- Joined
- Feb 14, 2021
- Messages
- 4,786
- Reaction score
- 9,893
Bill
Wonderful news!She is undergoing forensic genetic genealogy as per Misty Gillis of Identifinders (around 24 minute mark of the video):
A further Identifiers update from 2024, Colleen Fitzpatrick mentions this case at the 50:25 minute mark and the background spreadsheet indicates her DNA was in sequencing www.youtube.com/watch?v=eIgedyT0fQIShe is undergoing forensic genetic genealogy as per Misty Gillis of Identifinders (around 24 minute mark of the video):
Per Doe Network, "Bill" has the following identifiers available:Does anyone know if the unidentified "Bill" Jane Doe from 1976's DNA is not available because it's unattainable? Or because they just haven't extracted any DNA from the remains yet? Asking because I emailed DNA Doe Project hoping for them to set up a funding case for DNA identification of "Bill"
I think they were asking why DNA is unavailable. Some people don't have DNA available because it's gone forever (cremations and people whose remains were subjected to extreme heat and chemicals), some people don't have DNA available because its location is unknown but could be gathered in the future (unknown burial/storage locations), and some people don't have it available simply because it hasn't been gathered yet.Per Doe Network, "Bill" has the following identifiers available:
Dentals: Available. Some of her upper front teeth overlapped slightly. No fillings or cavities.
Fingerprints: Available.
DNA: Not available.
Thank you for clarifying. That's good to know!I think they were asking why DNA is unavailable. Some people don't have DNA available because it's gone forever (cremations and people whose remains were subjected to extreme heat and chemicals), some people don't have DNA available because its location is unknown but could be gathered in the future (unknown burial/storage locations), and some people don't have it available simply because it hasn't been gathered yet.
There's actually several people listed as "DNA unavailable" on Doe Network who have since been identified through DNA just because that's what it said on NamUs when the page was created and you could still see what identifiers they had.
Looking further up the thread, it appears that this is an example of the third option; they do have her DNA and she's been a case with Identifinders since last year. @ledzha77 since you were the one who originally asked.Thank you for clarifying. That's good to know!
Interested to know what you think they potentially may have @Moev ? Are you trying to get a progress report on the genetic genealogy research being done by Identifinders?I had requested through FOIA on potentially getting the case file for this case to see if they potentially have anything. Will update if I hear back.
Mostly curious if there's other information available that might not be included on NAMUS. I notice a lot of cases often miss certain details that can always lead to better understanding the case and if what is being reported is accurate.Interested to know what you think they potentially may have @Moev ? Are you trying to get a progress report on the genetic genealogy research being done by Identifinders?
It's a shame there isn't a photo of Donna to see if she looks anything like this Doe. Certainly worth a rule out, anyway!Donna Chambers was reported missing on February 27, 1976 from Carlingford, New Brunswick (a border town). She had been walking from her house to the local dump and was picked up in an unknown vehicle. Donna was never located although the belief was she had gone to live in the USA voluntarily.