of the murder of Alex Pretti. Where can I watch the video that illustrates your points?My hypothesis on Jan 24, 2026, Alex Pretti shooting: suicide by proxy (suicide by cop) + volenti non fit injuria. Studies show 10-36% of OIS involve SBC (Mohandie 2009; Hutson 1998).Key points:
Reframes as Pretti's agency/"original sin," not just agent failure. Aligns w/ Graham v. Connor reasonableness amid uncertainty. Not victim-blaming if orchestrated via attempts.No direct proof beyond public info. Suggest psych autopsy/expert review of comms/records.
- Constructive intent: Brought 9mm + extra mags to armed fed confrontation, creating lethal zone. Returned post-Jan 13 with more ammo—why if no intent to harm self/others?
- Fog of uncertainty: Armed resistance forced "plus one" threat assumption per CBP training. Continued struggle post-disarmament sustained fear.
- Rehearsal: Jan 13 videos show erratic behavior (expletives, spitting, escape w/o drawing)—desensitized him for Jan 24 escalation. Ambivalence common in SBC.
- Mindset: 2024 VA tribute choked up on "sacrifice for freedom"—suggests openness to martyrdom.
The mission statement of Stephen Miller, Donald Trump, ICE, CBP, Krist Noem and now Tom Homan, the border Czar seem to follow the sarcastic saying that started circling in the 1970s : Beatings (killings) will continue until morale improves.Its very similar to domestic abuse too
- As long as the woman has the dinner ready on time she doesn't get beaten
It's a look at what You Made ME do - if you only behaved I would not of had to kill you.
VICTIM BLAMING
SOSOSO TWISTED
JMO