Former coworker felt unsafe.
http://www.wzzm13.com/rss/article/2...-unsafe?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter
http://www.wzzm13.com/rss/article/2...-unsafe?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter
I know....O/T. Every time I see you Portabella, I want mushroom pizza :blushing:
Agreed, very good analysis.
Playing devils advocate for a moment.
BBM: If he plotted it meticulously, then:
1. How did he know she was working that night, when she didn't normally even work that night?
2. Why did he allow himself to be seen by witnesses?
3. Why did he allow himself to be filmed by multiple surveillance cameras?
Maybe these will help...
:eye: :eye:
You don't have to thank me...
![]()
Been gone watching the Travis Alexander trial and feel bad that I haven't checked in and really have relied on The Cheese for twitter updates, so thank you!
In regards to otto's map it's so glaringly obvious from the back door photo a camera should have been working.
The vibe from Jessica's case is getting more and more similar to Samatha Koenig's.
Sorry. Just not buying the random angle. Police even said he probably knew her either personally or through being a customer. He was also seen there 2 hours prior. That leads me to believe that my theory is more in line with theirs; that is, that he was obsessed with her even though he may not have given her or anyone else any overt signs of his delusion. Not to be crass, but stalking other'clerks in the area just looking for a random opportunity doesn't hold up due to J's specific characteristics. Most clerks aren't young, female, extroverted, and highly attractive. The chances of there being another one in such a small area at the same time is slim.
He wanted her. He chose her. He waited for her. He took her. Not unlike someone having a secret fantasy about his favorite bartender or waitress, and then acting on it. He plotted this meticulously, IMO. He probably parked somewhere where he could see her for hours until he built up the courage to do the deed. The 9pm drive by was a test run, IMO, and could have even been the first attempt but for his hesitation and/or customers being around. Heck, he may not have had plans to do it until she rebuffed him at 9pm and he lost it . This would consume a narcissist with rage.
Agreed, very good analysis.
Playing devils advocate for a moment.
BBM: If he plotted it meticulously, then:
1. How did he know she was working that night, when she didn't normally even work that night?
2. Why did he allow himself to be seen by witnesses?
3. Why did he allow himself to be filmed by multiple surveillance cameras?
Sorry. Just not buying the random angle. Police even said he probably knew her either personally or through being a customer. He was also seen there 2 hours prior. That leads me to believe that my theory is more in line with theirs; that is, that he was obsessed with her even though he may not have given her or anyone else any overt signs of his delusion. Not to be crass, but stalking other'clerks in the area just looking for a random opportunity doesn't hold up due to J's specific characteristics. Most clerks aren't young, female, extroverted, and highly attractive. The chances of there being another one in such a small area at the same time is slim.
He wanted her. He chose her. He waited for her. He took her. Not unlike someone having a secret fantasy about his favorite bartender or waitress, and then acting on it. He plotted this meticulously, IMO. He probably parked somewhere where he could see her for hours until he built up the courage to do the deed. The 9pm drive by was a test run, IMO, and could have even been the first attempt but for his hesitation and/or customers being around. Heck, he may not have had plans to do it until she rebuffed him at 9pm and he lost it . This would consume a narcissist with rage.
1. I think he had been stalking her not only at the Exxon, but also knew where she lived.
2. and 3. I think he dammed near got away without being seen by anyone and he knew there were no cameras. For me this was an obvious case of stalking and he had a plan to abduct. He also had a plan in place after the abduction, that's the scary part.
1. I think he had been stalking her not only at the Exxon, but also knew where she lived and knew what her movements were and what she was wearing (work clothes) and when to put his plan in to place.
2. and 3. I think he dammed near got away without being seen by anyone and he knew there were no cameras. For me this was an obvious case of stalking and he had a plan to abduct. He also had a plan in place after the abduction, that's the scary part.
Former coworker felt unsafe.
http://www.wzzm13.com/rss/article/2...-unsafe?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter