Meredith Kercher murdered-Amanda Knox appeals conviction #15

[Allusonz]

My remark: "Mignini was consistent enough regarding the prosecution of Knox and Sollecito for eleven long months that the jury found the pair guilty."

What do you mean "which motive was that?"

The prosecutor was consistent in his statements for at least 11 months, and we know it was longer, so why do you suggest that he makes things up or is inconsistent? The jury, no different than any highly respected US jury, concluded that the pair were guilty. If the prosecutor was wishy washy, surely they would have noticed?

Give it a rest ... prosecutors can say anything they want, or nothing at all, after the trial ... as their job is over. Whether Knox caused the fatal blow or stood in another room with her fingers sticking in her ears - it makes no difference in terms of complicity and guilt ... or do you mean to argue that because Knox may have been in the next room with her fingers stuck in her ears, that she should be excused from the murder that happened in the next room?

No Otto he was not. Maybe in his imagination but not as the head of an investigation. If the forensics do not match the theory you must revisit the theory. The only thing he is now trying to do is salvage his career much like Nifong did

 

[Allusonz]

That is perhaps where you are mistaken.

There is in fact enough evidence to convict and the conviction has been dealt - along with a 26 year sentence. Much as the parents wish it were not so, it is so.

Not mistaken. A miscarriage of justice

 

[otto]

It is not a leak. Look at the PDF file. It was filed with the Court and like most documents unless sealed can be obtained. One though has to look at it to see the stamp first though

What pdf files? The report was leaked Tuesday evening/Wednesday but was not due until Thursday. That is a leak, especially since it will not be introduced in court until July 25, 2011. Leaks are okay if they are opportune for the convicted murderer, but inopportune if impuning the convicted murderer?

 

[otto]

Not mistaken. A miscarriage of justice

You are mistaken, and Meredith Kercher deserves justice ... even if it involves the boring woman from Seattle.

 

[Allusonz]

You are mistaken, and Meredith Kercher deserves justice ... even if it involves the boring woman from Seattle.

I am not mistaken and yes she does but not from people that have become emotionally involved. The evidence to convict is simply not there. The prosecution does not have enough evidense to convict them and never did. It was a railroad job

 

[otto]

I am not mistaken and yes she does but not from people that have become emotionally involved. The evidence to convict is simply not there. The prosecution does not have enough evidense to convict them and never did. It was a railroad job

If emotionally involved people should not interfere with justice, perhaps everyone should step back and respect the jury's decision.

How can you say that the evidence to convict is not there? You don't speak Italian, did not attend the trial and don't know anything about it. What you are saying is that you do not trust the decision of the jury just because.

 

[Allusonz]

What pdf files? The report was leaked Tuesday evening/Wednesday but was not due until Thursday. That is a leak, especially since it will not be introduced in court until July 25, 2011. Leaks are okay if they are opportune for the convicted murderer, but inopportune if impuning the convicted murderer?

Read any newspaper. The experts filed their report early. That would be the envy of most instructors to have such a paper submitted early that has been done with due dilligence

 

[Allusonz]

If emotionally involved people should not interfere with justice, perhaps everyone should step back and respect the jury's decision.

How can you say that the evidence to convict is not there? You don't speak Italian, did not attend the trial and don't know anything about it. What you are saying is that you do not trust the decision of the jury just because.

Not buying the jury stuff anymore. The jury got it wrong

 

[otto]

That is the best argument you can come up with?

I would like to know who the "We" is in "we get that you don't like her" so I know whom to address in my response to your "we get that you don't like her" remark. Who is "we" ... you?

 

[otto]

Not buying the jury stuff anymore. The jury got it wrong

Every jury gets it wrong when a victim is brutally murdered ... right? Or is it only wrong when the murderer is an American woman with crying parents.

 

[Allusonz]

I would like to know who the "We" is in "we get that you don't like her" so I know whom to address in my response to your "we get that you don't like her" remark. Who is "we" ... you?

Why not get back to the facts of the case. This can't be done as the facts that have been spouted off for so long are not there

 

[otto]

Read any newspaper. The experts filed their report early. That would be the envy of most instructors to have such a paper submitted early that has been done with due dilligence

Ah, but you are concerned about leaks ... when the DNA report was leaked weeks early, is that not a problem anymore (when it favors your murderer)?

 

[otto]

Why not get back to the facts of the case. This can't be done as the facts that have been spouted off for so long are not there

Who is your "we"?

Please answer the question.

 

[Allusonz]

Every jury gets it wrong when a victim is brutally murdered ... right? Or is it only wrong when the murderer is an American woman with crying parents.

This has nothing to do with where you are born. The only one that seems to think so is yourself as you continue to bring it up in your arguments.

Just like science knows no boundaries. Science does not recognize international borders. I could care less what country you are from and I still don't get why you think I am American when I am not...

 

[Allusonz]

Who is your "we"?

Please answer the question.

I did throughout many threads of this forum.

 

[Allusonz]

BTW, you remind me of Jason Young when he said "you came here for that?"

:floorlaugh::floorlaugh::floorlaugh:

too funny

 

[otto]

This has nothing to do with where you are born. The only one that seems to think so is yourself as you continue to bring it up in your arguments.

Just like science knows no boundaries. Science does not recognize international borders. I could care less what country you are from and I still don't get why you think I am American when I am not...[/QUOTE]

Just imagine if Meredith Kercher were American and Knox were from the Ivory Coast. I don't doubt for a moment that the victim would be clearly identified ... and Knox would never be discussed on forums as the poor little victim who got stoned out of her head and couldn't remember a thing the next day ... oops about the roommate.

Knox is the woman from Seattle ... nothing to do with you.

Cheers.

 

[otto]

:floorlaugh::floorlaugh::floorlaugh:

too funny

It actually wasn't funny when Jason Young said "you came here for that".

 

[Allusonz]

This has nothing to do with where you are born. The only one that seems to think so is yourself as you continue to bring it up in your arguments.

Just like science knows no boundaries. Science does not recognize international borders. I could care less what country you are from and I still don't get why you think I am American when I am not...[/QUOTE]

Just imagine if Meredith Kercher were American and Knox were from the Ivory Coast. I don't doubt for a moment that the victim would be clearly identified ... and Knox would never be discussed on forums as the poor little victim who got stoned out of her head and couldn't remember a thing the next day ... oops about the roommate.

Knox is the woman from Seattle ... nothing to do with you.

Cheers.

Once again this is not about nationality. This is about evidence. I cannot repeat that enough

 

[Allusonz]

It actually wasn't funny when Jason Young said "you came here for that".

I know but you brought it up which you thought I had not followed the case