- Joined
- Mar 10, 2019
- Messages
- 1,110
- Reaction score
- 8,346
DbmSoooooo, he is not “on a hunger strike and there are no deficiencies to his health.”
UPDATE: Murder suspect Mark Latunski has not been refusing to eat
DbmSoooooo, he is not “on a hunger strike and there are no deficiencies to his health.”
UPDATE: Murder suspect Mark Latunski has not been refusing to eat
So, he was just in a catatonic state? MooSoooooo, he is not “on a hunger strike and there are no deficiencies to his health.”
UPDATE: Murder suspect Mark Latunski has not been refusing to eat
ITA. ML knew damn well EXACTLY what he was doing/did with KB and the others!i don’t trust yhis guy. He’s sly like a fox.
What a waste of life this man is!
Yes. They will get him on medication again. Once they tweak medication if need be he will be deemed fit to stand trial. Sad part is it will take as long as it takes. Hopefully it doesn't.Is it possible for someone who was found incompetent at some point, to be found competent later on?
It sounds like the judge still needs to rule on competency on Thursday...so I guess there's a (remote??) possibility the judge may not agree with the forensic psych center's conclusions.Is it possible for someone who was found incompetent at some point, to be found competent later on?
I do think he will be found incompetent on Thursday IMO. It's a formality on the record. Many a case this has happened. Once they have him on the right medication he will be deemed competent in time and good to go. To Trial. I have no doubt his Lawyer will pull this card at Trial. If there is any proof of pre planning or a cover up then his mental status is a moot point. IMO there likely will be enough to prove he knew what he was doing at the time of the crime.It sounds like the judge still needs to rule on competency on Thursday...so I guess there's a (remote??) possibility the judge may not agree with the forensic psych center's conclusions.
I wonder if there's a precedent for that...
True but I think his Lawyer could argue that most people if not all who engage in this lifestyle have rooms that are hidden.I believe that him having a hidden room should be enough to prove he knew right from wrong.
Yes that does show the element of planning but was he in his right mind when he did that. I think the man is evil and a bit of bat chit crazy in the mix. Don't get me wrong. I just want evidence of "normal" behaviour at the time just before the killing. His contact with Kevin, what was said, did he drive to pick Kevin up, when did he purchase items for the room which aided in the killing. I just want clear evidence so there is justice for Kevin. As we all do. We all know how a Defense Lawyer loves to muddy the waters."Your Honor, Men and Women of the jury I ask you who among us doesn't have a hidden door concealing an abattoir with sluice gates, a floor drain, meat hooks, ankle restraints and a chain hoist in the ceiling?"
Right? Destroy the whole thing and start again. Geez.