Missing cell phones

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #621
Wonder how long her ex-boyfriend has been an EX?? Could they have been calling him? Hmmmm.
 
  • #622
The woman in that interview showing through her window is the same identified as LP in the first interview.
 
  • #623
It sure is a big CO-HINKY-DINKY innit?

If MW has been interviewed 4 times any link with the family will have been established same applies to Jersey so therefore the LE will definately be closer to answers than we imagine. I believe they are now trying to gain evidence for an arrest hence the search yesterday and the request for further interviews with family members
 
  • #624
The cell phones make me nuts and have from the start..they are the key to all of this (imo) Scenerio 1. has me thinking DB made a text/call had to get rid of them because of that.. 2. has me thinking one of the boys did BUT as I think about one of the boys making a call, all kids are taught to call 911 in an emergency (it would be interesting to know if the MK call number is close to Dad's cell, but as I think on THAT, it would be on speed dial right? (grrr) so why would it be a misdial OR since DB was reprogramming child needed to use memory and misdialed??...3. intruder DID take the phones and misdialed BECAUSE they had to use the phone to call from memory as it was not their own phone... (I do not believe that an intruder took Lisa) 4. I think too much :/
 
  • #625
You just had to go there didn't you, Gardenlady?

Sorry! Could be worse though, earlier I was picturing Jersey and MW, which led to someone else speculating about the size of his huge personality! :innocent:

:floorlaugh:
 
  • #626
They need to check the one off Winn.

There is no longer a lake at Winn Road. Are you thinking of Winnwood Lake? If so, that was drained years ago, Target and Food Festival and the strip mall sit where the lake used to be.
 
  • #627
no sleuthing of the phone lady....
 
  • #628
She probably does know but all she has to tell is LE not the media nor us.

It's just that if she tells the media a different story than what she told LE it hurts her credibility and they may impeach her if she's ever to make a witness statement in a trial. So I wouldn't advise lying to the media, just say no comment if you don't want to tell us.
 
  • #629
  • #630
If she'd been through the neighborhood with an ex-boyfriend several times, then my guess is the ex has friends or family in the neighborhood.

Yep, and I'm thinking across the street. WTH is going on on N. Lister?
 
  • #631
I can only log on for a few minutes. Would someone be so kind as to recap what's happened? Thank you so much!
 
  • #632
If true that it lasted 50 seconds it would have been a call and not a text message.

Don't un-answered calls show up as one minute calls?
 
  • #633
I always thought the missing phones were a lame attempt to make it look like there was intruder. Now it appears that it may have been necessary to get rid of them so they could say "we didn't have them when that call/those calls were made."
 
  • #634
I believe Judge Janine. The phone was not even answered. It went to voice mail according to her LE source. Well, she said "police source."


MOO

LaLaw, you should of learned from the Cooper trial that a cell phone does not ring for 50 seconds before VM kicks in. The real question is does the 50 seconds include the time the call was in VM (some carriers seperate the times between the 'ringing' call and then when it's gets picked up)
 
  • #635
Well I don't know if I believe her. There is apparently something hideworthy about this phonecall if DB lied about her phones not being able to make any calls, and it seems to me that this lady would at least have known who could have had access to her phone at 2:30 am.

I think she's telling the truth. This is just so mysterious. So. It wasn't a pocket call, since she didn't know the Irwins. Not a number programmed into an Irwin family phone. This was someone calling HER, I believe, on purpose, because if it was a mere misdial they'd try again to get the number right. This person stopped trying to make a call after reaching her voicemail.

IMHO, it was someone who knows her well enough to have memorized her cell number - most people I know don't have many numbers memorized, they have them programmed into their phone.

So based on them not trying again as if they misdialed, it seems they reached who they wanted to reach. AND they had her number memorized.
 
  • #636
Waittttttttt ....Dangit....hold the phones...!! How the heck did she know this was the stolen phone number??????????????????????????????????????????? Do we have that info???
 
  • #637
She was identified by name in msm source.

much like the drinking buddy, who was also named in the main stream media, we are not sleuthing the phone lady.

they have not been named persons of interest or suspects.

thanks
 
  • #638
Waittttttttt ....Dangit....hold the phones...!! How the heck did she know this was the stolen phone number??????????????????????????????????????????? Do we have that info???

Considering police interviewed her, I am guessing police told her.
 
  • #639
I always thought the missing phones were a lame attempt to make it look like there was intruder. Now it appears that it may have been necessary to get rid of them so they could say "we didn't have them when that call/those calls were made."

Why would the Irwins make this call? She doesn't know them.
 
  • #640
I can only log on for a few minutes. Would someone be so kind as to recap what's happened? Thank you so much!

A woman named MW with pink hair received a phone call on Oct 3rd evening from one of the stolen cell phones. We don't which phone. We don't know what time. It apparently lasted 50 seconds. It's unclear if the phone was answered by someone other than MW or if it the call went to voice mail (inconsistent information in 2 different news pieces). MW says she doesn't know the Irwin/Bradley family, but she has walked through the neighborhood with her ex in the past. MW says she has been interviewed by LE 4 times.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
131
Guests online
2,683
Total visitors
2,814

Forum statistics

Threads
632,205
Messages
18,623,529
Members
243,056
Latest member
Urfavplutonian
Back
Top