cjharrah
New Member
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2014
- Messages
- 14
- Reaction score
- 0
CJ Mom,
Yes, it is technically considered hearsay, but there are many variants of hearsay in Michigan and federal evidence rules. There is both admissible and inadmissible hearsay. In this case, there are many exceptions that apply to the rule of hearsay that would allow the inmate's information to be presented before a court of law. I won't get into those as they're not relevant, but if you get the go-ahead from your supervisor, I don't see why you wouldn't be able to gather information from the "inside," so to speak. You never know where a lead might come from. I'm surprised LE didn't think of this, though, I suppose in this case, they would have no rational basis to think someone who has been previously convicted and is incarcerated might have some insidious information concerning the CB case.
Source: I am a current 2nd year law student.
All of the above are JMO. I do not hold myself out to be an expert on the law in any way, shape, or form.
Yes, it is technically considered hearsay, but there are many variants of hearsay in Michigan and federal evidence rules. There is both admissible and inadmissible hearsay. In this case, there are many exceptions that apply to the rule of hearsay that would allow the inmate's information to be presented before a court of law. I won't get into those as they're not relevant, but if you get the go-ahead from your supervisor, I don't see why you wouldn't be able to gather information from the "inside," so to speak. You never know where a lead might come from. I'm surprised LE didn't think of this, though, I suppose in this case, they would have no rational basis to think someone who has been previously convicted and is incarcerated might have some insidious information concerning the CB case.
Source: I am a current 2nd year law student.
All of the above are JMO. I do not hold myself out to be an expert on the law in any way, shape, or form.