Michelle Young, pregnant mom, murdered Part 18

[strach304]

It's not important why I am angry with LE. But I would like to know what you think about AL's revelation.

--Jake

From what I've gathered from you it is important. As for AL's revelation I have posted quite a bit with some varying ideas on it since that news broke. Guess you don't read all of my posts just like you don't answer them. I do think LE in cooperation with AL wanted the story out there. Two stories within hours showing that the oversight wasn't LE's fault and reasons made public for an exhumation or other possibilities. An offensive move on their part possibly. It was gonna come out anyway at some point.

 

[jake]

Speak for yourself, Jake. I haven't convicted him in my own mind yet, but I do have strong suspicions of his culpability. BTW, I don't have the power to convict. If I did, I would wait for and weigh all of the evidence. With what's available to me now, I wouldn't convict him. My only hope right now is that LE will find enough evidence to charge and try the right person for Michelle's murder.

Okay, Scout. I'll join you and hope and pray that LE will solve this horrible crime.

--Jake

 

[Scout]

I'm confused about this. I know that Hawthorne's pal addressed this and I brought it up here last nite and Sami disagrees. She says that the Pathologist Clark performed the autopsy.

I dug out the AR and on the front page it says:

Authorized by Kevine Green, M.D.
Persons present at autopsy: Mr. Kevin Gerity, Dr. Kevin Greene (no mention of the Pathologist, Thomas B. Clark)

Thomas B. Clark lll MD, Pathologist signs the Pathological Diagnoses but just above his signature it says:

"The facts stated herein are correct to the best of my knowledge and belief."

So. Are you saying that Greene performed the autopsy and Clark signed as his superior technically 'rubber stamped' it?

I honestly don't know, Jilly. The handwriting on the diagrams looks very similar to Dr Clark's handwriting -- signature and date. But I'm not a handwriting expert and the known sample is very limited. Sorry I can't be of more help.

 

[Scout]

Nope. Not me. Promise. But I can't speak for my "cohorts".

You should know there is more to the story also.

I suspect AL knows more because of the way she wrote her original story. She put the real lead deep in the story. Why didn't she lead with those five paragraphs?

She had to know that was a much better lead than the one she had. What was she trying to hide? Was she trying to protect an LE source?

--Jake

Why should I know there is more to the story? If you've got some info, why not just share, Jake?

 

[citygirl]

Rather odd how you twist the reaction of a devastated husband and father. It makes me wonder about your agenda.

--Jake

I'm not twisting the reaction of a devastated father and husband. I'm basing my assessment on what has been put forth by insiders. The husband may not be guilty but he sure does act like it , in my opinion.

 

[Scout]

Okay, Scout. I'll join you and hope and pray that LE will solve this horrible crime.

--Jake

Just out of curiosity, how often do you see Jason? Have you had any direct contact with him since Michelle was murdered? What can we expect to see if and when we ever catch sight of him again?

 

[QueenBee]

I don't post much but I have to say something at this 6 month mark. If Jason Young is innocent then he should have NO reason not to go with his lawyer and talk to LE. He doesn't have to answer anything his lawyer does not want him to. It's BS to me that he is completely innocent yet he has not attended 2 memorial services for his wife nor has he tried to help in any way shape or form with the investigation. I have seen guilty people do 2 things. 1. Lawyer up and say nothing. 2. Flap their gums to LE and every reporter in sight. I have seen innocent people co operate with LE and plead with the public to help find the killer. What I have never seen is an innocent person hide away like a coward and refuse to utter a word to anyone. Sorry but "the right to remain silent" is IMO a right that is excercised by the guilty with something to hide.

According to Jake, Jason has been helping LE all along by being the patsy. IMO

 

[strach304]

If there is any possibility that a SA or lover played into this Jason may be of help to the investigators. He can't at this point think that he knows nothing of any use without knowing what questions LE have and what they've uncovered. How many times has something slipped our mind because it seemed so insignificant we don't even remember until it's brought up.

 

[Scout]

If there is any possibility that a SA or lover played into this Jason may be of help to the investigators. He can't at this point think that he knows nothing of any use without knowing what questions LE have and what they've uncovered. How many times has something slipped our mind because it seemed so insignificant we don't even remember until it's brought up.

You're absolutely right, strach.

 

[FactsareFacts]

According to Jake, Jason has been helping LE all along by being the patsy. IMO

ROFLMAO Oh OK :doh: silly me. :silenced:

 

[strach304]

Jake, you might want to consider what Citygirl is pointing out. It is a valid argument and a contradiction of Jason's behavior on that crucial day. LE does take that into account so naturally us common folks will too.

 

[jake]

I don't post much but I have to say something at this 6 month mark. If Jason Young is innocent then he should have NO reason not to go with his lawyer and talk to LE. He doesn't have to answer anything his lawyer does not want him to. It's BS to me that he is completely innocent yet he has not attended 2 memorial services for his wife nor has he tried to help in any way shape or form with the investigation. I have seen guilty people do 2 things. 1. Lawyer up and say nothing. 2. Flap their gums to LE and every reporter in sight. I have seen innocent people co operate with LE and plead with the public to help find the killer. What I have never seen is an innocent person hide away like a coward and refuse to utter a word to anyone. Sorry but "the right to remain silent" is IMO a right that is excercised by the guilty with something to hide.

But I have to believe our Founding Fathers gave us that right to protect the innocent. I can't believe they were interested in protecting the guilty. I can't believe they were interested in protecting cowards.

--Jake

 

[citygirl]

Just out of curiosity, how often do you see Jason? Have you had any direct contact with him since Michelle was murdered? What can we expect to see if and when we ever catch sight of him again?

Scout,

Great questions. Unfortunately , he scurried right out of the room and doused the lights . Perhaps, he'll return later and enlighten us.

 

[QueenBee]

But I have to believe our Founding Fathers gave us that right to protect the innocent. I can't believe they were interested in protecting the guilty. I can't believe they were interested in protecting cowards.

--Jake

Interesting that you chose only to respond to JY's right to remain silent. What happened to all the talk about JY helping the investigation by being the fall guy????

 

[jake]

Why should I know there is more to the story? If you've got some info, why not just share, Jake?

I did share. I told you why you should know there is more to the story. You read the story the same as I. I just questioned why she buried her real lead so deep in the story. I figured you would also question that.

--Jake

 

[FactsareFacts]

But I have to believe our Founding Fathers gave us that right to protect the innocent. I can't believe they were interested in protecting the guilty. I can't believe they were interested in protecting cowards.

--Jake

Sorry but 99% of the time those that remain silent in these situations, do so because they have something to hide. I know what our rights are and what i'm saying is they get excercised by guilty parties not innocent parties.

 

[citygirl]

But I have to believe our Founding Fathers gave us that right to protect the innocent. I can't believe they were interested in protecting the guilty. I can't believe they were interested in protecting cowards.

--Jake

Absolutely correct. And your buddy has been afforded all that, don't you think ? He's innocent until proven guilty , and not only that, beyond a reasonable doubt. Seems fair to me.

 

[spring]

But I have to believe our Founding Fathers gave us that right to protect the innocent. I can't believe they were interested in protecting the guilty. I can't believe they were interested in protecting cowards.

--Jake

if they weren't interested in protecting cowards, maybe jason shouldn't be hiding behind them or his mom. i thought u all were so SURE that jason didn't do this. if u are so sure, why isn't his attorney so sure?

 

[jake]

Scout,

Great questions. Unfortunately , he scurried right out of the room and doused the lights . Perhaps, he'll return later and enlighten us.

Nope. Just answered the phone.

--Jake

 

[citygirl]

I did share. I told you why you should know there is more to the story. You read the story the same as I. I just questioned why she buried her real lead so deep in the story. I figured you would also question that.

--Jake

Huh ??????????