Michelle Young, pregnant mom, murdered Part 18

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #261
And it's the details of that you won't disclose. Why? It doesn't jeopardize the case in any way and who knows we just might agree with you. But no, you insist on playing trick or treat smell my feet. We cannot understand your anger with LE until you do tell us. Now might be the time to speak up since the professionals in this case aren't being favored by many right about now. You know why we're here, how about you?

It's not important why I am angry with LE. But I would like to know what you think about AL's revelation.

--Jake
 
  • #262
stoli, good guess ;)
 
  • #263
No, it isn't, Jake. You've got it backwards. The falling to his knees upon hearing the news and his refusal to speak with investigators reinforce my suspicions of him.

Not "suspicions", Scout. Conviction.

--Jake
 
  • #264
It's not important why I am angry with LE. But I would like to know what you think about AL's revelation.

--Jake


i'll defer to scout's post 251.
 
  • #265
"Refused"?? Scout, I think Jason was unable to speak.

--Jake


Puhleeze ! He had no trouble speaking to his buddies and his lawyer before coming home . Suddenly the cat seizes his tongue when it's time to talk to the big boys and he's been apoplectic ever since ?

Sorry, that excuse just doesn't fly.

Then couple that with , upon arrival, scurrying into the house like a scared rabbit and hiding behind his 2 yr old while his mother and sister grapple for their luggage ?

Since you refer to yourself as *mountain people* , I'd like to know how *mountain people * would read that kind of behavior. I reckon they would think that was right odd.
 
  • #266
It's not important why I am angry with LE. But I would like to know what you think about AL's revelation.

--Jake

Based on all of yours posts, it looks to the outside observer like you believe JY is guilty but you don't want to accept it and you are angry with LE because you know that they know he is guilty and they are going to prove it in a court of law. I would like to turn back the clock and make the murder not happen as well but that's not possible. You can't unring that bell.

I want to believe he didn't do it. Your posts and others that know him but support him speak loudly that the inside belief is that he is guilty but you really want him to get away with murder.
 
  • #267
Puhleeze ! He had no trouble speaking to his buddies and his lawyer before coming home . Suddenly the cat seizes his tongue when it's time to talk to the big boys and he's been apoplectic ever since ?

Sorry, that excuse just doesn't fly.

Then couple that with , upon arrival, scurrying into the house like a scared rabbit and hiding behind his 2 yr old while his mother and sister grapple for their luggage ?

Since you refer to yourself as *mountain people* , I'd like to know how *mountain people * would read that kind of behavior. I reckon they would think that was right odd.

great post. i wonder why there is no anger at jason for putting his mother between he and law enforcement. if he had stood up like a man, his mother wouldn't have even dealt with law enforcement!
 
  • #268
snipped+++++++++++++++

How do you know the whole story has not come out yet ? You have said repeatedly that the husband doesn't talk , that he talks only to his lawyer.

So, the family has forgiven the way the police allegedly treated them, but you have not ?

You are not a family member, you did not witness the alleged mistreatment , you never met the wife , you were not at the funeral and yet, six months later you are still in an unforgiving *huff* over something you heard about second or third hand ?

+++++++++++++++++++

I reckon that's the way friends are. I've got your back. Insult my friend and you insult me. I don't forgive insults easily nor quickly. I have four posters on ignore because of their rude personal insults. I tend to fire back and get kicked off boards.

--Jake
 
  • #269
Nope. Not on speaking terms with AL.

I believe LE is behind it. They probably play all of us for fools.

--Jake

Well, if LE is behind the release of the latest story, why would Ms. Lamb have any insight into why it's being released now?

The fact that you say there is more to the story leads me to suspect that you and/or your cohorts are behind it, Jake.
 
  • #270
snipped+++++++++++++

What the heck are you all about ? And what is your purpose for coming on these boards. Don't tell me it is to search for answers ; you can get that straight from the horse's mouth.

What is your agenda, man ? I sense that this is nothing but a game to you , and you want your man to *win*.

+++++++++++++++

I've answered this too many times. No agenda. No "horse's mouth". I want to know what others think. No "game". Certainly no "winner".

--Jake
 
  • #271
I think we already saw that with the tooth Strach. This family was peeved with their treatment at the outset and I think they decided at that time there was going to be payback.


JTF swore to it - payback. You haven't forgot about those tirades have you ?
 
  • #272
I think we already saw that with the tooth Strach. This family was peeved with their treatment at the outset and I think they decided at that time there was going to be payback.

This is much too serious for "payback". I'm much more peeved than the family is.

--Jake
 
  • #273
Not "suspicions", Scout. Conviction.

--Jake

Speak for yourself, Jake. I haven't convicted him in my own mind yet, but I do have strong suspicions of his culpability. BTW, I don't have the power to convict. If I did, I would wait for and weigh all of the evidence. With what's available to me now, I wouldn't convict him. My only hope right now is that LE will find enough evidence to charge and try the right person for Michelle's murder.
 
  • #274
Puhleeze ! He had no trouble speaking to his buddies and his lawyer before coming home . Suddenly the cat seizes his tongue when it's time to talk to the big boys and he's been apoplectic ever since ?

Sorry, that excuse just doesn't fly.

Then couple that with , upon arrival, scurrying into the house like a scared rabbit and hiding behind his 2 yr old while his mother and sister grapple for their luggage ?

Since you refer to yourself as *mountain people* , I'd like to know how *mountain people * would read that kind of behavior. I reckon they would think that was right odd.

Rather odd how you twist the reaction of a devastated husband and father. It makes me wonder about your agenda.

--Jake
 
  • #275
Speak for yourself, Jake. I haven't convicted him in my own mind yet, but I do have strong suspicions of his culpability. BTW, I don't have the power to convict. If I did, I would wait for and weigh all of the evidence. With what's available to me now, I wouldn't convict him. My only hope right now is that LE will find enough evidence to charge and try the right person for Michelle's murder.

you are so reasonable, scout. i agree wholeheartedly. i think if those close to him would think as reasonably, they would see that it is POSSIBLE that he could have done this. so many of us are not convinced completely, but for some reason people who taught him in high school are? interesting.
 
  • #276
I don't post much but I have to say something at this 6 month mark. If Jason Young is innocent then he should have NO reason not to go with his lawyer and talk to LE. He doesn't have to answer anything his lawyer does not want him to. It's BS to me that he is completely innocent yet he has not attended 2 memorial services for his wife nor has he tried to help in any way shape or form with the investigation. I have seen guilty people do 2 things. 1. Lawyer up and say nothing. 2. Flap their gums to LE and every reporter in sight. I have seen innocent people co operate with LE and plead with the public to help find the killer. What I have never seen is an innocent person hide away like a coward and refuse to utter a word to anyone. Sorry but "the right to remain silent" is IMO a right that is excercised by the guilty with something to hide.
 
  • #277
And the autopsy should have been performed by a qualified Medical Examiner, not an intern. This is a murder investigation. Is this the way things are usually done in NC? I guess seeing Dr. Radisch testify at the Mike Peterson trial gave me a false sense of their competency and professionalism.

I'm confused about this. I know that Hawthorne's pal addressed this and I brought it up here last nite and Sami disagrees. She says that the Pathologist Clark performed the autopsy.

I dug out the AR and on the front page it says:

Authorized by Kevine Green, M.D.
Persons present at autopsy: Mr. Kevin Gerity, Dr. Kevin Greene (no mention of the Pathologist, Thomas B. Clark)

Thomas B. Clark lll MD, Pathologist signs the Pathological Diagnoses but just above his signature it says:

"The facts stated herein are correct to the best of my knowledge and belief."

So. Are you saying that Greene performed the autopsy and Clark signed as his superior technically 'rubber stamped' it?
 
  • #278
Rather odd how you twist the reaction of a devastated husband and father. It makes me wonder about your agenda.

--Jake


I've only seen him once since Michelle's death, and that was only video-tape of him at Michelle's funeral. He didn't look like a devastated husband to me, Jake. Some of the things I've heard (sorry, can't repeat them) don't support the devastated husband facade either.
 
  • #279
Well, if LE is behind the release of the latest story, why would Ms. Lamb have any insight into why it's being released now?

The fact that you say there is more to the story leads me to suspect that you and/or your cohorts are behind it, Jake.

Nope. Not me. Promise. But I can't speak for my "cohorts".

You should know there is more to the story also.

I suspect AL knows more because of the way she wrote her original story. She put the real lead deep in the story. Why didn't she lead with those five paragraphs?

She had to know that was a much better lead than the one she had. What was she trying to hide? Was she trying to protect an LE source?

--Jake
 
  • #280
you are so reasonable, scout. i agree wholeheartedly. i think if those close to him would think as reasonably, they would see that it is POSSIBLE that he could have done this. so many of us are not convinced completely, but for some reason people who taught him in high school are? interesting.

That's very kind of you to say, Spring. I'm sure Jake doesn't agree with you.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
88
Guests online
2,636
Total visitors
2,724

Forum statistics

Threads
632,110
Messages
18,622,125
Members
243,022
Latest member
MelnykLarysa
Back
Top