Michelle Young: Pregnant Mom, NC. part 7

[Samiya]

Not to nitpick here :blowkiss: but didn't we discover she was closer to 3 yrs old? (FYI)

I know, she's still a small child, but she seemed rather talkative! (Yes, yes I know she won't be up on the stand etc)

I can't say much but I can copy something that went with the transcript to WSCO, since they're my original investigative notes attached to the transcript....lol I forgot to take them out before sending. These notes were written after the enhancement was made and I made an assessment of Cassidy.

Notes from final transcript.....

"Cassidy Young notes: News reports have her as both 2 and 3 years of age and I would estimate 2 years and 6 or 7 months. For her age, Cassidy is a very articulate child with a well-developed speech pattern. Her voice key is between B# and C#. Speech patterns such as this is typical of first born children, in particular girls, who follow their mothers speech patterns from an early age and the patterns of other females within the family unit. Cassidy seems not to have been subjected to the normal ‘baby talk’ which is obvious in how Meredith speaks to her. Meredith speaking to Cassidy is direct and in an adult manner that uses words that Cassidy understands. Meredith is referred to by Cassidy as Aunee Meme, which is understandable as the name Meredith would be beyond even her although I believe she would say is as Mewediff on attempt."

 

[Taximom]

Thanks, Samiya! :blowkiss:

Cassidy reminds me an awful lot of my now 9 yr old when she was 2 - 3 yrs old. Very articulate and observant.....

 

[Samiya]

Thanks, Samiya! :blowkiss:

Cassidy reminds me an awful lot of my now 9 yr old when she was 2 - 3 yrs old. Very articulate and observant.....

You're welcome I have other notes attached, including my own estimation of TOD....bet they got a giggle out of my notes! (But at the same time I wonder how close I am, lol). Some of the notes are pretty gruesome

ETA: My daughter was the same.....those little blue peepers wouldn't miss a thing!

 

[Taximom]

This is an interesting way of finding a murderer if it's a complete stranger:

http://www.newsobserver.com/102/story/524576.html
(link provided already above)

The Wake County Sheriff's Office is scouring a laptop computer found in Jason Young's Ford Explorer for financial records, correspondence with insurance companies and other things that may help them find the person who killed his wife, Michelle, according to a search warrant filed Friday.


:crazy:

 

[Samiya]

This is an interesting way of finding a murderer if it's a complete stranger:

http://www.newsobserver.com/102/story/524576.html
(link provided already above)

The Wake County Sheriff's Office is scouring a laptop computer found in Jason Young's Ford Explorer for financial records, correspondence with insurance companies and other things that may help them find the person who killed his wife, Michelle, according to a search warrant filed Friday.


:crazy:

I want a copy of the warrant.....at least when WRAL reported about the warrants, they provided them for us.

N&O You plumb forgot to give us a copy of the warrant :crazy:

Speaking of crazy...I am off to bed. It's after 3am here.

Night all and hopefully see ya's soon

Cherry Mistmas

 

[Taximom]

I want a copy of the warrant.....at least when WRAL reported about the warrants, they provided them for us.

N&O You plumb forgot to give us a copy of the warrant :crazy:

Speaking of crazy...I am off to bed. It's after 3am here.

Night all and hopefully see ya's soon

Cherry Mistmas

Night, Samiya. Sweet dreams. Cherry Mistmas (lol) to you too!

 

[raisincharlie]

Michele could have made Cassidy the beneficiary of her insurance with Meredith or her mother as executer for that to be held in trust for her till she is of age. I had mine set up that way for my daughters with my brother as executer. Could also explain the trouble started about Meredith to make her seem untrustworthy, something to that. In a murder case such as this if Cassidy is the beneficiary then I don't see a hold up with paying it out.

This could be very possible Strach. It will be interesting to find out. We have a fairly new poster here, Belgardin (sp) who indicated they worked in insurance for several years - perhaps they will stop by and give us their thoughts hopefully.

The trouble with Meredith - I suspect this kind of thing will become SOP if and when this goes to trial - anything will be fair game to detract attention from the defendant IMO.

 

[scandi]

Here we go, another tidbit about a lap top siezure - Jy's lap top. Due to N&O copyright restrictions - you are just going to have to read it:


http://www.newsobserver.com/102/story/524576.html


So confirmation that there was a lap top in the SUV. I am assuming the warrant was returned on Friday Dec 22.

Mornin' Charlie, In reading this link you posted I see it as this warrant was filed on Friday the 22nd as the article is dated Dec 23rd and is fresh {not updated}. More time to wait now :banghead:

I thought it was most interesting the way this paper referred to the parties involved - the husband of the mother who was murdered. The thought showing the true tragedy. I liked that:

" . .The Wake County Sheriff's Office is scouring a laptop computer found in Jason Young's Ford Explorer for financial records, correspondence with insurance companies and other things that may help them find the person who killed his wife, Michelle, according to a search warrant filed Friday".

Scandi

 

[oceanblueeyes]

Michele could have made Cassidy the beneficiary of her insurance with Meredith or her mother as executer for that to be held in trust for her till she is of age. I had mine set up that way for my daughters with my brother as executer. Could also explain the trouble started about Meredith to make her seem untrustworthy, something to that. In a murder case such as this if Cassidy is the beneficiary then I don't see a hold up with paying it out.

Could she do this if she purchased it through her work though? Me and my hubby can only leave insurance to each other unless we give up the right to the money. Now if we aren't married or the spouse is no longer living we can leave it to whomever that is why we have secondary beneficiaries listing our children but this only comes into play if the other spouse is deceased too.

I think this came about as so many men were leaving their life insurance policies to their hidden lovers leaving the wife and children without any funds.

I know if one is legally married all 401K plans and pension plans must be left to the spouse unless once they give up their rights to these accounts.

IMO

Ocean

 

[scandi]

Hi Ocean!

It's always a pleasure to see you!

I watched CC, and although DH was talking to me when this segment aired, and didn't catch the gent's name, I believe he said JY had an alibi, confirmed by his parents that he with them at their house in Brevard when MY was murdered. IIRC, the guy who said this was white, not the AA gent.

I was left with the impression that this confirmed alibi is what's keeping JY from being named a suspect, although he is considered a POI. I also heard that there are no other suspects.

IMO

Hi Haypaula, It ws a tricky statement to grasp because it ws quite short and the words were carefully chosen to get the meaning across. I did take notes, and this is exactly what the white guy said about that:

" . .He was at his parents home at the time the body was discovered, and not necessarily at the time of her death."

For some reason I thought the white guy was from AMW - I seldom watch CC.

Scandi

 

[oceanblueeyes]

OK, it probably isn't much and I don't even know if this is the original article I read, but here's the link and excerpt that said JY was with family when MY was found dead....

http://rdu.news14.com/content/your_news/triangle/?SecID=512&ArID=94213

"Young says he was with his family in the western part of the state when his wife's body was found inside their home by her sister, Meredith Fisher. The couple's 2-year-old daughter was found inside the home at the time; she was unharmed."

Yes they erroneously misspoke. They sent a message to CTV posters with a retraction. They meant to say he was in Brevard when her body was discovered.

I think it was around the 14th when they sent the retraction letter. It was deleted by CW for some reason the first time but is now back on the board.

IMO

Ocean

 

[Taximom]

Yes they erroneously misspoke. They sent a message to CTV posters with a retraction. They meant to say he was in Brevard when her body was discovered.

I think it was around the 14th when they sent the retraction letter. It was deleted by CW for some reason the first time but is now back on the board.

IMO

Ocean

Oh, thanks Ocean. :blowkiss:

I barely have time for WS, let alone reading at CTV!

ETA: The article should have been corrected as well, IMHO.

 

[oceanblueeyes]

I believe 12/22 is the return date of the warrant nothing to do with the date it was seized. Without seeing the warrant, the date activity was requested is not ascertainable.

ETA - read it again - the article is confusing -it says filed - it is possible the 12/22 date is the date request was made for forensic investigation of the hard drive. Confusing article except that it confirms the lap top was in the SUV. I take that as good news - perhaps all his clothes were still in the SUV as well.

Well did we find out the answer Charlie? I have been away wrapping last minute presents.

Could "filed" mean it was the time LE recorded it in the the courthouse? I do know that there usually is a lag and these warrants are not placed in public records immediately but at a later date.

IMO

Ocean

 

[Taximom]

Hi Haypaula, It ws a tricky statement to grasp because it ws quite short and the words were carefully chosen to get the meaning across. I did take notes, and this is exactly what the white guy said about that:

" . .He was at his parents home at the time the body was discovered, and not necessarily at the time of her death."

For some reason I thought the white guy was from AMW - I seldom watch CC.

Scandi

Interesting that this statement is backed up by the erroneous statement I ran across (above).

 

[oceanblueeyes]

Interesting that this statement is backed up by the erroneous statement I ran across (above).

I dont understand what you mean. Ed with AMW statement was correct.

IMO

Ocean

 

[Taximom]

I dont understand what you mean. Ed with AMW statement was correct.

IMO

Ocean

"Young says he was with his family in the western part of the state when his wife's body was found inside their home

and

this is exactly what the white guy said about that:

" . .He was at his parents home at the time the body was discovered, and not necessarily at the time of her death."

For some reason I thought the white guy was from AMW - I seldom watch CC.

Don't they both mean the same thing? What am I missing?! My brain is filled with visions of sugarplums right now!

 

[oceanblueeyes]

Hi Haypaula, It ws a tricky statement to grasp because it ws quite short and the words were carefully chosen to get the meaning across. I did take notes, and this is exactly what the white guy said about that:

" . .He was at his parents home at the time the body was discovered, and not necessarily at the time of her death."

For some reason I thought the white guy was from AMW - I seldom watch CC.

Scandi

Yes Scandi you are correct. Ed has been with AMW for quite awhile now. I see him often on other cases. I find him to be very aticulate and very careful what he says.

It still is so interesting when CC asked him what he had learned and he said that LE cannot place Jason at the home at the time of the murder. He is like John Walsh and AMW has had many cases they air from NC...I think they both have many inside sources.

IMO

Ocean

 

[oceanblueeyes]

"Young says he was with his family in the western part of the state when his wife's body was found inside their home

and

this is exactly what the white guy said about that:

" . .He was at his parents home at the time the body was discovered, and not necessarily at the time of her death."

For some reason I thought the white guy was from AMW - I seldom watch CC.


Don't they both mean the same thing? What am I missing?! My brain is filled with visions of sugarplums right now!

Yes they do but at first the Raleigh news article said he was in Brevard at the time of the murder. LOL That is what I thought you were referring to........LOL

I dont remember the exact quote on what he said but it was very very interesting indeed.......the entire thing that is .......not just this one sentence. The gist of what he said that was totally interesting to me was LE cannot place him in the home at the time of the murder.

IMO

Ocean

 

[Taximom]

Yes they do but at first the Raliegh news article said he was in Brevard at the time of the murder. LOL That is what I thought you were referring to........LOL

I dont remember the exact quote on what he said but it was very very interesting indeed.......the entire thing that is .......not just this one sentence. The gist of what he said that was totally interesting to me was LE cannot place him in the home at the time of the murder.

IMO

Ocean

Whew. Thought I was going nuts there for a second. (No comment from the peanut gallery please!)

I wish I had seen CCL now. When will I learn to stop assuming? :doh:

 

[Scout]

The latest N&O article lends credence to the statement by Ed on CCL that there was something fishy about the insurance papers and will.

Scouring the laptop for financial records and correspondence with insurance companies -- sounds like some alterations may have been made in recent months...perhaps fraudulently and without Michelle Young's knowledge or consent.