close_enough
Inactive
raisincharlie said:A sense of humor is a wonderful thing isn't it ?![]()
lol, yes it is raisin

raisincharlie said:A sense of humor is a wonderful thing isn't it ?![]()
I'm thinking you may be a genious packerdog ! What if something such as the phone told LE immediately that JY spoke to Michelle at 11 and in the process of working the phone backwards they located the hotel - if it were 1,2 or even 3 hours away someone is going to wonder why so close yet so far... after Meredith telling them JY was out of town on a business trip. hmmm. Really excellent thought packerdog !packerdog said:I keep going back to the LE timeline between 12:00am and 6:00 am. This was put out right after the murder and I think it's important. LE must have known from the get go what time Jason called Michelle and from where, and then figure how long it would take Jason to drive back to the house. If they are uncertain who killed her then why would they put out this timeline?
packerdog said:I keep going back to the LE timeline between 12:00am and 6:00 am. This was put out right after the murder and I think it's important. LE must have known from the get go what time Jason called Michelle and from where, and then figure how long it would take Jason to drive back to the house. If they are uncertain who killed her then why would they put out this timeline?
PolkSaladAnnie said:Indeed, Ocean ... and that's the flip-side... And that's perhaps the single most things that has thwarted me. The media investigators. Even if the regular press hasn't snooped around, then what has happened to the National Enquirer reporters? The media aren't polite - they'll print anything.
Ther is only ONE paper I believe may be holding 'mum' under agreement and that's the News & Observer: I think they may be working with LE on this - no matter who the perp is.
The info-release has been a miniscule drip-feed - NO details other than what the Sheriff wants us to know (IMO)
Believe it or not I have never seen a 'real life' NE. I've seen 'Net-scanned images; copied articles - but never ever seen the most embarrassingly famous rag-mag that folk hid between that pages of The Wall Street Journal to read at check-out tills.
raisincharlie said:I'm thinking you may be a genious packerdog ! What if something such as the phone told LE immediately that JY spoke to Michelle at 11 and in the process of working the phone backwards they located the hotel - if it were 1,2 or even 3 hours away someone is going to wonder why so close yet so far... after Meredith telling them JY was out of town on a business trip. hmmm. Really excellent thought packerdog !
close_enough said:i don't know about others' message machines, but ours give the time the message/call was received
close_enough said:LOL, i get the NE weekly....i even scrambled to the mail box this week, JUST to see if there was ANYTHING about this case in it.... :blushing: ...course there wasn't....will get the next one Tuesday.....i don't look for this to be in the NE though.....seems there's just not enough to 'chew on', but you never know!!!!....
PolkSaladAnnie said:Close, you know I am thinking there *has* to be *something* else that gave LE the early understanding this was not a random crime...
Call me mad, but don't start a rumour: this is lateral thinking:
... IF .... it was Jason: do you think he may have (example) done something else that alerted LE? Something really small - out of normal suspicion ... ? Like ... say he left food out for the dog, wondering how long it would be before someone came - or to quieten the dog? But ... the food wasn't touched?
Something silly, like THAT ...
I'm trying to do these 'walk throughs' ... WHAT else could it be?
Taximom said:Popping back in quickly to say that Dateline tonight (8 e.s.t nbc) is about Michael Peterson(Raleigh-Durham, NC). Two whole hours! That was an interesting case to me.
Have a nice Saturday, everyone!
Keep me in line close_enough ! It has been added at #17 - good catch because I totally forgot that rather significant detail !:bang:close_enough said:raisin....No forced entry...can that be put on the list, or did i miss it?
Taximom said:Popping back in quickly to say that Dateline tonight (8 e.s.t nbc) is about Michael Peterson(Raleigh-Durham, NC). Two whole hours! That was an interesting case to me.
Have a nice Saturday, everyone!
fran said:I agree with you packerdog. This timeline is important. I do feel it has something to do with J's phone call etc..........
oh,...........WHY NO REWARD OFFERED? even by the family????????There's almost ALWAYS a reward by someone. What's with that? Quite often here, even LE offers a $10K or $25K reward.
JMHO
fran
raisincharlie said:Keep me in line close_enough ! It has been added at #17 - good catch because I totally forgot that rather significant detail !:bang:
Keep thinking, I bet there is more...
close_enough said:oooooh, thanks TM!!...i was all into that case also..i'll be watching for sure....
i've got a big pot of chili simmering on the stove..need to get cleaned up & head to my Daddy's for a visit this afternoon....will see yall later!
Not sure what you mean PSA - #1 references the business trip. You want me to move it or specify it in another way ? No problem - let me know.PolkSaladAnnie said:Hi charlie ... what about the supposed business trip around your points 4 & 5 ? That's the official account of his trip - the parents were not mentioned at first.
raisincharlie said:Amended: 3
1. Husband leaves night before murder for a business trip.
2. Husband is last person to speak with wife at 11 pm.
3. Last person(s) known to see victim was (were) friend(s).
4. Wife is 4 months pregnant, therefore statistically at risk.
5. Husband phones SIL the next day asking to retrieve a fax from his home.
6. SIL finds murdered wife.
7. 2.5 year old child left alive and unharmed.
8. Dog in house.
9. Neighbors unaware of anything unusual except outside lights being on
a couple of days prior to the murder.
10. Husband on way to parents home when body is found.
11. Reported child in the neighborhood with supposed behavioral issues.
12. Wife previously lost a baby shortly after an auto accident.
13. Wife works flex time and may or may not have been expected at work.
14. Husband's vehicle is immediately impounded upon return to home area.
15. Husband retains lawyer at some point.
16. Sheriff's spokeswoman indicates the crime is not random.
17. LE indicates no "forced entry" at the crime scene.
18. Sheriff reports neighborhood is quiet with very few problems.
19. Police asked for information about events between 12 and 6 am.
20. Police investigate previous accident involving couple - May 2005.
21. Police have made no further appeals to the public for assistance.
22. Sheriff indicates in interview with Greta, no warrants obtained for collection of fingerprints of several people.
23. Husband complies with Non-testimonial order and gives samples requested in presence of his lawyer.
24. No external tip line established (police tip line exists).
25. No reward for information posted by sheriff or families.
Newest add #17 - no forced entry.